Duress of Circumstance and Necessity

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/13

flashcard set

Earn XP

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

14 Terms

1
New cards

Duress by Circumstance

External factor of the circumstances dictates the crime

2
New cards

Elements of defence

1. There must be a peril of death or serious injury

2. Whether the defendant acted reasonably will be judged objectively (Apply Graham 2-part test)

3. There was no avenue of escape the defendant could have taken

4. Threat need not be immediate but it must be imminent.

5. The defendant cannot use the defence it they have voluntarily laid themselves open to the duress.

3
New cards

Graham 2-part Test

(a)Was the defendant compelled to act because they reasonably feared serious injury or death? (subjective and objective test)

(b)Would a sober person of reasonable firmness have responded in the same way? (objective test)

4
New cards

Complete or Incomplete?

Complete defence, except for murder.

5
New cards

Willer 1986

Driving under compulsion is a form of duress.

6
New cards

Conway 1988

If external circumstances relate to the passenger, then defence is not available. D need to be acting in order to avoid threat of death of serious injury.

7
New cards

Martin 1989

Duress of circumstance applied to wife threatening suicide - peril related to the wife but D was clearly acting in order to avoid threat of death of serious injury.

8
New cards

Pommell 1995

Confirmed duress of circumstance available for all offences except murder and attempted murder.

9
New cards

Cairns 1999

Perceived threat is enough – so 2-part Graham test can be applied. 

10
New cards

Abdul-Hussain 1999

External threat need not be immediate, but it had to be imminent.

11
New cards

Duress of Necessity

1. The act must be done only to prevent an act of greater evil.

2. The evil must be directed towards the defendant or a person or persons for whom they are responsible

3. The act must be reasonable and proportionate to the evil avoided.

12
New cards

R v Dudley and Stephens Principle

There must be circumstances which force a person to act in order to prevent a worse evil from occurring.

13
New cards

Jodie and Mary 2000

The judge said the situation was one of necessity and the doctors in this case could operate, killing the weaker Mary and saving Jodie.

14
New cards

Why is Jodie and Mary 2000 so important?

This means that necessity could be a defence, even to a potential charge of murder.