1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
imperialism p1
Imperialism and imperial rivalry provided both a cause and context for World War I
Imperialism was driven by economic benefits, military interests and overall prestige
Generated rivalries and stimulated the rise of nationalism
Germanyâs desire for an empire in accordance with Weltpolitik, caused conflict with established colonial powers
The British Empire
Was the worldâs largest, richest and most dominant imperial power
Controlled 20% of the worldâs territory by 1900 and ruled the trading system with the East India Trading Company India, South Africa, Australia and parts of North Africa among others
France
A significant imperial power was the French
Held Indochina, some Pacific island and several colonies in Africa
Russia
Ruled many countries in Eastern Europe and had colonial interests in East Asia
Was the most powerful Slavic nation and was promoted as the defender of the Slavics
Thus, it defended Serbia and wanted to increase its influence in the Balkans for prestige and power
Germany
Unified in 1871, however Bismarck was not interested in colonies
When Kaiser Wilhelm II came into power, he colonised 995,000 km2 of land, which became known as German East Africa in 1891
His foreign policy, Weltpolitik, meant that Germany would attempt to extend its influence in the world via the acquisition of colonies and a large navy
This threatened British and French imperial interests
imperialism p2
The Scramble for Africa began during the 19th century as the European nations wanted colonies to secure sources of raw materials such as cotton, copper, iron, rubber, gold and diamonds, all of which were used to fuel their growing industrial economies
Impact of the Scramble for Africa
The French, Italians, British and Germans all increased their power and influence among other European nations
Caused competition for colonies in Africa between various European countries, thus fuelling rivalries o Created tensions as countries wanted economical gains and international prestige with an expanded empire
The Moroccan Crisis (1905) and the Agadir Crisis (1911) 63
Morocco, situated in North Africa, was considered primarily a French sphere of interest
When France attempted to establish more control over Morocco in 1905, Germany objected, claiming that it had to be consulted, as per Weltpolitik
When France ignored German demands, the German military threatened to attack France if its foreign minister was not replaced and if France refused to attend an international conference to resolve the matter
France complied and during the Algericas Conference held in Spain in 1906, Britain firmly supported its entente partner, forcing Germany to agree to allow France to extend further control over Morocco under certain minor conditions
The British were infuriated by the fact that the Kaiser wanted to undermine British friendship with France in the Moroccan Crisis of 1905
In 1911, the Agadir Crisis occurred as France sent troops to Morocco, causing Germany to proclaim the right to do the same in Southern Morocco
Again, Britain and France resisted German moves and demands, forcing Germany to accept 275,000 km2 of French Congo instead
The German government felt that it had been defeated and humiliated
This in-turn severely fractured German-French relations
alliances p1
An alliance is a formal political, military or economic agreement between two or more nations
Military alliances usually contain promises that in the event of war or aggression, one signatory nation will support the others
During the 19th and early 20th centuries European nations formed, annulled and restructured alliances on a regular basis
By 1914, the Great Powers of Europe had shuffled themselves into two alliance blocs
The existence of these two opposing blocs meant that war between two nations might mean war between them all
The impact of the alliance system as a cause of war is often overstated
Alliances did not, as is often suggested, make war inevitable
Alliances did not disempower governments or lead to automatic declarations of war; the authority and final decision to mobilise or declare war still rested with national leaders
It was their moral commitment to these alliances that was the telling factor.
alliances p2
Three Emperors League
This league was a three way alliance between the ruling monarchs of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia
The Three Emperorsâ League was engineered and dominated by the Prussian statesman Otto von Bismarck, who saw it as a means of securing the balance of power in Europe
Disorder in the Balkans undermined Russiaâs commitment to the league, which collapsed in 1878
The Three Emperorsâ League, without Russia, formed the basis of the Triple Alliance
The Dual Alliance (1879) 64
This was a binding military alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary, that required each signatory to support the other if one was attacked by Russia
It was signed after the collapse of the Three Emperorsâ League and during a period of Austro-Russian tension in the Balkans
The alliance was welcomed by nationalists in Germany, who believed that German-speaking Austria should be absorbed into greater Germany
The Triple Alliance (1882)
This complex three way alliance between Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy was driven by anti-French and anti-Russian sentiment
Each of the three signatories was committed to provide military support to the others, if one was attacked by two other powers â or if Germany and Italy were attacked by France
Italy, being newly formed and militarily weak, was viewed as a minor partner in this alliance
The Franco-Russian Alliance (1894)
This military alliance between France and Russia restored cordial relations between the two imperial powers
The Franco-Russian Alliance was in effect a response to the Triple Alliance, which had isolated France
The signing of the Franco-Russian Alliance was an unexpected development that thwarted German plans for mainland Europe and angered Berlin
It also provided economic benefits to both signatory nations, allowing Russia access to French loans and providing French capitalists with access to Russian mining, industry and raw materials
The Entente Cordiale (1904)
Meaning âfriendly agreementâ, the Entente Cordiale was a series of agreements between Britain and France
The Entente ended a century of hostility between the two cross-channel neighbours
It also resolved some colonial disagreements and other minor but lingering disputes
The Entente was not a military alliance; neither signatory was obliged to provide military support for the other
Nevertheless, it was seen as the first step towards an Anglo-French military alliance.
