Chapter 5: The Scholar vs. the Statesman: Thomas Hobbes and Edward Coke

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/26

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

27 Terms

1
New cards

Edward Coke and Hobbes's vendetta

The conflict between traditional legal thought and Hobbes's radical ideas.

2
New cards

Henry de Bracton

Medieval jurist whose work was cited by Coke to support established legal norms.

3
New cards

common law case, 1607: Prohibitions del Roy

A landmark case illustrating tensions between royal power and legal tradition.

4
New cards

Francis Bacon

Statesman and philosopher whose career intersected with these legal controversies.

5
New cards

Petition of Right, 1628

A constitutional document asserting limits on monarchical power.

6
New cards

Dr. Bonham's Case

An early example of judicial review challenging absolute royal authority.

7
New cards

Gunpowder Plot and Guy Fawkes

A historical event underscoring the dangers of political dissent.

8
New cards

Chief Judge of the Court of Common Pleas, 1606

The legal position held by Coke, symbolizing the strength of common law.

9
New cards

Thomas Hobbes

The political philosopher advocating absolute sovereignty to prevent societal collapse.

10
New cards

natural equality of humans, male and female

Hobbes's idea that in the state of nature, all individuals are equally vulnerable.

11
New cards

state of nature

Hobbes's concept of a pre-political condition marked by perpetual conflict.

12
New cards

reason serves the passions

The notion that human rationality is ultimately driven by underlying desires.

13
New cards

law is the command of the sovereign

Hobbes's principle that legal authority comes solely from the ruler.

14
New cards

master-less men

Individuals in the state of nature lacking protection from a central authority.

15
New cards

right of self-preservation

The fundamental drive to survive, justifying submission to authority.

16
New cards

emphasis on consent as the basis of government

The idea that legitimate rule arises only through the agreement of the governed.

17
New cards

theory of natural right

The concept that individuals have inherent rights independent of government (a notion Hobbes disputed).

18
New cards

what actually limits the power of the sovereign

The question contrasting Hobbes's view with those who seek checks on absolute power.

19
New cards

no "higher law"

Hobbes's rejection of any legal or moral principle above the sovereign's command.

20
New cards

no inalienable rights except that of self-preservation

The assertion that only the right to life is inherent.

21
New cards

the mischief of continental learning and Roman ideas about liberty

Hobbes's critique of imported political philosophies.

22
New cards

rejection of common law concepts of the custom of the realm and precedent

Hobbes's dismissal of established legal traditions.

23
New cards

Coke's and Hobbes's different concepts of reason

The divergence between Coke's reliance on judicial precedent and Hobbes's rationalistic approach.

24
New cards

Machiavelli's and Hobbes's attitudes toward Christians

Their differing views on the role of religious ethics in politics.

25
New cards

rationalization of the revolution of Henry VIII

Hobbes's analysis of the upheavals during the English Reformation.

26
New cards

Peter Laslett: why Hobbes's ideas were not implemented in England

An observation on the practical limits of Hobbes's theories.

27
New cards

William Blackstone on the common law

Blackstone's defense of the enduring nature of common law traditions.