1/137
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
independent variable
the thing that is controlled and manipulated by the experimenter
dependent variable
the thing that is measured by the experimenter. it depends on the independent variable.
extraneous variable
variables other than the IV that might affect the DV
confounding variable
a variable that will always interfere with the effect of the IV - the results in a study can be explained by another factor
participant variables and how they are combatted
they are the differences between individual participants
controlled by random allocation and standardisation
random allocation
when ppts are randomly allocated to a condition in the study
standardisation
controlling the EVs to ensure only the IV is affecting the DV, establishing cause and effect - done by keeping both the conditions the same
situational variables
features of the environmental situation
demand characteristics and how they're combatted
when ppts try to work out whats going on in the experiment and so change their behaviour - their behaviour is no longer natural
combatted with single blind technique
single blind technique
When information about the study is withheld from the participants
order effects and how they're combatted
when ppts improve or worsen in a second test because they have practise/ are tired
combatted with counterbalancing/ random allocation/ randomisation
randomisation
making as many things as possible random
counterbalancing
where half the ppts are in condition a and then b, and the other half are in condition b and then a
investigator effects and how they're combatted
any unwanted influence of the investigator on the outcome
can be combatted with the double blind technique
double blind technique
where the aims of the study are witheld from both the ppts and researchers
aim
what the study is trying to find out - a general statement about what the experiment is looking at that doesnt predict what will happen
hypothesis
a precise and testable statement (or prediction) about the relationship between 2 variables
has 2 types
null hypothesis
a hypothesis that states theres no structural significance between two variables
alternate hypothesis
a hypothesis that suggests there is a structural significance between two variables
can either be directional or non-directional
directional hypothesis
states the way they predict the results will go
typically used in repeated research i.e they have an idea of what they expect to find
non-directional hypothesis
states that there is a difference but not what the difference will be
used in new research when the effects are unknown
Operationalization
making the variables in an investigation detailed and specific
sampling
the process of selecting a representative group of the population
a sample
the group of people who take part in an investigation, the ppts
the more representative the sample, the more generalisable, therefore the more ecologically valid
random sampling
each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected e.g pulling names from a hat
advantages of random sampling
unbiased and representative
helps control ppt variables
disadvantages of random sampling
time consuming
difficult to carry out with large populations
consent is still required
opportunity sampling
a sample containing anyone who is available at the time
advantages of opportunity sampling
quick and cheap in comparison to other methods
disadvantages of opportunity sampling
as it only uses people to are available, isnt representative of society in general
this also makes it biased
volunteer sampling
a sample of ppts who are willing to volunteer
often involves advertising the study e.g newspaper ad
advantages of volunteer sampling
minimal effort
if you place your ad in a certain location youll get your target population
most ethical - consent
disadvantages of volunteer sampling
less representative
volunteer bias
stratified sampling
provides a sample in proportional in terms of characteristics relevant to the population
identify subgroups and then take a random sample from each subgroup
advantages of stratified sampling
provides a very representative sample
disadvantages of stratified sampling
time consuming
expensive
people can still refuse to take part
experimental design
refers to how ppts are allocated to the different conditions in an experiment, 3 types :
independent measures
repeated measures
matched pairs
control condition
the condition of an experiment where nothing is manipulated so that we have a base line to compare our results with
experimental condition
where you manipulate a variable to see an effect
independent group design
different participants are used in each condition of the independent variable
advantages of independent group design
avoids order effects (ppts take part in one condition only)
no demand characteristics
disadvantages of independent group design
needs more ppts
participant variables have more of an effect
repeated measures design
the same ppts take part in each condition of the independent variable
advantages of repeated measures design
fewer ppts needed
less ppt variables
disadvantages of repeated measures design
order effects (can be overcome w/ counterbalancing)
demand characteristics
matched pairs design
where you have two independent groups, which are matched on relevant factors
advantages of matched pairs design
reduces ppt variables due to matching
avoids order effects
disadvantages of matched pairs design
time consuming to find closely matched pairs
impossible to match people exactly
reliability
the consistency of the findings
reliability in sampling methods, theres bias in ...
opportunity, random and volunteer sampling methods
results wont be consistent as the group of ppts will be different
reliability in experimental design, theres bias in ...
independent measures design
results arent consistent as there are participant variables
validity
the extent to which a test measures or predicts what it is supposed to
has two types : external and internal
external validity (and types)
whether our results can be generalised beyond the study
3 types : ecological, temporal + cultural
ecological validity
the extent to which results can be generalised to the real world
temporal validity
whether the results found in todays generation apply to studies 100 years ago
cultural validity
if people from other cultures behave in the same way
internal validity
whether the measures used in the experiment genuinely test what theyre meant to
researcher bias
when the researcher interprets the outcome of a study subjectively
ways to improve validity
reduce bias: EVs, standardisation, counterbalancing, reducing researchers bias etc.
