1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
description of the theory
Tripartite Personality & Superego (Freud)
Personality has 3 parts: Id (instinct), Ego (reality), Superego (morality).
Superego develops during the phallic stage through identification with the same-gender parent after resolving the Oedipus/Electra complex.
Superego punishes the Ego via guilt and rewards it via pride.
If the Superego is inadequate, the Id is unchecked → increases risk of offending.
Three Types of Inadequate Superego (Blackburn, 1993)
Weak Superego
Due to absence of same-gender parent during the phallic stage
Prevents internalisation of moral values → no guilt → offending likely
Deviant Superego
Superego internalised from a criminal or immoral parent
The child feels no guilt for wrongdoing → offending is morally acceptable
Over-Harsh Superego
Extremely punitive upbringing → child feels constant guilt and anxiety
May unconsciously seek punishment through criminal behaviour to satisfy Superego
Emotional Drivers in Offending
Offending seen as emotionally driven, especially by unconscious guilt, anxiety, and the desire for punishment.
The role of emotion is unique to the psychodynamic approach compared to other theories (e.g. cognitive or learning theories).
maternal deprivation
Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis (Bowlby, 1944)
Secure emotional bond with a mother figure in early years is essential for healthy psychological development.
Failure leads to irreversible emotional damage, particularly affectionless psychopathy:
Lack of guilt, empathy, or remorse → increased risk of delinquent behaviour
44 thieves study
44 Juvenile Thieves Study (Bowlby, 1944)
Sample: 44 juvenile thieves & a control group.
14 classified as affectionless psychopaths, and 12 of those had experienced maternal separation.
Only 2 in the control group had similar separation.
Bowlby concluded prolonged maternal deprivation → increased risk of delinquency and emotional dysfunction.
Research Support (Superego) + counterpoint
Goreta (1991): Freudian analysis of 10 offenders → all showed signs of Superego disturbance, with unconscious guilt and desire for self-punishment.
Supports link between an over-harsh Superego and criminal behaviour.
COUNTERPOINT
Kochanska et al. (2001): Harsh discipline → children more likely to be rebellious, less guilty, less self-critical.
Contradicts the idea that a harsh Superego leads to guilt and offending.
Weakens support for Superego-based offending
Gender Bias in Freud’s Theory
Freud claimed girls have a weaker Superego due to lack of castration anxiety and weaker identification with their mothers.
Implies women should offend more — but men are far more likely to be imprisoned.
Hoffman (1975): Girls often showed stronger moral behaviour than boys.
Suggests Freud’s theory contains alpha bias and is outdated.
Questionable Causality in Maternal Deprivation
Hilda Lewis (1954): Studied 500 young people → no strong link between maternal deprivation and later offending.
Bowlby’s findings are correlational, not causal. Other factors (e.g. poverty, neglect, trauma) may explain both separation and delinquency.
Undermines Bowlby’s theory as a standalone explanation for offending.
Emotional Focus & Lasting Contribution
Strength: Psychodynamic theory was first to link early childhood and emotion with offending.
Focus on guilt, anxiety, unconscious motives adds depth to our understanding of criminal behaviour.
Although outdated, it influenced modern theories on early intervention and attachment in preventing crime.