1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Differentiate between forms of inclusion and exclusion
inclusion forms:
maximal: constantly want to be around this person; actively try to make sure to hang out
active: like being around another person but won’t change their initial plans to hang out with them
passive: not going out of one’s way to spend time with another person but happy to hang out with them
ambivalence: not happy to see them but don’t cut them out
exclusion forms:
passive: don’t want to hang out with them and tries to avoid the same environment as them
active: avoid the person, try to end ASAP
maximal: avoiding that person at any cost, actively removing oneself from the situation
Explain the findings of the study looking at the impact of different forms of inclusion & exclusion on self-esteem
mild rejection = major rejection
the more one is maximally excluded their self-esteem would lower severely
the more one is maximally included their self-esteem would go higher
Explain the method and findings of the “Introducing Self to Stranger” study
introductions to strangers in which participants had to continue to talk about themselves until instructed to do so; at the one minute intervals one would receive the other participants’ answers to the question on how much would you like to get to know the person that is speaking on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (very much)
> positive throughout the introduction has more positive effects
> negative throughout the introduction has more negative effects
> some interactions started off negative but ended up positive
> some interactions started off positive but ended up negative
relational devaluation: most hurt when a positive review changes to negative
Identify similarities of physical pain and rejection
fMRI imaging study: areas of the brain lit up as it would for physical pain
acetaminophen study: pills reduced physical pain
Identify the results of the time study on ostracism
ostracism: intentionally ignoring or ignored by those around you
different views
→ actors → effective punishment and goal achieved
→ targets → damaged relationship
time study: participants calculate the time in which they got either rejected or accepted by the researchers
40 sec passed for each individual
rejected individuals say that the time passed was on average of 64 seconds
non-rejected individuals say that the time passed was about 42 seconds on average
Differentiate between how people with high and low self-esteem response to be ostracized in their romantic relationships
compliance and prosocial
hostility
look elsewhere
> high self-esteem: end the relationship
> low self-esteem: reciprocate ostracism
Explain what reactive and suspicious jealousy are and examples of each
reactive jealousy: realistic response in which an individual reacts based on evidence that they can prove and provide
example: infidelity in which one partner sees the flirty texts messages that the other was sending to another person
suspicious jealousy: no event or evidence that can prove their suspicions of another individual
example: thinking that one’s partner is cheating on them because they have a “feeling” that something is going on
Identify who is more prone to being higher in jealousy
higher interdependency
> lower CL alt
feel inadequate in relationship
people who possess a higher mate value discrepancy
mater value discrepancy: high on mate value; men see higher mate value in women based on physical attractiveness while women see mate value in men in economic factors
preoccupied attachment
partner is high in dark triad
Differentiate between how heterosexual men, heterosexual women, and lesbian/gay/bisexual individuals response to infidelity
heterosexual men: get drunk, confront and threaten the other person
heterosexual women: seeks to improve the relationship or compete with partner
LBG: emotional reactions
Explain how motivated liars differ with their lies compared to non-motivated liars
types
active: countering of what actually happened
passive: concealing information
purpose
self-serving: benefit the lair in situation
benefit other: trying to protect interest of the other person
motivated lairs typically have more convincing scripts, poorer more suspicious delivery
non-motivated liars engage in situations in which it seems they get caught upon the lie, lie for the well-being of another person, has not ill intention
Identify what the reliability of lie detection is and how knowing the person impacts this
non consistent verbal or nonverbal cues
know VS unknown
> 54% detection, worse if known
> truth bias: tendency to a person that is much closer to you
Distinguish between who men and women are more likely to betray
men: romantic partner and business
women: friends and family
Identify the impact the seeking revenge for being betrayed has on a person and their relationships
can inflict more harm than good → vengeful cycle
less satisfying than believe
> distressed and negative longer