Bioethics Flashcards

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/49

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key concepts and cases in bioethics.

phi 015 new

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

50 Terms

1
New cards

What is Radcliffe Richards' main argument regarding organ donation?

We should allow more ways for people to donate organs to save lives, with fewer restrictive rules.

2
New cards

What is a key point from Arras's 'A Case Approach'?

Ethical problems should be solved using real-life examples in a 'bottom-up' approach.

3
New cards

According to Burton, what did Dax Cowart's case demonstrate?

Patients have the right to refuse treatment, even if it leads to death; autonomy is paramount.

4
New cards

What is Sinnott-Armstrong & Miller's main argument about killing?

Killing is wrong because it causes the loss of abilities, not just life itself.

5
New cards

What do Roberts argue is the primary cause of racial health disparities?

Racism and inequality, not biology or genetics.

6
New cards

What are the four principles of Beauchamp's Principlism in Bioethics?

Respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice.

7
New cards

According to Young, what is autonomy in the context of medical choices?

Making decisions based on your own values, free from coercion.

8
New cards

What are the three requirements for informed consent?

Competence, understanding the information, and freedom to choose.

9
New cards

What was the primary purpose of the Nuremberg Code?

To prevent Nazi-style atrocities and improve ethical standards in human research.

10
New cards

What was a major ethical violation in the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments?

Violation of informed consent and basic human rights; patients were not treated for syphilis.

11
New cards

What was the ethical issue in the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Study?

Elderly patients were injected with live cancer cells without their informed consent to study how weakened bodies fight cancer.

12
New cards

What was the significance of the Karen Ann Quinlan case?

It was the first major U.S. case about the right to refuse life support, establishing legal and ethical standards for end-of-life decisions.

13
New cards

What did Brittany Maynard's case emphasize regarding end-of-life decisions?

Autonomy, dignity, and control in dying; she advocated for Death with Dignity laws.

14
New cards

Why did the Jahi McMath case spark controversy?

It raised questions about how we determine when someone is really dead, particularly in cases of brain death.

15
New cards

What right did Elizabeth Bouvia argue for in her case?

The right to refuse treatment, specifically the right to stop being force-fed through a feeding tube.

16
New cards

What is the central idea of consequentialism?

The rightness or wrongness of an action depends only on its outcomes (consequences).

17
New cards

What defines utilitarianism as a type of consequentialism?

The right action is the one that produces the most happiness (or well-being) for the most people.

18
New cards

What are the four basic moral principles used in principlism?

Autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

19
New cards

What is the difference between casuistry and principlism in bioethics?

Casuistry is a 'bottom-up' approach starting with cases, while principlism is a 'top-down' approach starting with ethical theories.

20
New cards

What are the three conditions for informed consent to be valid?

Competence, understanding and appreciation of information, and voluntariness.

21
New cards

Name three exceptions to the requirement of informed consent.

Emergency, waiver, and therapeutic privilege.

22
New cards

Explain the Doctrine of Double Effect.

Doing something good can be okay even if it causes harm, as long as the harm is not intended and the good effect is greater.

23
New cards

What is the difference between euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide?

In euthanasia, the doctor actively ends the patient’s life. In physician-assisted suicide, the doctor provides the means, but the patient takes the final action.

24
New cards

List Beauchamp and Childress's four major principles of morality.

Respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice.

25
New cards

What does the concept of 'social construction' mean in relation to race?

Race is a socially constructed category with no deep biological meaning.

26
New cards

What is the difference between normative and descriptive statements?

Descriptive says what is, while normative says what should be.

27
New cards

Which of the following is NOT one of the principles in the principlism framework: a. Nonmaleficence b. Justice c. Informed consent d. Beneficence

C. Informed Consent

28
New cards

Which of the following is NOT a bedside principle, that is, it is not applied in the one-on-one interaction of clinician and patient? a. Nonmaleficence b. Justice c. Respect for autonomy d. Beneficence

B. Justice

29
New cards

Arras contrasts casuistry with principlism saying it is a bottom up approach rather than top down. What does this mean?

Casuistry starts with cases and works toward principles

30
New cards

The distinction between doing and allowing says:

Causing harm X is morally worse than merely allowing harm X to come

31
New cards

The Doctrine of Double Effect says:

this means that doing something good can be okay even if it also causes harm, as long as the harm was not intended and the good effect is greater.

32
New cards

What does Radclifee-Richards argue about organ donation?

We should have a default presumption in favor of organ donation; deviations from this default warrant justification.

33
New cards

What is directed donation?

When the organ donor specifies whom they would like to receive the organ.

34
New cards

Social constructionism about race says:

Race is a socially constructed construct with no meaningful biological reality

35
New cards

Biological race realism/race naturalism says:

Race are real, discrete biological categories that humans fit into

36
New cards

What is a social determinant of health? What are some examples?

Social Determinants of Health are everyday factors like where you live, work, learn, and how much money you make that affect your health. Examples include discrimination, access to healthcare, your job, education, and housing.

37
New cards

How does casuistry differ from principlism in ethical decision-making?

Casuistry starts with real-life cases and builds general ideas (bottom-up), while principlism starts with main ethical rules and applies them to cases (top-down).

38
New cards

Provide examples of normative and descriptive statements.

Normative: Says what should or shouldn't happen (e.g., 'You shouldn't litter.'). Descriptive: Describes facts with no opinion (e.g., 'There is trash on the ground.').

39
New cards

List the four principles of bioethics.

Autonomy: People can choose their own medical care. Beneficence: Help others and do good. Nonmaleficence: Don't cause harm. Justice: Be fair to everyone.

40
New cards

Explain the difference between 'doing' and 'allowing' in ethical terms.

Doing: You act and cause something. Allowing: You let something happen by not acting. Doing is usually seen as worse.

41
New cards

What is 'reflective equilibrium' in the context of ethical decision-making?

Balancing all principles to make the most fair and logical ethical choice.

42
New cards

What is 'specification' in ethical decision-making?

Making general principles more specific for each case and deciding how much each principle applies in a situation.

43
New cards

Define 'paternalism' in the context of healthcare.

When doctors make decisions for the patient instead of letting them decide.

44
New cards

Explain the concept of 'justice' as a population-level principle.

Justice is about treating all groups fairly and not discriminating.

45
New cards

Name the three essential components of informed consent.

Competence - mentally able to decide, Understanding - understands info, Voluntariness - not pressured by medical staff

46
New cards

List three exceptions to the requirement of informed consent.

Emergency - no time to ask, Waiver - patient gives up the choice, Therapeutic privilege - info is held back to prevent harm

47
New cards

What is a common critique of casuistry?

It's seen as too focused on the past and may stop progress.

48
New cards

What is Arras's argument in favor of casuistry?

He argues casuistry uses reasoning people understand, not strict logic.

49
New cards

What was Dax Coward's case centrally about?

A patient’s right to refuse life saving treatment

50
New cards

What was the Elizabeth Bouvia case centrally about?

a patients right to request physician assisted death