Levels of Economic Integration
Free trade Area
Customs Union
Common Market
Economic Union
Political Union
Free Trade (FTA)
No tariffs between members, but independent trade policies (e.g., NAFTA/USMCA).
1/74
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Levels of Economic Integration
Free trade Area
Customs Union
Common Market
Economic Union
Political Union
Free Trade (FTA)
No tariffs between members, but independent trade policies (e.g., NAFTA/USMCA).
Customs Union
FTA + common external trade policy (e.g., Mercosur).
Common Market
Customs union + free movement of labor/capital (e.g., EU Single Market).
Economic Union
Common market + shared economic policies (e.g., Eurozone).
Political Union
Full integration (e.g., USA, proposed EU federalization).
EFTA (European Free Trade Association)
Scope:* FTA (no customs union).
- Members: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland.
*Single European Act (1986)
Removed trade barriers, created EU Single Market.
Euro (€) Adoption
EU members not using the euro:** Denmark, Sweden, Poland, Hungary, Czechia, Romania, Bulgaria.
*NAFTA (Now USMCA)
Scope:** FTA between U.S., Canada, Mexico.
Mercosur**
Scope:* Customs union (incomplete common market).
- Full Members: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay.
(Free Trade Area of the Americas)
Proposed FTA for the Americas (never implemented).
ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations)
Members:** Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, Brunei.
Currency conversion
1 euro = $1.07
1 pound = $1.25
Currency Speculation
Short-term movement of funds from 1 currency to another in hopes of profiting from shifts in exchange rates
Carry Trade
Borrowing in one currency where interest rates are low and then using the proceeds to invest in another currency where interest rates are high
Borrowing yen then converting it to dollars and depositing in a US bank
Based on the belief that there will be no adverse movement in exchange/interest rates
Spot Exchange
2 parties agree to exchange currencies and execute the deal immediately
Spot Exchange Rate
A foreign exchange dealer converts one currency into another on a particular dayat the current market rate.
Forward exchange
2 parties agree to exchange currency and execute the deal at some specific future date
Arbitrage
Buying a currency low and selling it high
Capital Flight
Resident and non-residents rush to convert their holdings of domestic currency into a foreign currency
Likely to occur when the value of domestic currency is depreciating rapidly because of hyperinflation or a country’s economic prospects are shaky
Location Economies
Economies that arise from performing a value creation activity in the optimal location for that activity
It can lower the costs of value creation and help the firm to achieve a low-cost position and/or help firm differentiate its product from competitors
Learning Effects
Cost savings that come from learning by doing
Ex. Labor learns by repetitions on how to carry out a ask
Economies of Scale
Reductions in unit cost achieved by producing a large number of a product
Lowers a firm’s unit costs and increases profitability
4 basic in’l strategies
Global Standardization
Localization Strategy
International Strategy
Transnational Strategy
Global Standardization Strategy
Increasing profitability and profit growth by reaping the costs reductions that come from economies of scale, learning effects, and location economies
Pursue a low-cost strategy on a global scale
Try not to customize their product and marketing strategy
Market a standardized product worldwide
Localization Strategy
Customizing the firm’s goods and services to provide a good match to tastes and preferences in different national/regional markets
Good when there's a substantial difference between across nations
Downside is that customization limits the ability to have cost reductions associated with mass production
International Strategy
Taking products first produced for their domestic market and selling them internationally with only minimal local customization
Selling a product that serves universal needs , but don’t have many competitors
Unlike global standardization they don’t have the pressure to reduce their cost structure
Transnational Strategy
Simultaneously achieve low costs through economies of scale, learning effects, and location economies while differentiate their product offering across geographic markets
Foster a multidirectional flow of skills between subsidiaries on the firms global network of operations
Not easy to pursue because of conflicting demands placed on company
Strategic Alliance
cooperative agreements between potential or actual competitors
Advantages of Strategic Alliances
Facilitate entry into a foreign market
Allow firms to share the fixed costs and associated risks of developing new products or processes
Bring together complementary skills and assets neither company could easily develop on its own
Help firm establish technological standards for the industry that will benefit the firm
Disadvantages of Strategic Alliances
Give competitors a low-cost route to new technology and markets
⅔ of alliances run into serious managerial and financial problems within 2 years of their formation; 33% percent of those ultimately rates failures to the parties involved
Pioneering Costs
Costs that an early entrant has to bear that a later entrant can avoid.
