1/28
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Validity
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises (no possible situation where premises are true and conclusion is false).
Soundness
A valid argument with all true premises.
Standard Form A
All S are P.
Standard Form E
No S are P.
Standard Form I
Some S are P.
Standard Form O
Some S are not P.
Square of Opposition
Shows logical relationships (contraries, subcontraries, contradictories).
Conversion
Switch S and P (valid for E and I).
Obversion
Change quality (A ↔ E, I ↔ O) and replace predicate with its complement (valid for all).
Contraposition
Switch S and P and replace both with complements (valid for A and O).
Negation
~ : Negation
Conjunction
· : Conjunction (and)
Disjunction
v : Disjunction (or)
Conditional
⊃ : Conditional (if...then)
Biconditional
≡ : Biconditional (if and only if)
Logical Truth
Always true.
Contradiction
Always false.
Contingency
Sometimes true.
Modus Ponens
MP: Modus Ponens (P ⊃ Q, P ⊢ Q)
Modus Tollens
MT: Modus Tollens (P ⊃ Q, ~Q ⊢ ~P)
Disjunctive Syllogism
DS: Disjunctive Syllogism (P v Q, ~P ⊢ Q)
Hypothetical Syllogism
HS: Hypothetical Syllogism (P ⊃ Q, Q ⊃ R ⊢ P ⊃ R)
Simplification
SIMP: Simplification (P · Q ⊢ P)
Conjunction
CONJ: Conjunction (P, Q ⊢ P · Q)
Addition
ADD: Addition (P ⊢ P v Q)
Double Negation
DN: Double Negation (~ ~P ⊢ P)
DeMorgan's
DeM: DeMorgan's (~(P · Q) ≡ ~P v ~Q; ~(P v Q) ≡ ~P · ~Q)
Conditional Proof
Assume antecedent, derive consequent, discharge to form implication.
Indirect Proof
Assume negation of conclusion, derive a contradiction, discharge assumption as false.