Edexcel A-Level Politics Paper 1 - Democracy and Participation

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 45

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

46 Terms

1

Democratic Deficiency

Perceived deficiency in the way a particular democratic body works, in terms of accountability and control over policy-making

New cards
2

YouGov Poll for Sky (2024) results

  • 49% of respondents say they “almost never” trust the British government to place needs of nation above own interests - up from 26% in 2019

  • 73% of voters believe politicians don’t care about what people like them think - up from 51% in 2019

  • 67% think that politicians in Westminster ignore the issues they care about - up from 50% in 2019

New cards
3

Michelle Mone - MedPro PPE Scandal

  • During COVID, accused of cronyism and mismanagement for own personal interests

  • Baroness Mone recommended MedPro, a PPE firm linked with her husband, and it was fast-tracked through the gov. ‘VIP lane’ and awarded contracts of over £200M for supplying PPE to the NHS

  • Subsequent investigations found significant transfer of funds, including at least £65M of profit from these contracts, to offshore accounts, some of which benefitted Mone directly

  • Corruption - contributed to mistrust of politicians among the public

New cards
4

MPs Second Jobs and Freelance Work (2022/23)

  • Guardian reported in 2023 that MPs were paid £10M from second jobs and freelance work

  • Sajid Javid earned £300,000 a year as an adviser to Jersey-based investment firm Centricus Partners

  • Boris Johnson made £4.8M from speaking opportunities and consulting

  • Reform MP Lee Anderson paid £100,000 per year for hosting a show on GB News, for just 8 hours of work per week

New cards
5

MPs elected without General Election

  • Both Liz Truss and Rishi Sunday were made PM through internal party processes, rather than beating the opposite in an election

  • Rather than receiving support as head of their party in a General Election, they were selected. By less than 200,000 Conservative Party MPs

  • Both have played a pivotal role in shifting policy away from Conservative Party’s 2019 manifesto, e.g. Lizz Truss’ neoliberal mini budget and Rishi Sunak cancelling HS2

  • Undermining mandate

New cards
6

Cameron’s Appointment as Foreign Secretary (2023)

  • Undermines democracy - not elected

  • Made a peer by Sunak for the sole purpose of serving in his government

  • Won’t be subject to scrutiny from elected MPs, as he won’t face regular questioning by MPs during usual Foreign Office questions as a member of the HoL

  • Was unpopular when he left politics, and involved in the Greensil lobbying scandal, which further undermined public trust

New cards
7

By-Elections since the 2019 Election - MP Misconduct

  • Between 2019 and 2024, there were 23 by-elections, the majority of which were triggered due to MPs being forced to resign for breaking the law/ severe misconduct

  • 2024 Tory MP Peter Bone - Wellingborough, suspended for bullying and sexual harassment allegations

  • 2024 Tory MP Scott Benton - Blackpool South, suspended for breaching lobbying rules, exposed by the Times for offering to leak documents and ask questions for a fake gambling company

  • 2022 Tory MP Neil Parish - Tiverton and Honiton, resigned after admitting to watching pornographers twice in the HoC

  • 2021 Labour MP Mike Hill - Hartlepool, resigned amid allegations of sexual harassment and victimisation

New cards
8

Positive Democratic Features of UK Political System

  • Devolved gov in Wales, NI and Scotland, as well as elected mayors in major cities; decisions closer to the people

  • Use of referendums

  • Independent judiciary

  • Free media, politically neutral broadcast media and free access to the internet

  • Free, fair and relatively regularly elections

  • Wide range of parties and pressure groups

New cards
9

Arguments for UK Democratic Deficit

  • FPTP system - means little representation for minority viewpoints in parliament. Also very unrepresentative in general, resulting in representatives and governments with limited legitimacy

  • General elections produce unrepresentative results; in 2024, the Labour Party won with only 33.7% of the vote

  • HoL is unelected and can still exercise power and halt bills proposed by Commons

  • Lack of protection of citizen’s rights - ECoHR provides inadequate guarantees (e.g. Rwanda Policy)

  • Control of sections of media by wealthy, unaccountable business interests, e.g. Rupert Murdoch

  • Many members of the HoC can be seen ads looking out for themselves and their careers rather than caring about representation, e.g. MPs having second jobs and going into lobbying after leaving politics

New cards
10

Who can vote in UK Elections?

