1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Monroe Doctrine
Three elements, noncolonization, abstain from European politics, threaten European involvement in the Americas
Roosevelt Corollary
Big stick diplomacy, markets come first, then democracy, responding to rising European threats like Germany, expanded scope of Monroe, sovereignty in hemisphere creating issues, US needs to intervene to serve as an aggressive democratizer
Truman Doctrine
Argued that the world was a dangerous place therefore we must prevent Soviet expansion anywhere and everywhere, we must redefine American strategy to become involved in nation building
Massive Retaliation/Eisenhower Doctrine
Respond to any Soviet moves with nukes, use nukes in conventional warfare, use as deterrents (credibility), approved clandestine ops through CIA, military advisors as trip wires, lower costs to continue containment, problem is that it promoted pre-emptive strikes and was inherently non credible
Flexible Response/Kennedy Doctrine
Reserve the use of nukes only when truly necessary, respond with equal amounts of force, invest in defense so we can fight two and a half wars, restraint is more credible/threatening
Nixon Doctrine
Recommit to treaties such as NATO, provide nuclear shield to allies, require permission of host state before sending troops, move away from unilateralism
Reagan Doctrine
USSR was responsible for American decline, return of Manifest Destiny (tying it to battle of good and evil), revitalize military strength to rollback Soviet gains through global competition
Shultz Doctrine
Fears of entanglement were overblown, we shouldn’t fear another Vietnam, force is the greatest source of credibility, power and diplomacy tied together, arguing that Weinberger was wrong as the US had many interests (which were vital?) and public opinion shouldnt be a constraint
Weinberger/Powell Doctrine
Use of force should be limited to vital interests (credibility best communicated with restraint), US should only use force when they are prepared to do everything necessary for a quick victory, US forces should have clear objectives and an exit strategy, high importance of public support
Clinton Doctrine
Expand global markets, promote peace, defend humanitarian interests, going back to Triumphant Democracy, no real foreign policy plan followed due to fall of Soviet Union
Bush Doctrine
Focused on pre-emptive strikes on opponents which was an aggressive preventive strategy, unilateralist strategies ignoring international organizations, end world tyranny through nation building to impose democracy from the outside
Trump Doctrine
Withdraw from institutions that tie American power down and are expensive, use bilateral relationships to coerce multinational state groups, strengthen nuclear capabilities, isolate and protect through walls and Golden Dome