Lecture 11 / Attitudes & Behavior

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

Last updated 9:24 AM on 5/23/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

20 Terms

1
New cards

Behavior Shaping Attitudes

Behavior can also form/change attitudes (e.g., adapting to a new job positions and career choices).

2
New cards

LaPiere's Study (1930s)

Surveyed American hotels, restaurants, and clubs about allowing Chinese people to enter, and all responded negatively. However, when he visited these establishments with a Chinese couple, they were welcomed without issue, highlighting the difference between stated attitudes and actual behavior.

3
New cards

Behavior-Attitude Associations

Our movements can influence whether we accept a message or refuse it (e.g., leaning forward while reading increases the chance of acceptance).

4
New cards

Self-Perception Theory (Bem, 1965)

Says that when internal cues are weak or ambiguous, people infer their own attitudes and emotions by observing their freely and actively chosen behavior and the context around it. This is the basis for foot-in-the-door methods, but only works for attitudes that are not important to us and we have no prior knowledge about them.

5
New cards

Cognitive Dissonance Theory (Festinger, 1957)

Individuals experience an unpleasant state of mental discomfort (dissonance) when holding conflicting beliefs, or when they are aware of an inconsistency between important attitudes and their actions. This discomfort motivates people to reduce the inconsistency by changing their behavior, justifying their actions, or ignoring conflicting information to restore internal consistency.

6
New cards

Preconditions for Cognitive Dissonance

  1. Perceiving the action as internally inconsistent. 2. Perceiving the action as freely chosen, rather than forced by external factors. 3. Experiencing uncomfortable physiological arousal (discomfort or guilt). 4. Attributing that uncomfortable arousal directly to the inconsistency between your attitude and action.
7
New cards

Insufficient Justification Effect

When offered a small reward or weak incentive to perform a behavior that contradicts their beliefs, individuals internally justify that behavior by adopting a positive attitude toward it.

8
New cards

Effort Justification Effect

People place a higher value on outcomes that require significant effort, time, or sacrifice to achieve. This helps individuals justify their actions, ensuring that labor feels worthwhile even if the results are mediocre.

9
New cards

Justifying Decisions

Making a choice means accepting the disadvantages of the chosen option and sacrificing the benefits of the non-chosen alternative.

10
New cards

Post-Decisional Regret Effect

The negative emotion and self-blame experienced after making a choice that leads to a poor outcome or when realizing an alternative option was superior.

11
New cards

Minimizing the Inconsistencies

Trivializing the behavior or adding cognitions to make it consonant (e.g., calling a large cake a "reward" for a week of dieting).

12
New cards

Minimizing Perception of Free Choice

Using external attribution and saying that someone forced the behavior.

13
New cards

Attributing the Arousal to Something Else

Suppressing the discomfort, such as using drugs or alcohol to numb feelings.

14
New cards

Reaffirming Self-Worth Integrity

Focusing on integrity to reduce dissonance (e.g., saying "I'm a good doctor").

15
New cards

Changing Future Behavior (The Hypocrisy Effect)

A psychological phenomenon where individuals feel compelled to change their behavior to match their stated beliefs, typically induced after they publicly advocate for a behavior they have failed to practice.

16
New cards

Dissonance and Culture

People from individualistic cultures tend to experience cognitive dissonance more frequently, and in collectivist cultures, there is a high level of tolerance for dissonance.

17
New cards

The Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA, Fishbein & Ajzen, 1967/1980)

Posits that a person's behavior is determined by their intention to perform it, which is driven by their attitude toward the behavior and subjective norms. It suggests people consider consequences before acting, focusing on voluntary behaviors.

18
New cards

Attitude Accessibility

The influence of an attitude is affected by self-monitoring, self-awareness, and attitude strength (how frequently activated, well-established, and self-relevant it is). It can also be oppressed by other aspects, like social norms or habits.

19
New cards

Attitude Correspondence

The target and behavior need to be exactly the same, requiring an appropriate level of specificity and object-behavior target correspondence.

20
New cards

Belief in Personal Control (Theory of Planned Behavior, Ajzen, 1991)

Emphasizes that a person needs the ability and opportunity to act; for example, loving Ferraris won't influence purchasing behavior if you cannot actually afford one