1/67
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Common law
law created and developed by judicial opinion; Harm prevented was to the king
Statutory law
law created and developed by legislatures; Harm to society is prevented
Civil Law
legislate harm between individuals; remedy is usually monetary and based on injury and loss
Criminal Law
legislate harms to society; remedy is some sort of punishment
What are the four functions of law enforcement?
prevention (patrolling), investigation (evidence first), detection (special groups), and court preparation (write reports/testify)
What is the standard proof in a criminal case?
Beyond a reasonable doubt
What does beyond reasonable doubt mean?
To find someone guilty, all evidence must be reasonable beyond doubt
Burden of proof
duty to prove a disputed charge
What is the structure of the court system in NJ?
Municipal (speeding ticket), Superior (divorce), Appellate (appeal), NJ Supreme (2nd appeal)
The model penal code defines the standard proof for an arrest is…
probable cause
Probable Cause
evidence that there is a “fair probability” the suspect committed the crime
What is the purpose of bail?
incentive to insure the presence of the Defendant at future proceedings. If one fails to appear, their bail can be forfeited to the state
Bill of Rights
the first ten amendments to the constitution which define the powers of the government and the rights of the people
4th amendment
unreasonable search and seizures
5th amendment
protects against double jeopardy and self-incrimination
2nd amendment
protects the right to keep and bear arms
1st amendment
protects free speech, religion, and assembly
exceptions to the 1st amendment
speech which presents a “clear and present danger” and “fighting words”
8th amendment
prevents “cruel and unusual” punishments
14th amendment
makes BOR applicable to the states and mandates that laws provide due process and equal protection
due process
ensures basic procedural safeguards in place before the government deprives a person of life, liberty, or property
equal protection
all people should be treated equally with respect to the practice dealt with by the law
crime
an act or omission forbidden by law as a violation of the public interest
Civil wrongs (torts)
involve harm to an individual; remedy is to sue to recover for damages (preponderance of evidence)
Can an act violate both civil and criminal law?
True
Felony
serious crimes punishable by imprisonment of greater than a year
example of a felony
homicide, robbery, burglary
Misdemeanors
less serious crimes punishable by less than a year
example of misdemeanor
harassment, simple assault, minor theft
Basic elements of criminal culpability
actus reus, mens rea, unity of actus reus and mens rea, causation, a resulting social/societal harm
Actus reus
a willful and unlawful physical action
Mens rea
a guilty mind or intent
Strict liability
being responsible of a crime even without any requisite mental state or intent to commit the crime
What are the four mental states if every crime?
purposefully, knowingly, recklessly, and negligently
purposefully
voluntary wish to act a certain way to produce a certain result
knowingly
practically certain conduct will cause result
Recklessly
voluntarily ignores a substantial risk
negligently
should be aware that the substantial risk exists and will result
“But for” test
If it weren’t for the act, would the harm have been done?
proximate cause
no intervening factor occurred after the defendant’s act which removes the culpability from the defendant
What are the intervening factors of causation?
foreseeable and independent causes
foreseeable cause
events that occur which can be seen as a possible result of the defendant’s action; still liable
independent cause
event that occurs after original act that removes the liability of original act
Unity/Concurrence of Elements
state must prove that the voluntary act, mental stae, and causation all occurred BRD
accomplice
someone who knowingly and willingly associates and assists with another in the commission of a criminal offense (takes same accountability)
Actus reus of an accomplice
any physical or psychological purpose to contribute to crime
Mens rea of an accomplice
shows a purpose or specific intent that their act was to facilitate the crimes commission
How does an accomplice liability attach?
aid or assist primary actor, possess the purpose to support crime, and intend the primary party to commit crime
Entrapment
a defense used by a person saying they were tricked by someone into committing a crime
Entrapment defense
Did the police encourage a predisposed person or lured an innocent mind to commit?
Inchoate crime
detected and punished before the ultimate or intended crime is committed
attempts
intent to commit an act that if carried out would result in complete substantive crime (failure to commit counts)
actus reus of attempt
act must take some sory of action to further their plan
Substantial Step Test
Did you take a substantial step towards committing a crime?
Conspiracy
agreement between two or more people to commit an unlawful act
mens rea of conspiracy
parties must have intent to enter into agreement and that the object of the agreement be reached
actus reus of conspiracy
agreement to advance the intent
Overt Act Test
Did the parties take some sort of open/actual act which shows the conspiracy is alive and well?
Defense of crime
a set of identifiable conditions or circumstances which may prevent a conviction for an offense
a true or affirmative defense
looking at the person and the circumstance
justification defense
renders lawful conduct that would otherwise be criminal (defense of self, others, property, and crime prevention/ law enforcement
Self-defense
justified use of reasonable force by one who is not the aggressor when they believe it was necessary and perceived to be an unlawful imminent attack
deadly force
justified if reasonable belief such force is necessary to protect from deadly force (aggressor can become victim)
Excuse defenses
defendant violated the criminal law but there is some reason not to hold them personally liable (insanity, age and intoxication)
insanity
person is suffering from some sort of mental defect which makes them not culpable
The M’Naughten Test
All people are sane, however, was the defendant suffering a mental defect that they did not know the nature and quality of the act they are doing and if they did know, they did not know what they were doing was wrong
age excuse
party is too young to be held responsible (dependent on state)
intoxication excuse
voluntary intoxication is not an excuse, however can be if defendant was for to consume or had unanticipated reaction