The Anglo-Russian Entente (1907)
This agreement between Britain and Russia eased tensions and restored good relations between the two nations
Britain and Russia had spent much of the 19th century as antagonists, going to war in the Crimea (1853-56) and later reaching the verge of war twice
The Anglo-Russian Entente resolved several points of disagreement, including the status of colonial possessions in the Middle East and Asia o It did not involve any military commitment or support.
The Triple Entente (1907)
This treaty consolidated the Entente Cordiale and the AngloRussian Entente into a three-way agreement between Britain, France and Russia
Again, it was not a military alliance â however the three Ententes of 1904-7 were important because they marked the end of British neutrality and isolationism.
militarism
Militarism is a philosophy or system that places great importance on military power
Militarism was a significant force in several European nations in the years prior to World War I
Militarism alone did not start World War I â that first required a flashpoint and a political crisis â but it created an environment where war, rather than negotiation or diplomacy, was considered the best way of resolving international disputes
Soldiers
There was an increase in defence expenditure in all major European powers especially after 1905, when a World War was looming
Between 1870 and 1914, military spending by European powers increased by 300% and conscription was adopted by all continental powers
By 1914, more than 12 million men could be called upon in the event of war
Substantial investment in increasing troop numbers in standing army
Triple Entente had a major advantage as it outnumbered the combined troops of the Dual Alliance by 1.5 million
Rate of increase standing armies of Entente nations were higher than Axis nations o Number of troops in standing army in 1914
Britain: 700,000
France: 1.1 million
Russia: 1.3 million
Germany: 800,000
Austria-Hungary: 800,000
Naval Arms Race o Decade before 1914, Germany aimed to build a navy which can challenge British naval supremacy
Britain seeks to retain their lead in naval supremacy and in 1906, launch a new class of battleships known as the HMS Dreadnought
This was a new standard of the modern battleship as it was fitted with large guns capable of destroying enemies from large distances
In 1908, Germany launched their own Dreadnoughts and thus began the naval arms race
By 1914, Britain had 29 Dreadnoughts and Germany had 17
nationalism p1
Nationalism is an intense form of patriotism in which individuals with nationalistic tendencies celebrated the culture and achievements of their own country and placed its interests above other nations ⢠Nationalism gave citizens an inflated confidence in their nation, government and military strength
It convinced them that their country was fair, righteous and without blame
Nationalist ideas demonised rival nations, caricaturing them as aggressive, scheming, deceitful, backward or uncivilised
It contributed to a continental delusion that suggested that a European war was both necessary and winnable
German Nationalism
The Franco-Prussian War that went from 1870 to 1871, resulted in German victory and French embarrassment
The 39 Germanic states were unified under the rule of Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, and a new superpower was born
The French were forced to sign the Treaties of Versailles and Frankfurt in 1871, which asked them to pay an indemnity of 5 billion marks and had to give the iron-rich territory of Alscace-Lorraine
There was a Prussian victory march through the streets of Paris, which added further humiliation to the French as the King of Prussia was proclaimed German Emperor in the Palace of Versailles, which marked the beginning of an era of German unification
This increased German pride and resulted in nationalistic feelings among the Germanic people
Political and socio-economic problems followed the defeat in France and a desire for revenge manifested among the people
Kaiser Wilhelm II coming into power in 1888 and his introduction of Weltpolitik catalysed the war, as the German people became fascinated with German imperial expansion in order to secure their âplace in the sunâ
Thus, it can be argued that nationalistic emotions reinforced the main rivalry of World War 1 between Germany and France
British Nationalism
Fuelled by a century of comparative peace and prosperity, British nationalism was at an all-time high as they had control over the largest empire and naval army
Englandâs âpenny pressâ was a collective term for cheap serialised novels,
It fuelled foreign rivalries by publishing incredible fictions about foreign intrigues, espionage, future war and invasion
âInvasion literatureâ was an example of propagating nationalism, as novels featured British soldiers overcoming the Germans and placing them at a much higher standard than the Russians and French, which increased nationalism
nationalism p2
Balkan Nationalism
No nationalist movement had a greater impact on the outbreak of war than the Slavic groups in the Balkans
Pan-Slavism, was the belief that the Slavic peoples of Eastern Europe should have their own nation, was a powerful force in the region
Sought to establish the principle of self-determination
Slavic nationalism was strongest in Serbia where it had risen significantly in the late 19th and early 20th centuries
Austria Hungary wanted to extend its control in the region and thus annexed Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1908 as it feared revolts from the Slavic people and attempted to quiet them down