  • All adults over 18 who are registered

  • British and Irish citizens have reciprocal rights to vote in each other’s countries

  • Commonwealth citizens are allowed to vote, as are UK nationals who have lived abroad for less than 15 years

New cards
11

Who can’t vote in UK Elections?

  • People under the age of 18

  • EU citizens (except those from the ROI) although they can vote in local elections

  • Members of the HoLs

  • Prisoners

  • Those who are convicted of a corrupt or illegal electoral practice, who are barred for 5 years

  • People who are compulsorily detained in a psychiatric hospital

New cards
12

Types of Constituencies Pre 1832

  • Two types of constituencies - boroughs (towns) and countries, which varied considerably in size

  • Counties - right to vote was only granted to those who freehold property worth at least 40 shillings

  • Boroughs - right to vote varied according to a range of local rules and traditions. In some boroughs, all freemen were allowed to vote, whereas in others it depended on property ownership or the payment of local tax

New cards
13

Problems with Pre 1832 Political System

  • Distribution of seats had not kept up with economic growth and population movement, so some very small boroughs still retained a historic right to vote in MPs while large emerging industrial towns had no representation of their own

  • Plural voting allowed wealthy men who owned property in more than one constituency to vote more than once

  • Women were disenfranchised

  • By the early 19th century, the electorate totalled 400,000 (all men) compared to a population of around 10M

New cards
14

Great Reform Act 1832

  • Abolished the separate representation of underpopulated boroughs and created seats for urban boroughs such as Manchester

  • Extended the vote to hold more people in the counties; including tenant farmers and smaller property holders

  • Created a standard qualification for the franchise in the boroughs, so it now applied to all male householders living in properties who paid a yearly rental of £10 or more (growing middle class thanks to industrial rev)

  • The vote increased to an estimated 650,000 (approx. 5% of adult population) - compared to around 400,000 in early 1800s

New cards
15

Chartist Movement

  • Grew out of the failure of the 1832 Great Reform Act to extend the vote to those who didn’t own property. It was a mass movement driven by the working classes and continued for 2 decades

  • Campaigned for the franchise to be extended to all men over 21, a secret ballot, payment of MPs and annual parliamentary elections, among other things

New cards
16

1858 changes

  • All men over 21 could become an MP whether or not they owned property

New cards
17

1867 Second Reform Act

  • Introduced secret ballot

  • Decreased the bribery and bullying involved in voting

New cards
18

1884 Third Reform Act

  • Gave most working men the vote

  • 18% of the population and 2/3 men

New cards
19

By 1885

  • Constituencies had to have an equal number of votes

New cards
20

The Suffragists (1800s-1918)

  • 1897 - establishment of the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) under the leadership of Millicent Fawcett - mainly middle class women

  • They believed in non-violent methods of persuasion, e.g peaceful demonstrations, petitions and lobbying MPs

  • There was evidence that opinion was changing, however for more radical campaigners progress was too slow

New cards
21

The Suffragettes

  • Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) set up in 1903 by Emmeline Pankhurst, a former suffragist

  • Attracted both working-class and middle-class support and used more militant tactics; aiming to attract publicity and pressure on parliament through attacks on well known institutions and disruption of political meetings and other prominent male-dominated activities

  • E.g. Emily Davison threw herself under the king’s horse at Epsom Derby

  • Suspended campaign following outbreak of WW1

New cards
22

Effectiveness of the Suffrage Movement

  • Some historians argue that the quiet, undramatic work of the suffragists has not been recognised and the violent methods of the suffragettes alienated potential supporters

  • Others argue that while the suffragette movement was vital in keeping the issue of voting rights on the agenda in the decade before WW1

  • Another argument is that the role of women in WW1 proved to the gov their fitness for the vote

New cards
23

1918 Representation of the People Act

  • Granted all men over 21 and all women over 30 who were householders or wives of householders the vote

  • 75% of adult population could now vote

  • It was passed as there was growing pressure to give all working class men the vote (following service in WW1)

New cards
24

Further Reform - Votes at 16

  • Votes at 16 Coalition formed in 2003 and found early success as they secured a study of the issue by the Electoral Commission

  • Though the report came down on the side of no change, several MPs kept the issue alive in the HoC