be objective: ensure your variables arent open to interpretation
validity in sampling methods, theres bias in ...
opportunity, random + volunteer sampling
unrepresentative + ungeneralisable results
stratified sampling is proportional to the population and so is the most valid
validity in experimental design, theres bias in ...
repeated measures design
least valid due to demand characteristics + order effects
The British psychological society's guidelines
the BPS set out a code of guidelines:
respect for the autonomy, privacy + dignity of indivs and communities
scientific integrity
social integrity
maximising benefit and minimising harm
consent
the ppt must give permission to take part, knowing the true aims, nature and intended outcomes of the study
right to withdraw
ppts must have the option to leave the study and withdraw all of their data at any time
protection from harm
safeguarding ppts against any physical/psychological harm
confidentiality
not disclosing the identity of ppts
deception
when ppts have been told a false purpose for the research
this is sometimes needed to prevent the ppts acting in an unnatural way - misleading/lying to ppts
privacy
not invading ppts personal lives
debrief
this overcomes issues of consent and deception. The ppts are made aware of the true aims of the study, given the right to withdraw + offered counselling
overcoming ethical issues : informed consent
presumptive consent - gain informed consent from people taking part in the study and assume if these people give consent then your ppts would
overcoming privacy
only conduct the experiment in a public place
limitation
people may consent to things in advance but when it comes to doing the research they may not want to continue
overcoming a right to withdraw
always give ppts the right to withdraw at any point during the research - even if theyve been paid
overcoming protection from harm
not always possible to predict how harmful a piece of research will be so be ready to end early if needed/ offer counselling
overcoming confidentiality
always make a ppt unidentifiable. this means either giving them fake names/ a number
investigating vulnerable and young people
consent must be gained from parents/guardians/someone in a position of trust
experiment
where there is a manipulation of the IV to see what effect it has on the DV, while at the same time trying to control EVs (done in a controlled manner)
types of experiment and where theyre staged:
lab experiment - artificial environment
field experiment - naturalistic environment
natural experiment - examines a naturally occurring V in a real-life environment
key features of a lab experiment
IV is manipulated by the experimenter, DV is measured
all EVs are controlled
ppts know theyre in an experiment, even if they dont know the aim
advantages of lab experiments
can establish cause + effect due to controlled EVs, increasing internal validity
scientific, due to high levels of control
disadvantages of lab experiments
demand characteristics due to ppts being invited
unnatural setting, decreased ecological validity
key features of a field experiment
IV is manipulated by experimenter + DV is measured
less control over EVs due to natural setting
advantages of a field experiment
natural environment, behaviour is natural and ecological validity is high
some cause and effect as some EVs can be controlled
disadvantages of a field experiment
ethical issues due to lack of informed consent
not all EVs can be controlled due to real life environment
key features of natural experiments
occurs in real-life environment
has an IV + DV, but IV occurs naturally and isnt controlled by researcher
advantages of natural experiments
IV = naturally occurring and not manipulated
naturalistic and real environment = natural behaviour + therefore has high ecological validity
disadvantages of a natural experiment
participant variables
cant randomly allocate ppts
EVs are difficult to control
what is an interview and what are its types?
a non-experimental research method that doesnt directly manipulate the IV, it gains info from thoughts and feelings directly from the ppts + data is then analysed
3 types : structured, unstructured, semi-structured
advantage and disadvantage of interviews
+ = allows us to gather info + insight about a ppts feelings + beliefs which is hard to do in an experiment
- = issues w interviewer effects, social desirability bias
structured interviews
predetermined, standardised questions asked in a fixed order
advantages of structured interviews
gathers a lot of info from a large group of people quickly
requires little training
easy to replicate
disadvantages of structured interviews
gathers superficial info from ppts
doesnt allow ppts to answer freely
unstructured interviews
more like a conversation
no set questions
there is a general aim + interviewee is encouraged to expand and elaborate via interviewers prompts
advantages of unstructured interviews
gathers the most in-depth information
disadvantages of unstructured interviews
time consuming
analysis requires training
cant be replicated - not standardised
semi-structured interviews
similar to a job interview
list of qs set in advance but interviewers are also free to ask follow-up qs
advantages of semi-structured interviews
pre-set questions + gives ppts the chance to answer freely
always an in-depth exploration of an area
disadvantages of semi-structured interviews
time consuming to conduct
analysis requires some training
interview schedule
a list of set questions about the study aim
questionnaire
self-report technique that investigates people's beliefs, opinions and attitudes first hand
more flexible than an interview as an interviewer isnt needed to conduct research
diff types of q can be asked