1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
history
change
Acts as a stimulus for us to think historically and explore new directions.
Provides branches of development, while we produce the outcomes.
Can be gradual (almost unnoticeable) or drastic (sudden and transformative).
continuity
We owe it to our roots.
Provides stability and a sense of historical progression.
multiple causation
No single event has just one cause—every event has multiple causes.
History must explore various contributing factors rather than looking for one definite cause.
There is no absolute answer to historical questions.
significance
The importance or value of an event is relative rather than fixed.
There is no absolute right or wrong interpretation.
Objectivity is a myth—humans are naturally subjective, and this influences our conclusions.
We assess significance based on a particular reference point or perspective.
source and evidences
These are the cornerstones of historical understanding—we must have a basis for our claims.
___ are the original materials; however, they require interpretation within historical studies.
A source alone is not enough—it must be transformed into ____ to support historical arguments.
framework
Serves as a guide in historical interpretation.
There is no universal ___ —we must clearly define the one we use.
context
Essential for meaning-making in history—understanding an event requires placing it within its proper time, place, and cultural setting.
political, economic, socio-cultural
3 basic framework
past events
basic unit of study
anachronism
Happens when we apply modern values, beliefs, or standards to judge the past.
Example: Calling ancient leaders "bad" for not following democracy, even though democracy didn’t exist then.
🔹 It distorts history by ignoring the context of the time.
methods and perspectives
2 types of historiography
No document, no history
Pantayong Pananaw
perspective
A perspective that views history from the viewpoint of Filipinos for Filipinos. Internal Discourse (Maka-Pilipino, Bakas)
bagong kasaysayan
method
explore much sources as possible
moves away from traditional, document-based history (positivist history).
pangkaming pananaw
An internal perspective, but the intended audience is outsiders.
kasaysayang bayan
direction
struggles, experiences, and perspectives of ordinary Filipinos rather than just elites or colonial rulers.
triapartite view of philippine history
This refers to a three-part division of Philippine history based on a nationalist perspective:
Katutubong Panahon (Pre-Colonial) – A time of independent Filipino communities.
Panahon ng Pananakop (Colonial Period) – A period of foreign domination and resistance.
Panahon ng Paglaya (Period of Liberation) – The struggle for independence and nation-building.
sources coming from the actual period
materials from actors/participants or witnesses
by people or groups directly involved in the event or topic being studied
Works that interpret, analyze, or summarize primary sources.
the “testimony of anyone who is not an eyewitness—that is of one who was not present at the event of which he tells” s
studies digesting, interpreting or using primary sources
provide a map and relevant information on the primary sources
context and content analysis
2 types of historical method: source analysis
context analysis
focuses on understanding the background and setting of a historical source. Examines the who, when, where, and why of a source.
Time & Place – When and where was it created?
Situation – What were the social norms at the time?
Historical Context – What was happening in society?
Author’s Role & Intent – Was the author involved? What was their purpose?
Authority & Relevance – Does the author have credibility?
content analysis
looks at the actual message and claims in the source. Analyzes the claims, arguments, and biases of a source.
Main Idea – What is the key argument?
Evidence – Are claims backed by facts?
Corroboration – Do other sources agree?
Perspective & Bias – Is the author neutral or influenced by personal views?
Understanding the order of events and cause-effect relationships.
historical comprehension
Grasping the meaning of historical texts, sources, and events.
historical analysis & interpretation
Evaluating perspectives, biases, and significance of events.
historical research capabilities
Using sources to investigate and draw conclusions.
historical issues
Identifying debates, conflicts, and differing viewpoints in history.
single understanding
There is no ___ _____ of truth in history.
history
_____ is composed of competing, sometimes conflicting arguments and viewpoints and is always changing.
eyewitnesses
Primary sources provide a glimpse of particular historical period from the lens of _____
kasaysayan
n deviates from the traditional/positivist history by putting emphasis on sense-making from a pro-Filipino perspective.
rizal’s inspiration
Why study RIPH?
Deeper Understanding of the past
Strengthening Filipino Identity
Guiding the Future
historical thinking skills
Essential for critical analysis, especially in Society 5.0 (technology-driven era).