Russia also wanted to increase its influence in the Balkans as it had an ideological commitment as it was the most powerful Slavic nation and thus promoted its image as the defender of all Slavic people
This increased Russian prestige and power and would limit the territorial expansion of its main rival, Austria-Hungary
The Ottomans had controlled the Balkans for centuries but in the late 19th and early 20th century, their power was in decline was colloquially known as âthe sick man of Europeâ
This created a power vacuum in the Balkans which left other superpowers such as Russia and Austria-Hungary to exploit it, while also increasing the confidence of the Slavicâs and other nationalities
The Italians launched an attack on Libya (part of the Ottoman Empire) in 1911 and defeated the Ottomans, which accentuated the weakness of the Empire to other countries and led to the Balkan Wars in 1912 and 1913
The instability in the region led to the first Balkan War in October 1912 as Serbia, Greece, Montenegro and Bulgaria gained independence from the Ottomans and formed the Balkan League
The Serbs, Greeks, Montenegrins and Bulgarians were all a product of nationalism as they advocated for their independence through the policy of national self-determination
Supported by the Russian empire, the league attacked Turkey and gained land gained land, with Serbia doubling its land size, but not gaining Albania, which was an outlet to the sea (Serbia remained landlocked)
Austria-Hungary supported the Ottomans as they were rivals with both Russia and Serbia
The Second Balkan War broke out in June 1913 when Bulgaria attacked its former allies Serbia and Greece as it was dissatisfied with its share of the spoils from the First Balkan Wars
Bulgaria was quickly dispatched by Serbia and co. and further strengthened Serbia into a force that was to be reckoned with, as it increased its overall territory by 80% 68
Austria-Hungary, allied with Germany and the Ottomans, sought to establish influence in the Balkans which is why it was rivals with Serbia
The strength of Serbia led to an increase in patriotism and nationalism among the Serbs, which resulted in a nationalistic Serbian group known as the Black Hand to murder the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary
Already looking for a reason to go to conflict, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia and due to their alliance systems, Germany came involved as well
Russia was then pressured into joining the war to support Serbia, and the other superpowers followed suit
It can be argued that the alliance systems was one of the major causes of First World War, but nations did not really have to abide by them, as exemplified by the fact that even though Italy was part of the Triple Alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary, they joined the Allies
Thus, it can be stated that the superpowers simply wanted to avoid a war on their own front and did not want to deal with the damages and repercussions that would arise from that
the july crisis
The July Crisis was a series of events in 1914 which ultimately led to the declarations of war by European Superpowers
Archduke Franz Ferdinand assassinated by Serbian nationalists on 28 June, 1914
The month-long period following the assassination became known as the âJuly Crisisâ
Flurry of meetings between Austro-Hungarian and German diplomats as they debated how to proceed and what might happen with regard to Russia if Austria declared war on Serbia
On July 5, Kaiser Wilhelm II issued his famous âBlank Chequeâ to the AustroHungarians: they could proceed as they saw fit, and Germany would back them if Russia intervened
The Kaiser believed Germany was more equipped and would be able to mobilise its forces much faster than Russia and France if they intervened and wanted to be able to crush their opponents before they had a chance to put up substantial resistance
The Kaiser urged his Austrian allies to deal with Serbia promptly and ruthlessly
On July 23, the Serbian government received an ultimatum from Austria-Hungary
In it was a set of ten demands, plus a requirement for the Serbs to respond in agreement within 48 hours
The term of the ultimatum was impossible to agree to and so Serbia immediately sought the counsel of the Russians
Tsar Nicholas II and his ministers offered to publicly condemn the ultimatum, but they were also aware that Russiaâs military readiness lagged behind Germanyâs, so refused to offer any military guarantees
The British foreign minister tried averting war by organising a mediation conference between all nations with a stake in the crisis, however this was rejected by both Germany and Austria.
Serbia responded to the Austrian ultimatum just before the expiration of the deadline
It submitted to most of the demands but rejected the Austrian-led inquiry demanded by point six, which it considered a breach of Serbian sovereignty
Thus, Austro-Hungarian emperor Franz Josef declared war on Serbia on July 28th
Russia, a long-time protector of Serbia, responded by mobilising its forces against Austria-Hungary
Germanyâs rulers declared war on Russia on August 1 and lit the fuse for their muchanticipated Schlieffen Plan, a scheme to invade France
On August 3, Germany declares war on France and invades Belgium as per the Schlieffen Plan
On August 4, Britain declares war on Germany and World War I officially begins
Germanyâs invasion of neutral Belgium triggered Britainâs involvement, which in turn dragged British dominions â Australia, New Zealand, Canada, India and South Africa â to declare war on Germany
Thus, the July Crisis and the failure of diplomacy was a direct short-term cause and was a catalyst the resulted in the outbreak of war