Simple Random Sample (SRS)
Label Individuals: assign #s/write names on slips
Randomize: random # generator (no repeats/unique)/put the names in a hat-shuffle
Select the group corresponding to these #s…
experimental units
what/who the treatments are imposed on (the students are assigned to eat ice cream)
treatments
what is done (or not done) to experimental units
Samples that lead to bias
convenience sample, voluntary response
Stratified Random Sample
splits population into strata (groups) and then creates a simple random sample from each strata (sample some from all groups); each starts has individuals with shared attributes or characteristics (homogenous groups)
Cluster Sample
sample all from same groups
Systematic Random Sample
choose a random starting point, use equal intervals
Undercoverage Bias
when some members of a population cannot or are less likely to be included in a sample
Nonresponse Bias
When an individual is part of a sample but chooses not to respond or they cannot be reached
Response Bias
pattern of inaccurate results (wording of question, interviewer, lying)
A sampling method produces the best estimates if there is (representative sample)
low bias and low variability
Census
collection of data from every individual or element in an entire population, as opposed to just a sample (better for small populations)
observational study
no treatments are imposed (put into effect); can’t determine causation, only show association
experimental
treatments are imposed, allows us to show causation
blinding
when subjects (single blind) and/or experinentors (double blind) don’t know about treatments
Placebo Effect
when a fake treatment works
Replication
Having many participants or volunteers in your experiment. This reduces the impact of differences from person to person.
Random Assignment
helps account for confounding variables through randomly choosing which participants are put in a group (shows causation)
Different samples
yield different estimates
larger samples
produce more accurate estimates
random sample and no random assignment
allows us to generalize our conclusions to the population that was sampled (observational)
Random Assignment
allows us to say a treatment causes change in the response (experiment)
statistically significant
when results from a study are too unusual to have occurred purely by chance (if the probability of something happens is less than 5%)
Types of experimental design
completely randomized, randomized block, matched pairs
Sampling Methods
SRS, stratified, systematic, cluster, convenience
Completely Randomized Design
subjects are randomly assigned to different treatment groups. This randomization ensures that each participant has an equal chance of being assigned to any group, eliminating biases and allowing for a straightforward comparison of treatments.
Randomized Block Design
subjects are divided into groups (or blocks) based on a specific characteristic (such as age, gender, or skill level) that may affect the outcome. Within each block, subjects are randomly assigned to different treatment groups. This design helps control for variability within blocks, leading to more precise estimates of treatment effects.
Matched Pairs Design
subjects are paired based on similar characteristics. Each pair is then assigned to different treatments. This design is particularly useful when the sample size is small, and it helps control for individual variability by comparing outcomes within pairs. (twin)
random assignment but not random sampling
you can show causation, but only within the specific sample tested—not the whole population
How to answer: what is the potential source of bias?
Name the bias (nonresponse, response, undercoverage) and say if it underestimates or overestimates