Arise when business system in a foreign country is so different than the firm’s home market that the enterprise has to devote effort, time, and expense to learning the rules of the game
6 entry mode types
Exporting
Turnkey Projects
Licensing
Franchising
Joint Ventures
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries
Exporting Advantages
Avoids substantial costs of establishing manufacturing operations in host country
Help achieve experience curve and location economies
Exporting Disadvantages
Only good for firms pursuing global or transnational strategies
High transportation costs particularly for bulk products
Could get around by manufacturing bulk products regionally
Tariff barriers can make exporting uneconomical
A local marketing agent might not do as great as a job as the firm’s own marketing team
Can set up wholly owned subsidiaries in foreign markets to handle local marketing, sales, and service
Turnkey Projects
Contractor agrees to handle every detail of the project for a foreign client
At end of contract, client is handed key to plant that is ready for all operation
Turnkey Project Advantages
When foreign direct investment is limited by host-government regulations
Turnkey Project Disadvantages
Firm that enters into deal will have no long-term interest in deal
May inadvertently create competitors
Sells the competitive advantage to potential and/or actual competitors
Licensing
Arrangement where licensor grants the rights to intangible property to another entity (the licensee) for a specific period, in return the licensor receives a royalty fee from licensee
Licensing Advantages
Firm does not have to bear the development costs and risks associated with opening a foreign market
A firm doesn’t have to commit substantial financial resources to an unfamiliar or political volatile foreign market
Great for firms lacking the capital to develop operations overseas
Could be used when firm wish to participate in foreign market but is prohibited from doing so by barrier to investment
Great when firm possesses some intangible property that has business applications but doesn’t want to develop those applications itself
Licensing Disadvantages
Doesn’t give form tight control over manufacturing, marketing, and strategy that is required for realizing experience curve and location economies
Limits firm ability to take advantage of being multinational and use its profits to support a different licensee operating in different country
Lose control of its technology
Franchasing
A specialized form of licensing in which the franchiser not only sells intangible property to the franchisee but also insists that the franchisee agree to abide by strict rules as to how it does business
Franchising Advantages
Relieved of costs and risks of opening a foreign market
Similar to licensing
Franchising Disadvantages
May inhibit the firm’s ability to take profits out of one country to support competitive attacks in another country
Quality control
Joint Ventures
Establishing a firm that is jointly owned by 2 or more otherwise independent firms
Joint Ventures Advantages
Form benefits from a local partner’s knowledge of host;s country’s competitive conditions, cultures, language, political systems, and business
Sharing entry cost/risks with the partner
Low risk of being subject to nationalization or other forms of adverse government interference
Joint Ventures disadvantages
Risks giving control of its technology to its partner
Doesn’t give a form the tight control over subsidiaries that it might need to realize experience curve or location economics
Nor does it give a firm the tight control over a foreign subsidiary that it might need for engaging in coordinated global attacks against its rivals
Shared ownership arrangements can lead to conflicts and battles for control between the investing firms if their goals and objectives change or if they take different views as to what the strategy should be
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries
The firm owns 100% of the stock
Can either set up a new operation in that country referred to as greenfield venture or ot can acquire established firm
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Pros
When competitive advantage is based on tech competence, a wholly owned subsidiary reduces the risk of losing control over that competence
Gives firm tight control over operations in different counties, which is necessary for engaging in global strategic coordination
Needed to realize location and experience curve economies, when cost pressures are intense it may pay a firm to configure its value chain such a way that the value added a t each stage is maximized
Owns all profits generated in a foreign market
Wholly Owned Subsidiaries cons
Most costly method
Firms bear fill capital costs and risks of setting up overseas operations
Pros of Acquisitions
Quick to execute
Preempt their competitors
Less risky
Why do acquisitions fail
Acquiring firms often overpay for the assets of the acquired
Too optimistic about the value that can be created via acquiring firm and thus willing pay a significant premium over a target firm’s market capitalization
Hubris Hypothesis = top management typically overestimate their ability to create value since rising to the top of a corporation has given them an exaggerated sense of their own capabilities
