1/40
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
learner characterictics
individual factors that influence the process and yputcome of second/forgein lang. acq.
main categories of learner characteristics
linguistic experience
experience with L2
sociopsychological factors
cognitive factors
biological factors
leraners lignustic experience - definition
the leraner pror knowledge at the start of L2 learning
L1 expereince - effect on L2
→ More developed L1 = more transfer
→ Can be facilitating or interfering
→ Strong L1 may make restructuring harder
experience with additional languages
→ Previous L2/L3 learning can lead to positive transfer
→ Multilingual learners often learn additional languages more efficiently
experience with L2 (definition)
length of learning, quantitiy and quality of input
input quantity vs quality
→ Quantity = amount of exposure
→ Quality = richness, authenticity, interaction
sociops\chological facotrs (examples)
→ Motivation
→ Attitudes
→ Anxiety
→ Identity
cognitive factors (examples)
→ Intelligence (IQ)
→ Language aptitude
→ Memory
→ Attention
→ Analytical ability
biological factors (examples)
→ Age
→ Sex
→ Hearing
→ Brain plasticity
age in SLA - what is studied?
How age affects success, rate, and ultimate attainment in L2 learning
age of onset (AOL)
age at which L2 learning begins
age of arrival (AOA)
→ Age at which a learner arrives in an L2-speaking environment (SLA).
general finding: early vs late starters
→ Early starters usually achieve higher ultimate attainment
→ Late starters often learn faster at the beginning
why do early starters often outperform late starters
→ Longer exposure
→ More input
→ Less entrenched L1 system
→ Higher brain plasticity
critical period hypothesis (CPH)
The claim that language acquisition must occur within a biologically determined time window for native-like attainment.
key name - critical period hypothesis
Eric Lenneberg
Lenneberg calim (critical period hypothesis)
→ Language is biologically based
→ Linked to neurological maturation
→ Similar to imprinting in animals
critical period hypothesis claim for L2 learning
Native-like proficiency is impossible if L2 learning starts after puberty.
main problem with critical period hypothesis
Difficult to define exact boundaries
Evidence is mixed
Scovel and pronouncation - main claim
→ Late learners may acquire syntax and vocabulary
→ Native-like pronunciation is impossible after the critical period
Johnson & Newport
One of the most cited studies supporting CPH.
what did Johnson & Newport study?
Relationship between age of arrival and grammatical proficiency in English.
main finding (Johnson & Newport)
Strong negative correlation between AOA and test scores before puberty
Weak correlation after puberty
what does thier study support? (Johnson & Newport)
Maturational State Hypothesis
two versions on critical period hypothesis
exercise hypothesis
maturational state hypothesis
Maturational State Hypothesis
→ Language-learning capacity declines with biological maturation
→ Applies to both L1 and L2
Exercise Hypothesis
→ Humans have a capacity for language learning
→ If not exercised early, it disappears
→ If exercised, language learning abilities remain intact for life
Cerebral lateralization (definition)
Neurological specialization of brain hemispheres for language
Effect of completed lateralization
→ Brain becomes less flexible
→ New language systems cannot fully develop
Continuous mode (children)
→ All speech sounds are perceived equally
→ No fixed phonological categories
Categorical perception
→ Sounds are categorized into L1 phonemes
→ Emerges as L1 phonology stabilizes
Effect on L2 phonology
→ New L2 sounds are mapped onto existing L1 categories
→ Leads to foreign accent
Who learns faster initially?
→ Older learners (better cognitive skills)
Who achieves higher ultimate attainment?
→ Younger learners
Correlation (definition)
→ Statistical relationship between two variables
→ Values range from –1 to +1
Important warning about correlation
→ Correlation ≠ causation
Confounding factors (definition)
Variables that influence results alongside age
Key confounding factor in age studies
→ L1 experience (development and use)
Why L1 experience matters
→ Stronger L1 → stronger transfer
→ Can interfere with L2 restructuring
Main conclusion about age effects in SLA
→ Age matters, but effects are gradual, not absolute
→ Experience, input, and L1 development are crucial