1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Temptation
The urge or desire to do something that you know is wrong or unwise
Social control theories
All people are tempted to commit crime but not everyone does
Not concerned with answering “why do some people commit crime?”
More concerned with answering "Why do most people not offend?”
Why do people conform?
What keeps us under control?
How are some people able to resist criminal temptations and others are not?
Containment theory - Walter Reckless
Everyone experiences pushes and pulls
Ex: frustration, anger, resentment, isolation, alienation, low self esteem
Ex: peer pressure, poverty, media glorification, wanting more money/status, excitement
People can be “insulated”(protected) from succumbing to criminal pushes and pulls
#1 Inner containment: internal elements within the individual that prevent criminal behavior, ex: personal upbringing and morals,
If people have a strong sense of self/self-worthiness (believe that you are a good person) you are less likely to give into those temptations
Pushes
Internal pressures that can lead to deviant or criminal behavior
Pulls
External pressures that can lead to deviant or criminal behavior
Inner containment
internal elements within the individual that prevent criminal behavior, ex: personal upbringing and morals,
If people have a strong sense of self/self-worthiness (believe that you are a good person) you are less likely to give into those temptations
Outer containment
elements outside of the individual that present criminal behaviour
Ex: formal or informal social control, getting arrested, getting charged, convictions, security cameras
Informal- being judged, isolation, exclusion, eye rolling, pointing, people talking about you, dirty looks
is inner or outer containment more important?
Inner because it is internal, your conscious so its always present
why do people commit crimes then (related to inner and outer containment btw)
because their internal containment is weak
Travis Hirschi - social bond theory
Deviance is natural, so why do people conform? What prevents people from violating norms?
The answer is social bonds, they serve as social control by imposing restraints on our behaviour
Why do people commit crime then?
When their social bonds are weakened or broken
had 4 bonds
bond #1
Attachment
-emotional connections to others
-more emotional connected to other we’re less likely to commit crime
-identification with parents and peers, concerns about their opinions/judgements on what you do
bond #2
Commitment
-level of dedication (time, energy, effort, etc) to conventional activities or goals
-greater investment to achieve conventional goals, you’re less likely to commit criminal acts as you lose what you have worked for (cheating on a test means being on academic probation)
bond #3
Involvement
Participation in conventional activities
When we are keeping busy in conventional activities this is going to strength the social bond
Increase conformity to laws and not engage in delinquency/criminal activity because you have less time to do anything else, crime
bond #4
Acceptance of social norms, rules and laws
Acknowledge that societies rules are fair and that's why you follow them, respect for authority
Moral obligation to follow them, if yes thats a social bond
If not then it can get you into trouble
How does social bond theory differ from strain theory
strain theory is the assumption that everyone has the same goals and when you can’t meet those goals you achieve them thru other means
The general theory of crime/self-control theory - Micheal Gottfredson and Travis Hirschi
Why do people not commit crime?
-they have self-control
Self control
The ability to restrain your emotions, desires or impulses particularly in tempting circumstances
-theory prioritizes an individual's internal disposition
-however, crime is the result of both low self-control and the presence of an opportunity to commit a crime
-theory is broad in scope, one cause for all types of crime
7 characteristics of low self-control
Impulsive: acting before thinking
Risk taking; activities that provide adrenaline or excitement
Unable to delay gratification:
Low tolerance for frustration, getting angry when things don’t do your way
Insensitive to others, making jokes that hurt other people’s feelings, cancelling plans last minute, interrupting other people, being late
Avoidance of difficult tasks, procrastinate
Lack of concern for (long-term) consequences; cheating on a test, spending all your money immediately on things you don’t need
When is self-control established?
early in childhood between the ages of 8 -10
-after 10, your level of self-control is the same throughout your life
What determines self-control?
-socialization, we are taught self-control, a skill and is learned though parents
-it’s not just willpower,
-people who have better self-control are better in school, job prospects
What is low self-control the result of?
-result of poor ineffective parenting
-lack of discipline, not doing anything about poor behaviour
-Helicopter parenting
-abusive parenting
-inconsistent parenting, punish sometimes but not others
Why do low self control predispose individuals to crime?
Impulsive- characteristic of crimes, expressive, heat of the moment
Unable to delay gratification, characteristic of crime, provide quick benefits, short term pleasure,
Risk-seeking characteristics of crime; crime is risky,
Insensitive to others , characteristics of crime: crime harms others
Low tolerance for frustration, characteristic of crime: people can commit crime out of frustration
Low tolerance of difficult tasks - characteristic of crime: easier way out, quick, fast, doesn’t require much skill or effort
Lack of concern for long-term consequences: no one commits a crime thinking they’ll get caught
Criticisms
Overemphasis of poor parenting, other factors like peers and genetics play a role
Self control is not established at 8-10, it changes throughout your life
It ignores social structures ignoring structural, systemic factors like poverty and environment
Argue that this theory doesn’t work for white collar crime