1/36
first 11 are leftover from L13
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
synonymous vs nonsynonymous dn/ds
one strategy to determine if a locus is evolving by drift or by
dn = # of nonsynonymous change (difference)/ nonsynonymous site
ds = # of synonymous change (difference)/ synonymous site
dn/ds < 1
fewer non than syn mutations = purifying selection
dn/ds = 1
equal non and syn mutations = neutral evolution
dn/ds > 1
more non than syn mutation = positive selection
dn/ds is a conservative
it often has a value less than 1 even when positive selection has occurred
this is because the signal from positive selection can sometimes be swamped by historic purifying selection
Synonymous mutations
DNA changes that don't alter the amino acid sequence of a protein
Nonsynonymous mutations
change the protein sequences and are frequently subjected to natural selection
The McDonald-Kreitman test (MK test)
compares the ds/pi to dn/pi
d = number of difference between species
pi = heterozygosity (polymorphism)
if the ratio for non is higher
positive selection
if the ratio for the syn is higher
purifying selection
ratio is equal
neutral
gene flow
mixing of alleles in different populations
can introduce new alleles into one population from another population
gene flow is random
with respect to fitness
gene flow can increase
genetic variation within a population
gene flow tend to
decrease genetic variation between populations
homogenize allele frequencies
dispersal
the movement of individuals and/or gametes
passive dispersal
dispersal of pollen or seeds by wind
dispersal of planktonic larvae by currents
active dispersal
humans dispersing from Africa
herd migration across plains
benefits of dispersal
find better habitat (new/plentiful resources)
better habitat for offspring
less competition
find new mates (reduce inbreeding)
cost of dispersal
new habitat can be dangerous
new habitat can be unpredictable
energetic trade-off (moving long distances is energetically costly)
migration does NOT contribute to gene flow if it
doesn’t lead to mixing of alleles between populations
migrants move to a new population and reproduce in their new home
gene flow
migrants move to a new population and return to where they were born to reproduce (no mixing of alleles)
NOT gene flow
how is gene flow measured
to determine how to measure gene flow, we need to determine the nature of the environment
DeltaP = m(pm - p)
migration rate (m)
the fraction of individuals in a population that arrives from another population in each generation
p’ = p + dP
spatially continuous
there are no distinct populations so migration rate cannot be used
gene flow is measured by migration variance
migration variance Om2
variance in the distribution of where individuals were born vs where they reproduce
square root of migration variance Om
equal to the average distance between birthplaces of parent and offspring
genetic divergence between populations - measured by Fst
which measures the genetic variance found across populations that results from genetic differences between them