Clash between the cultures of the acquiring and acquired films (chrysler vs german)
Failed attempts to realize gain by integrating operations often run into roadblocks and take much longer than expected
Inadequate pre acquisition screening
Don’t thoroughly analyze potential benefits and costs
Greenfield Ventures
Gives firm greater ability to build the kind of subsidiary company that it wants
Much easier to establish a set of operating routines than convert the operating of an acquired unit
Less risky than acquisitions with respect to the less possibility of unpleasant surprises
Acquisitions
Quicker than greenfields ventures to establish
Not as risky as greenfields in respect to the degree of uncertainty associated with future revenue and profit prospects
Greenfield ventures face possibility of being preempted by more aggressive global competitors who enter via acquisitions and build a big market presence that limits the market potential
3 staffing policies
ethnocentric Approach
polycentric approach
Geocentric
Ethnocentric Aproach
One which all key management positions are filled by parent-country nationals
Ethnocentric Polcity Pros
Best way to maintain a unified corporate culture
If firm is trying to create value by transferring core competencies to a foreign operations,
Ethnocentric Polcity cons
Limits advancement opportunities for host-country nationals. Which can lead to resentment, lower productivity, and increased turnover
Can lead to cultural myopia - the firm’s failure to understand host-country differences that require different approaches to marketing and management
Polycentric Approach
Requires host-country nationals to be recruited to manage subsidiaries while paren-nationals occupy key positions at corporate headquarters
Polycentric Pros
Less likely to suffer from cultural myopia
May be less expensive to implement reducing costs of value creation
Polycentric Cons
Host-country nationals have limited opportunities to gain experience outside their own country and this cannot progress beyond senior positions in their own subsidiary
Gap that can form between host-country managers and parent-country managers
Geocentric Approach
Seeks the best people for key jobs throughout the organization, regardless of nationality
Geocentric Approach Pros
Enables the firm to make best use of its human resources
Enables the firm to build a cadre of international executives who feel at home working in a number of cultures
Better able to create value from the pursuit of experience curve and location economic and from multidirectional transfer of core competencies
Geocentric Approach Cons
Expensive to implement; Training and relocation costs
compensation structure with standard international bas pay level higher than national levels in many countries
Many countries have laws require employment of host-country nationals
4 expatriate selection dimensions (Mendenhall/Oddou)
Self - Orientation
Others - Orientation
Perceptual Ability
Cultural ˇToughness
Self - Orientation
Strengthen the expatriate’s self esteem, self-confidence, and mental well-being
Expatriate with high self esteem/confidence and mental wellbeing were more likely to to succeed in foreign postings
Others-orientation
Ability to interact effectively with host-country nationals
The more effectively expatriate’s interact with host-country nationals the more likely they are to succeed
Relationship development & Willingness to communicate
Perceptual Ability
This is the ability to understand why people of other countries behave the way they do
Non- judgemental and non-evaluative
Cultural Toughness
Relationship between how well people adjust to particular countries
Some countries are much tougher than others due to unfamiliarity
5 reason US managers fail
Inability of spouse to adjust
Manager’s inability to adjust
Other family problems
Manager’s personal/emotional maturity
inability to cope with larger overseas responsibilities
Repatriation
Preparing expatriate managers for reentry into their home countries and organization
People usually come back after being celebrated and well compensated for being unknown and not needed anymore. Or give them busy job that don’t really use their expatriate skills
Need good HR planning
Foreign Service Premium
Extra pay the expatriate receives for working outside their home country
16% average premium
Tim Hortons in China: Overcoming Entry Barriers
1. Differentiation – Highlight Canadian roots (hockey, doughnuts) to stand out.
2. Pricing – Position between Starbucks (premium) and Luckin (budget).
3. Localization – Add espresso-based drinks and tea options to suit Chinese tastes.
4. Expansion – Focus on Tier 1 cities first (Shanghai, Beijing), then expand.
5. Digital & Delivery – Partner with Meituan/Ele.me for online orders.
6. Marketing – Use hockey-themed promotions and influencer collaborations.
Xiamen Airlines: Recruiting Foreign Pilots**
1. Competitive Pay – Match global salaries ($200K+) and offer bonuses.
2. Career Growth – Provide advanced training and titles (e.g., "Honoured Captain").
3. Work-Life Balance – Flexible schedules (commuting vs. full-time options).
4. Support – Housing, relocation help, and language/cultural training.
5. Retention – Long-term contracts with increasing benefits.