  • In 2014, 16 and 17 year olds were allowed to vote in the Scottish Independence Referendum, and the Scottish Parliament voted a year later to allow them to vote in their elections

  • In the 2024 election, the Labour Party supported votes at 16

New cards
25

Arguments for Votes at 16

  • 16 year olds have other legal rights; leaving school, starting work and joining the army - should therefore be deemed mature enough to vote as well

  • Enfranchising 16 year olds would increase political participation

  • Social media has lead to increased political awareness among the young and they have led recent political movements such as the Fridays for Future climate strikes

  • The granting of the vote to 16-17 year olds in Scottish elections has led to increased political engagemen

  • Having a vote would give 16 year olds a say on issues that mean a lot to them such as university tuition fees

New cards
26

Arguments Against Votes at 16

  • 16 year olds lack the necessary life experience and maturity to vote. They are still children and have to still be in education or training

  • Many know little about politics and would misuse the right to vote - better political education is needed first

  • More likely to be taken in by fake news and extreme politics (e.g. rising communist movement among youth)

  • Some of the legal rights 16 year olds have are limited in practice

  • Relatively few countries grant 16 year olds the right to vote, so the UK is not abnormal

  • Voter turnout is very low among 18-24 year olds and there’s little evidence that the majority of 16–17 year olds want the vote

New cards
27

E-Voting and Digital Democracy

  • Digital democracy refers to the use of social media by groups that seek to spread influence

  • They help to inform the public more effectively than traditional media about political issues

  • Allow organisations with modest financial and administrative resources to mount political campaigns and spread their views

  • Allow people to participate more readily and effectively in political action - by becoming more informed, expressing political views and taking part in polls

  • They have become key channels of communication between the government and the governed

New cards
28

E-Petitions in the UK

  • If an e-petition receives over 10,000 signatures it will get a response from the gov and if it receives 100,000 and is backed by an MP, it is considered for debate in parliament

  • Revoke Article 50 petition of March 109 received over 6M signatures

  • The Ban all ISIS Members from Returning to the UK petition received around 600,000 signatures and was debated in parliament

  • In 2011, a petition calling fror the release of all documents relating to the Hillsborough disaster of 1989 resulted in a debate in parliament, and the release of the papers and the launch of a new inquest

  • Websites such as 38 Degrees also have e-petitions, and while they can’t force parliament to debate anything, can pressure gov and opposition and provide evidence of public support

New cards
29

E-Petition on Maternity Pay (2023)

  • E-petition titled “Increase statutory maternity pay in line with the cost of living crisis” received over 38,000 signatures

  • The petition reached the required threshold of signatures and was debated by the Petitions Committee on June 19th 2023

  • Debate emphasised the financial struggles faced by families with new babies

  • The gov responded with an enhancement to maternity pay, increasing the flat rate of statutory maternity pay from £156.66 to £172.48 per week, a 10.1% increase

New cards
30

Arguments that e-democracy and digital democracy enhance democracy

  • Increase political participation by bringing in people who don’t have the inclination, ability or time to participate in more conventional ways such as party or pressure group membership

  • Inform the electorate

  • Communicate directly between gov and governed

  • Enhance pluralism by preventing powerful, elitist groups who have concentrated power from having exclusive access to gov

New cards
31

Arguments that e-democracy/ digital democracy threaten democracy

  • Give public greater access to extremist groups, such as those who are racist and those who promote violence

  • Disinformation is a big problem, with lies having the ability to affect election results

  • Gov may be influenced by short-term, ‘populist’ campaigns that don’t reflect wider, national public opinion

New cards
32

Arguments for Compulsory Voting

  • Voting is a social duty as well as a right; it encourages people to be engaged in politics

  • Would make parliament more representative of the population

  • Politicians would have to run their campaigns with the whole electorate in mind

  • It would still be legal to spoil one’s ballot paper and not vote for any candidate

New cards
33

Arguments against Compulsory Voting

  • In a preferential voting system, where candidates need to be ranked, it may lead to many putting them down in order they are presented (donkey voting)

  • Undemokratisch to force people and should be a matter of choice

  • Wouldn’t stop politicians focusing their campaigns on marginal seats and neglecting safe seats

