Theft

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/15

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

16 Terms

1
New cards

Where is theft defined?

S1 Theft Act 1968

2
New cards

What is the definition of theft

“dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive.”

3
New cards

How many stages are there for this offence?

5

4
New cards

What is the first stage? (S3 TA 1968)

AR : There must be an appropriation - “any assumption of the rights of an owner” 

5
New cards

What is a case for the appropriation aspect of the actus reus?

Morris

6
New cards

What is the second stage? (S4 TA 1968)

AR : The item appropriated must be property - “money and all other property, real or personal things in action and other intangible property”.

  • Information isn’t property (Oxford v Moss) and corpses aren’t property (Kelly).

7
New cards

What is the third stage? (S5 TA 1968)

AR: The appropriated property must belong to another - property

belongs to any person with “possession or control or any proprietary interest in it.”

  • Abandoned property does not have an owner (Basildon).

8
New cards

What is the fourth stage? (S2 TA 1968)

MR : Dishonesty - Under the Ivey v Genting test, a person is dishonest if they were dishonest according to the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people (objective test).

  • This replaces the old Ghosh test and is fairer.

9
New cards

What is the fifth stage? (S6 TA 1968)

MR: Intention to permanently deprive - D must intend to permanently deprive the victim of their property (DPP v J; DPP v Lavender).

  • Borrowing doesn’t count (R v Lloyd), but if money is borrowed, the exact same notes must be returned (R v Velumyl).

10
New cards

What are cases for appropriation?

  • Morris - switching labels is appropriation 

  • Gomez - still appropriation if consent was obtained via deception

  • Hinks - even accepting a gift can count as theft is done dishonestly

11
New cards

Can theft be proven if any of the elements are missing?

No

12
New cards

What is a case for property?

  • Oxford v Moss - confidential information isn’t property

13
New cards

What is a case for “belonging to another”?

  • Turner - stealing your own car from a garage can be theft 

  • Woodman - something can belong to someone even if they don’t know that it’s there 

  • Bennett - using flatmates money for bills on something else can be theft 

14
New cards

What is a case for dishonesty?

  • Ghosh - old test (subjective and objective)

  • Ivey v Genting - purely objective test : Would the defendant’s conduct be dishonest by the standards of ordinary decent people?

15
New cards

What are cases for “intention to permanently deprive”.

  • Velumyi - borrowing money and not returning the same notes is theft

  • Lloyd - borrowing a film and not returning it in the same condition is NOT theft

  • Lavender - stealing doors from council is theft

16
New cards

What stops something from counting as dishonesty?

  • you believe you have a right to the property 

  • you believe the owner would consent to

  • you believe the owner can’t be found with reasonable steps