AP Gov - Unit 3 (Civil Liberties)

studied byStudied by 5 people
5.0(1)
Get a hint
Hint

Bill of Rights

1 / 35

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

36 Terms

1

Bill of Rights

The first Ten Amendments that gives rights to individuals

New cards
2

14th Amendment

Amendment that gives equal protection to citizens under state law

New cards
3

Due process clause

prevents the government from taking away individual liberties without the process of law (Legal proceedings)

  • designed to protect citizens from actions taken by state government, counties, towns, and cities.

New cards
4

equal protection clause

no state cannot deny equal protection under the law to anyone

New cards
5

Selective incorporation

a doctrine that ensures states cannot enact laws that deny citizens from the Bill of Rights

  • case-by-case approach to see what Bill of rights applies to states

New cards
6

1st Amendment

The amendment that protects, religion, speech, assmebly, petition, and press

New cards
7

Schneck vs US

Charles____ released pamphlets that told citizens to go against the draft during WWI. He was charged with violating the Espionage Act, which criminalized information that would prevent the success of the United States forces.

  • SCOTUS declared the Espionage Act did not violate the First Amendment. The clear and present danger test was created. Speech can be limited if it threatens substantive evil and the threat will likely happen.

  • A case that created the Clear and Present Danger test

  • Freedom of Speech

New cards
8

Limitations on Free Speech

incitement, defamation, fraud, obscenity, child pornography, fighting words, and threats

New cards
9

Tinker vs Des Moines

Students wore black armbands to show disdain over the Vietnam War.

  • SCOTUS ruled it did not violate the 1st Amendment. The students were not disrupting the normal operations of the school.

  • Gave students more rights

  • Freedom of Speech

New cards
10

NY Times vs US

New York Times and The Washington Post tried to publish the Pentagon Papers. However, the government tries to censor this based on prior restraint

  • SCOTUS ruled in favor of NY and said NY Times’ First Amendment rights were being violated.

  • Freedom of Press

New cards
11

Prior restraint

the government tries to restrict speech before it happens

New cards
12

NY Times vs Sullivan

The New York Times published an ad that criticized Alabama’s police department’s treatment of civil rights protestors. Not all statements were true and L.B. Sullivan argued that the ad had damaged his reputation and libel.

  • SCOTUS rules in favor of NYT. They stated NYT was protected under the 1st Amendment. Furthermore, to prove libel, there had to have been an intent of malice and disregard for the truth.

  • Freedom of Press

New cards
13

Engle vs Vitale

New York required public schools to start the day with a school prayer over the announcements. The law allowed students to absent themselves from this activity if they found it objectionable. Parents sued arguing this violated the 1st Amendment and Establishment Clause.

  • SCOTUS ruled in favor of the parents, that the law had violated the Establishment Clause.

  • Freedom of Religion

New cards
14

Wisconsin vs Yoder

Three Amish Families were forced to send their children until the 16. However, the three parents refused as attendance past 8th grade was against their religious beliefs of a simple life. This was brought forth under the Free Exercise Clause

  • SCOTUS rules in favor of the Amish parents. They had ruled that a high school education would most likely damage the religious upbringing. Furthermore, since the Amish are already well-established, the children would not harm society. The court argued that secondary schooling, which exposes children to attitudes, goals, and beliefs, would harm the children’s religious development.

  • Freedom of Religion

New cards
15

Lemon Test

A test where the government can only assist religion if:

  1. the primary purpose of the assistance is secular

  2. the assistance must neither promote nor inhibit religion

  3. there is no excessive entanglement between church and state

New cards
16

individual religious rights

Individuals are allowed to practice their religion as long as it does not disrupt the public nor govermental interest.

New cards
17

2nd Amendment

Grants citizens the right to bear arms

  • controversial with the “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state”

  • The Collective rights theory says that citizens do not have the individual right to possess a gun and possession of guns is left up to local, state, and federal.

New cards
18

Mcdonald vs Chicago

__________ and others challenged a Chicago law that banned new registration of handguns. This was brought under the violation of the Second Amendment. Does the Second Amendment apply to the states because it is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges and Immunities or Due Process clauses and thereby made applicable to the states?

  • SCOTUS ruled in favor of Otis and said the Amendment applies to states based on the due process clause.

  • This case allowed individuals the right to bear arms

New cards
19

4th Amendment

protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government

New cards
20

Mapp v Ohio

_________’s home was found to have obscene material which violated an Ohio law. However, her home was conducted under a warrantless search (the original search was for a fugitive) and therefore illegal.

  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of _____. They declared that the search had violated the Fourth Amendment, and thus the evidence found could not be used in state court.

