psychology : bias in the courtroom - key study dixon

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/18

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

19 Terms

1
New cards

aim

to investigate the effect of accent, race and type of crime on assumptions of guilt

2
New cards

research method and design

  • lab experiment

  • independent measures

3
New cards

variables

  • iv : accent

  • iv 2 : race

  • iv 3 : type of crime

  • dv : rating of guilt

  • controls : using same actor and scripts

4
New cards

sample

  • 119 white undergrad psych students from the uni of Worcester

  • 24 males

  • 95 females

  • average age of 25

5
New cards

procedure

  • ppts listened to a 2 minute transcript of a conversation between a police officer and a suspect

  • suspect spoke with either a Brummie accent or a standard English accent

  • suspect was accused of either armed robbery (blue collar crime) or cheque fraud (white collar crime)

  • suspect was described by the officer as either black or white

  • ppts then rated guilt on a 7 point scale (innocent to guilty)

6
New cards

findings

  • brummie accent meant a higher rating of guilt

  • the brummie, black, armed robber was rated as the most guilty overall

7
New cards

conclusions

  • supports previous research done by seggie

  • accent does affect rating of guilt which implies that in a courtroom juries can be biased

  • but ‘attributions of guilt are generally made in a far richer evidential context than was provided … likely that strength of evidence will moderate any effect of accent on legal decision making’

  • in summary in a real courtroom there is more evidence and it is unlikely that accent plays a big part

8
New cards

validity

  • low ecological as not a real case and not real police officers or suspects

  • high internal as did test what it set out to test

9
New cards

reliability

  • high internal as standardised procedures used

  • low external as if you repeated the experiment with a more diverse sample you might not get the same results

10
New cards

sample and generalisation

  • relatively large sample of students

  • most likely from different areas

  • but would all be familiar with brummie accents

  • also all the same race

11
New cards

research method

  • lab experiment which means it was conducted in a controlled environment with standardised procedures

  • independent measures used so no order effects

12
New cards

practical applications

  • could be used in court systems to advise that accent and race could bias a jury

13
New cards

type of data

  • quantitative - guilt ratings on the 7 point scale

  • makes it easy to analyse and compare the different findings

14
New cards

freewill / determinism

  • deterministic as rating of guilt by ppts was determined by accent, race and type of crime

15
New cards

ethics

  • ethical

  • ppts gave informed consent, had the right to withdraw, weren’t deceived

16
New cards

reductionism / holism

  • reductionist as only looks at certain factors as a reason for how guilty someone is rated

17
New cards

socially sensitive research

  • is socially sensitive

  • could create stereotypes about race and accents e.g. that those with brummie accents are more violent / more likely to be guilty

18
New cards

situational / individual

  • situational

  • the guilt rating was impacted by the race, accent and type of crime committed

19
New cards

psych as a science

  • lab experiment using standardised procedures

  • so is scientific