All (20597)
Notes (10000)
note
Cognitive Dissonance theory
Updated 674d ago
0.0(0)
note
Cognitive Dissonance Theory Notes
Updated 393d ago
0.0(0)
note
Cognitive Dissonance
Updated 84d ago
0.0(0)
note
Cognitive Dissonance Study Notes
Updated 220d ago
0.0(0)
Flashcards (10000)
flashcards
Existential security theory
12
Updated 10m ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Social Identity Theory
6
Updated 2h ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
theories
51
Updated 3h ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Bowlby Attatchment Theory
16
Updated 8h ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Harlow Attatchment Theory
16
Updated 8h ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Philosophy learning course Episode one •the three main branches of philosophy -Metaphysics -Epistemology -Value theory -the origins of philosophy mostly came from Ancient Greece. -How to understand and evaluate world views -logic Episode two -Aristotle once said that humans are the rational animal -rationality sets us humans apart from other species, it is our distinguishing characteristic! •Arguments and strong reasoning will not only make you a better philosopher, but it’ll also make you a more persuasive person. •Tripartite soul: A theory from Plato -Rational|Logical - seeks truth and is swayed by facts and arguments -Spirited|Emotional - how feelings fuel your actions -Appetitive|Physical Desires - drives you to eat, have sex, and protect yourself -side note, philosophers, like me.. heh, love thinking about questions, especially ones that don’t quite yet have answers! -use philosophical “wind sprints” as exercises in a way! •Argument structures -Premises help structure your argument, they’re used as a proposition to justify a conclusion. In deductive arguments, it says that if your premises are true, then your conclusion MUST be true! -ex. : premise 1 - all humans are mortal. premise 2 - Socrates is a human. conclusion - Socrates is mortal. -Entailments are when two things or more are taken together to entail an answer. -ex. : premise 1 -> premise 2 -> conclusion/answer The truth of the premises MUST lead to the conclusion! -Validity is when an argument is well, valid, if the truth of the premises guarantees (entails) the truth of the conclusion. -ex. : premise 1 -> premise 2 -> conclusion/answer says that Socrates was Plato’s teacher The conclusion/answer is wrong because the previous premises do not entail that conclusion whatsoever, invalid! -Validity is NOT the same as truth. -Deductive soundness: Validity+All true premises -An argument CAN be valid, but not logically correct
10
Updated 8h ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Developmental Theories
152
Updated 12h ago
0.0(0)
Users (597)