  • It doesn’t address the deeper reasons why people decide not to vote

New cards
34

Arguments for Prisoner Vote

  • Voting is a fundamental right and shouldn’t be removed

  • In Hirst v UK (2005), the ECHR ruled that a blanket ban on British prisoners exercising the right to vote is contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights. The court did not state that all prisoners should be given voting rights, but that the UK needed to justify its departure from universal suffrage

  • Losing the vote is unlikely to be a deterrent to crime

  • Losing the vote also removes civic responsibility from prisoners, which further alienates them from society and damages rehabilitation

New cards
35

Arguments against Prisoner Vote

  • Prisoners are criminals and have therefore forfeit the right to have a say in how society is run

  • Prisoners should have no say in the criminal justice system especially

  • Due to the nature of constituencies under FPTP, prison votes would have a significant impact on some constituencies

New cards
36

Voter Turnout in Elections (Participation Crisis)

  • Voter turnout in recent UK General Elections has been a great deal less than the average between 1945 and 1997, which was 76%

  • In the 2024 General Election it was just 59.8%

  • Turnout is even lower in so-called ‘second order’ elections and referendums such as those for devolved bodies and councils

  • Low turnout means gov is elected on a reduced share of the popular vote, calling the strength of the mandate into question

  • One explanation for lower voter turnout is political apathy; a lack of awareness/ interest in political issues

New cards
37

Party Membership (Participation Crisis)

  • Only 1.6% of electorate now belongs to a political party, compared to 3.8% in 1983 (differs party to party)

  • Tory Party has an estimated 100,000 members today, a significant drop from approx. 400,000 in mid 1990s

  • Labour Party’s membership fell from 500,000 under Corbin to 370,000 today

  • Less traditional political involvement could be associated with a negative perception of MPs, due to various scandals and promises being broke

New cards
38

Other Methods of Political Participation (Participation Crisis)

  • Other forms of political involvement are arguably less important - can be ignored

  • Suggests less confidence in political system

New cards
39

Elections (No Participation Crisis)

  • The 2014 Scottish Independence referendum and 2016 EU referendum had turnouts of 84.6% and 72.2% respectively, showing there is still significant engagement surrounding critical issues

  • Suggests population is engaged on important political issues but vote less in elections due to distrust of politicians (e.g. 2010 Expenses Scandal, Partygate, MP’s second jobs, etc.)

  • OR ‘Hapathy’ (happiness + apathy) - people are generally content and don’t need to push for change, explaining low turnout in 2001 an 2005 elections, when UK economy was in boom, but not low turnout of 2010 and 2024

New cards
40

Party Membership (No Participation Crisis)

  • Surge in Labour Party membership in 2015, when Milliband lowered fees to £3, with the party rising to over 500,000 members

  • Following Indyref1, membership of SNP surged - over 125,000 members in April 2018

  • Increase in membership of UKIP in run up to 2015 General Election, with nearly 50,000 members

  • Public will use parties as a vehicle for political action if they are proposing some kind of radical change - political action has shifted to single-issue politics

New cards
41

Other Methods (No Participation Crisis)

  • Pressure group membership has been on the increase

  • Many demonstrations have been well attended on issues such as the Iraq War (2001), Brexit and the climate crisis - direct action rather than conventional politics

  • Social media has allowed people - especially the young - to participate in politics online without engaging with it in the real world

  • E-petitions on specific political issues regularly receive hundreds of thousands of signatures, e.,g, Revoke Article 50 petition of March 2019 has over 5.5M signatures

New cards
42

Case Study: Protests for a Ceasefire in Gaza

  • Throughout 2024, consistent protests in London and across the UK for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and to put pressure on Israeli gov to end the war

  • Important in pressuring both Labour and Tory parties to weaken their support for the war, with Labour moving in Feb 2024 to support an ‘immediate humanitarian ceasefire’ and Tory foreign secretary David Cameron calling for de-escalation

New cards
43

Reforms to Improve Participation

  • Increase turnout by making it easier to vote; changing day of election from Thursday to weekend, allowing people to vote anywhere in their constituency, allowing voting to take place over several days

  • Encourage wider use of postal voting and introduce e-voting, BUT these increase risks of cyberattacks, voter fraud and intimidation

New cards
44

Scottish Independence Referendum (2014) Turnout

84.6%

New cards
45

Brexit Referendum (2016) Turnout

72.2%

New cards
46
New cards
robot