1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Reluctant conclusion
When a speaker appears to reach a conclusion unwillingly
Enthymeme
A rhetorical syllogism that leaves out a premise because it’s assumed the audience already agrees with it.
Controversia
A Roman rhetorical exercise involving debate over a hypothetical legal or moral case to practice argumentation.
Peritrope
A rhetorical turn where an opponent’s argument is used against them
Ethos
The appeal to a speaker’s credibility
Logos
The use of logic
Pathos
The appeal to emotion in order to move or persuade an audience.
Decorum
The art of matching tone
Phronesis
Practical wisdom or good judgment; an appeal to the audience’s sense of reason and experience.
Dubitatio
A rhetorical technique where the speaker pretends to be uncertain or modest to gain the audience’s trust.
Protagoras
A Sophist who claimed “man is the measure of all things
Socrates
A Greek philosopher known for questioning assumptions through dialogue and exposing contradictions in others’ beliefs.
Carneades
A skeptical philosopher who argued that truth is uncertain and that arguments should be judged by probability.
Antonius
In Cicero’s De Oratore
Crassus
Also from De Oratore
List summaries
Condensed reviews that organize main ideas or terms into a clear
Syllogism
A logical structure with two premises leading to a conclusion
Deductive reasoning
Logical thinking that moves from general principles to specific conclusions.
Inductive reasoning
Reasoning that moves from specific examples to broader generalizations or theories.
Satirical summaries
Summaries that exaggerate or mock the original text’s style or ideas to highlight its flaws or tone.
Aidos
A Greek concept of shame
Apraxia
the charge that skepticism leads to a state of total inaction, making it impossible to live a coherent life
Ataraxia
A state of calmness or peace of mind achieved by suspending judgment and avoiding disturbance.
Two-logoi fragment
A Sophist idea suggesting every argument has two opposing sides
Human-measure fragment
From Protagoras: “Man is the measure of all things
Cicero
A Roman orator and philosopher who emphasized rhetoric as a tool for civic engagement and moral responsibility.
Marie Hochmuth
A 20th-century rhetorical scholar who analyzed how speeches reveal human motives and social context.
Lucy Stone
A 19th-century abolitionist and women’s rights advocate known for her skillful public speaking and debate.
Backfire effect
When attempts to correct someone’s beliefs actually strengthen their original misconceptions.
Cognitive debiasing
Strategies used to reduce errors in thinking and decision-making caused by biases.
Metacognition
The awareness of one’s own thought processes; thinking about how you think and learn.
Burden of proof
The obligation to provide evidence or justification for one’s claims in an argument.
Presumption
The default belief or accepted position that must be overturned by sufficient evidence or reasoning.
Argument field
The context or domain in which an argument operates
Sophists
Ancient teachers of rhetoric who taught persuasive speaking and argued that truth can be relative.
Isocrates
A Greek rhetorician who emphasized moral education and practical wisdom through eloquent speech.
Aristotle’s three forms of persuasion (Heinrichs)
The classical framework of ethos (credibility)
Historical development of antilogic and controversia (Mendelson)
The evolution of rhetorical practices that emphasize debating both sides of an issue; antilogic originated with the Sophists’ belief that every argument has a counterargument
“Tense switching” strategy for reframing arguments (Heinrichs)
A rhetorical technique that shifts arguments between past (blame)
The ‘They say / I say’ template approach to argumentation (Graff & Birkenstein)
A writing model that structures academic arguments around responding to others’ ideas—summarizing what “they say” and then presenting what “I say”—to promote clarity