1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what approach explains phobias
behavioural approach - explaining behaviour in terms of what is observable and in terms of learning
what is used to explain it
the two process model
proposed by mowrer 1960
states phobias are aquired by classical conditioning and are maintained by operant conditioning
aquisition by classical conditioning
involved learning to associate something we initially have no fear of (NS) with something that already triggers a fear response (UCS)
example
watson & rayner created a phobia in a 9 month baby called ‘little albert’
three stages
before the experiment
during the experiment
after conditioning
before experiment
NS - a white rat that albert was not scared of
UCS - a loud noise which albert naturally got scared by
(the unconditioned response UCR which is fear)
during the experiment
the rat (NS) was paired with the loud noise (UCS) which happened several times
after conditioning
CS - the white rat (gone from neutral to conditioned)
CR - albert became scared when he saw the rat even without the loud noise
he also got scared of other white fluffy things like a rabbit or fur coat
maintenance by operant conditioning
mowrer explained that phobias are often long lasting due to operant conditioning, as most responses acquired by classical conditioning usually tend to decline over time
how does it work
occurs when our behaviour is reinforced or punished, where reinforcement tends to increase the frequency of a behaviour (true in both cases of negative & positive reinforcement)
eg negative reinforcement - an individual avoids a situation that is unpleasant which results in a desirable consequence meaning the behaviour will be repeated
this reduction in fear reinforced the avoidance behaviour and so the phobia is maintained
evaluation
real world application
phobias and traumatic experiences (& counterpoint)
cognitive aspects
evolution
real world application
two process model has practical applications in treating phobias
exposure therapy (eg systematic desensitisation) is based on the idea that avoiding a phobic stimulus maintains fear, while exposure reduces it - avoidance is reinforced by anxiety reduction but exposure prevents this reinforcement and leads to the extinction of fear
supports the model by showing it provides an effective treatment
phobias and traumatic experiences
evidence supports a link between traumatic experiences and phobias
eg little albert, another study found 73% of dental phobia sufferers had experienced a traumatic event related to dentistry, compared to only 21% in a control group with low anxiety - suggests phobias can develop due to traumatic events, aligning with behavioural explanations of classical conditioning
strengthens model by providing real world evidence of conditioned fear responses
counterpoint
not all phobias result from trauma
some phobias eg snake phobias occur even in people who have never had a traumatic encounter with snakes - if phobias were solely due to traumatic experiences, we would expect them only to arise following negative events. the fact some develop without trauma suggests other factors are involved
weakens behavioural explanation and indicates the need for alternative theories such as evolutionary explanations
evolution
evolutionary factors may play a role in phobias
seligman proposed the concept of preparedness, the idea that humans are predisposed to fear certain stimuli (eg snakes, the dark) due to evolutionary survival advantages - suggests some phobias may be biologically hardwired rather than purely learned
challenges model by introducing an evolutionary perspective on why some phobias are more common than others