  • This case ensured that people’s homes were not illegally searched by the government and protected

  • Created Exclusionary Rule

New cards
21

Exclusionary Rule

prevents the government from using evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution or in an illegal search and seizure

New cards
22

Terry vs Ohio

_____and two other men were observed by a plain clothes policeman in what the officer believed to be "casing a job, a stick-up." The officer stopped and frisked the three men, and found weapons on two of them. _______was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon and sentenced to three years in jail.

  • SCOTUS ruled that the officer was under the Fourth Amendment and that the weapons seized could be introduced into evidence against ________

New cards
23

Stop and frisk

If the police reasonably suspect that the suspect is armed and dangerous, the police may frisk the suspect

New cards
24

Privacy vs Security

involves your right to manage your personal information, and security is the protection of this information

  • concerns over keeping the U.S. safe against foreign attacks and privacy

  • NSA and bulk metadata collection - mass wiretaps on phone calls across the control after 9/11. Concern was about terrorism

New cards
25

Public Safety vs Individual Rights

Main concern over gun control and gun ownership. How much control does the government have over public safety before infringing on individual rights?

New cards
26

Patriot Act & US Freedom Act

response to 9/11 and gave police authority to federal, state, and local governments to interdict, prosecute, and convict suspected terrorists

  • US Freedom Act banned it

New cards
27

5th Amendment

  • right to jury trial when charged with a crime

  • guarantees the right to a grand jury (jury that decides if a procedure committed a crime and should have trial)

  • forbids “double jeopardy” (no one can be prosecuted twice for the same crime)

  • protects against self-incrimination

  • protection from the government taking property without compensation

New cards
28

Miranda vs Arizona

_______ was arrested and brought to the police station where he was questioned by police officers in connection with a kidnapping and rape. The police officers admitted that they had not advised _______ of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. __________wrote a confession, which was used as evidence, and then found guilty.

  • SCOTUS found this violated the 5th Amendment. The defendant has to be warned that they have the right to remain silent and that they have the right to an attorney. Known as _________Rights

New cards
29

6th Amendment

gives citizens a series of rights in criminal trials

  • rights to a fast and public trial by an impartial jury

  • aware of the criminal charges

  • confront witnesses during the trial

  • to have witnesses appear in the trial

  • right to legal representation

New cards
30

Gideon v. Wainwright

Clarence Earl Gideon was charged with committing a robbery and entering and breaking. However, he could not afford a lawyer and requested that the court provide him with one. The court did not appoint him one as under Florida law, a lawyer is only provided in capital cases.

  • The Supreme Court ruled in Gideon’s favor. States had to provide free legal assistance in serious trials. Under the 6th Amendment and 14th Amendment, states are required to provide assistance counsel.

  • Sixth Amendment - Right to Counsel Clause

  • 14th Amendment - Due Process Clause

  • The effects of this case was that it gave proper defense to any American citizen. It had declared that legal assistance was fundamental and essential to a fair trial.

New cards
31

8th Amendment

prohibits cruel, unusual punishments, “excessive fines/bail”

New cards
32

capital punishment

execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense

  • aka Death Punishment

New cards
33

9th Amendment

guarantees that rights that are not specifically written in the Constitution may be retained by the people

New cards
34

Griswold vs Connecticuit

An executive director at Planned Parenthood handed out contraceptives, which was illegal under a Connecticuit law. This was brought forth under the 14th, 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 9th Amendment

  • SCOTUS ruled in favor of Griswold, stating that the law had violated the right to privacy. The decision to use contraceptives was a marital privacy. Therefore, the state could not regulate it.

  • Establishes “Right to Privacy”

New cards
35

Roe v Wade

_______ was denied an abortion under a Texas law, which made abortion illegal.

  • Freedom of Assembly, Secure in their persons, Elastic clause for individual rights, Due process clause

  • SCOTUS ruled that the privacy of a woman fell under the 14th Amendment through the Due Process Clause. It also protects a woman’s choice to have an abortion or not. The decision to have an abortion is act of privacy between the woman and her doctor.

New cards
36

Miranda Rights

Legal requirement for offenders to be read their 5th and 6th Amendment rights

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 78 people
... ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 64 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 317 people
... ago
4.9(21)
note Note
studied byStudied by 14 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 6 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 17 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 64 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 23066 people
... ago
4.8(187)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (65)
studied byStudied by 5 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (31)
studied byStudied by 5 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (50)
studied byStudied by 1 person
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (48)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (32)
studied byStudied by 14 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (39)
studied byStudied by 32 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (46)
studied byStudied by 7 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (66)
studied byStudied by 85 people
... ago
5.0(2)
robot