spatial pattern of hazard risk in california
there is a higher risk of hazards risk in the west coast of California because there is a linear pattern of hazards including earthquakes, landslides, and wildfires.
As you cross the central valley to the west the risk decreases with dispersed wildfires. As you go up north the hazard risk of wildfires increase
Volcsno risk is an anomaly they are distributed at regular intervals
hydro-meterorological hazards
Hydro-meteorological hazards result from atmospheric or hydrological processes; they are caused by the movement of water in some shape or form, and by weather patterns. Examples can include floods, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, storms, blizzards, and more.
they are higliy connected which increases their frequency
geophyscial hazard
Natural hazards where the causal factor is a geological or geomorphological process
less connection therefore not as frequent
why do people choose to live in california even though its a risky place
richest oil wells in america
film industry
good weather
high technology
sentimental attachment
economic growth draws internal and external migration
are there any factors which make people vulnerable to these hazards in california?
buil on fault line
building or moving to laces with highly flammable vegetation
choosing to live underneath cliff for the surf life
factors to reduce hazard vulnerabiliy in calfiornia
earthquake resistant design
emergency servies and planning
common casue and community resistance
retrofitting e.g cathedral designed to withstand seismic waves
peoples reactions to the threat of hazards in california
they accept it but rather not think about it
confidence in adaption
faulty-denail as opposed to ignorance but too many interlinked risks to calculate accurately
blame people rather than nature
what was the pattern of frequency and cost in california 2008-2018
higher the frequency,the higher the cost
most frequent hazards are floods,landslides ,storms and wildifres
least frequent hazards are earthquakes and tsunamis
wildfires cost FEMA the most ($709m)
earthquakes and tsunamis hardly cost anything
San francisco bay area economy
home to california supreme court ,bank of america,filled with numerous web 2.0 startups and headquarters
growth occuring in healthhs,social services and education and leisure
booom growth in proffessional and businesses
decline in manufacturing employment
67% labour force participation
strong personel income growth
employment in higher paid jobs is growing
how the nature of the hazard can influence the potential impacts on the bay area
scale greater than 6mms
2 faults (San Andreas and heyward)
frequency c.150 years on
Heyward overdue
The last big one 1868
san andreas interact with slopes (landslides and can trigger wildfires
demography
7.65m people
highly educated workforce
continuing foreign immigrstion ,revitilized in-migration of workers seeking opportunities in the regions expanding economy and a baby boom population
how the characteristics of the bay area influence the potential impacts of a hazard
coastal,hilly therefore land slides and floods
soft sediment (liquefaction)
dense population therefore transport infrastructure most vulnereable
pressure on most vulnerable land and pockets of poverty-highesdt risk for minorities
rich often on surrounding slopes often well engineered
how politics and hazard perception can influence the potential impacts of the hazard
faulty-deny risk
democrats dominate
local government believes in government action
focused on public engagement to improve hazard response
however, opposed to developments that might disrupt communities
how community response and management can influence the impacts of the hazard?
FEMA/california governor office/community groups cooperate to produce-Bay area earthquake plan California
residents taught to
store supplies
families contact plan
stop covering and hold
4 task forces:
manage and repair infrastructure
healthcare planning, family unification
rehoming displaced residents
communication during and after an event