7.4.6 - High Availability Clusters

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/8

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards about High Availability Clusters

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

9 Terms

1
New cards

High Availability Clusters

Allows multiple redundant processing nodes that share data with one another to accept connections. If one node fails, connections failover to a working node. To clients, it appears as a single server.

2
New cards

Virtual IP

The public IP used to access a service that is shared between two instances in a cluster.

3
New cards

Common Address Redundancy Protocol (CARP)

Enables the active node to "own" the virtual IP and respond to connections, using a heartbeat mechanism for failover.

4
New cards

Active-Passive Clustering

One node is actively processing connections while the other is on standby, ready to take over if the active node fails. Advantage: Performance is not affected during failover.

5
New cards

Active-Active Clustering

Both nodes are processing connections concurrently, maximizing hardware capacity. Disadvantage: Performance degradation can occur during failover due to the increased workload on the remaining node.

6
New cards

N+1 and N+M configurations

Provisioning fewer passive nodes than active nodes to reduce costs in an active-passive configuration.

7
New cards

Redundancy Protocol (e.g., CARP)

What type of protocol runs on the private connection between instances in a high availability cluster to enable the active node to "own" the virtual IP and respond to connections?

8
New cards

Performance is not adversely affected during failover

What is the main advantage of active/passive configurations in high availability clusters?

9
New cards

Active-Active Clustering

In what type of clustering configuration: the workload of the failed node is immediately and transparently shifted onto the remaining node, leading to potential performance degradation?