1/37
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Begging the question
is a logical fallacy in which an argument's conclusion is assumed in its premises, creating a circular reasoning flaw.
Sweeping generalization
a logical fallacy that involves making broad claims based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence, often ignoring exceptions.
Tu quoque
is a fallacy that redirects criticism back to the accuser rather than addressing the original argument, effectively deflecting rather than engaging in substance; being a hypocrite.
Equivocation
is a logical fallacy that arises when a word or phrase is used ambiguously within an argument, leading to misleading or erroneous conclusions.
Ad hominem
is a fallacy that attacks the character or motive of the individual making an argument rather than addressing the argument itself.
Cherry Picking
is a fallacy that involves selectively presenting evidence that supports a particular stance while ignoring evidence that contradicts it, leading to skewed conclusions.
Invalid deduction
is a fallacy in which an argument fails to follow logically from its premises, rendering the conclusion unreliable.
Strawman
is a fallacy that misrepresents or exaggerates an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack or refute.
Slippery Slope
Assuming that if one thing happens, a series of increasingly bad things will inevitably.
Conflation
Treating two or more different concepts as if they were the same thing.
Casual flaw
Assuming a cause where there is no valid casual connection.
Post hoc
Assuming that because one event followed another, the first caused the second.
Circular Argument
A reasoning error where the conclusion is already assumed in the premises.
Red herring
Introducing an irrelevant topic to distract from the main issue.
False dichotomy
Claiming only two options exist when more actually do.
Bandwagon
Claiming something must be true because everyone believes it or does it.
Confusion of necessary and sufficient conditions
Mixing up what is required for something to happen with what guarantees it.
Non sequitur
Drawing a conclusion that doesn’t logically follow from the evidence provided.
Rash generalization
Making a conclusion based on too little or unrepresentative evidence.
Begging the question
The bible is true because it says so in the Bible.
Sweeping generalization
One bad politician means the entire government is corrupt.
Tu quoque
You say i shouldn´t cheat, but you cheated in college
Equivocation
The sign said “fine for parking here,” so I thought it was okay to park
Ad hominem
Don’t listen to her argument about health eating—she’s overweight.
Cherry picking
Scientists proved coffee is good for you, so forget the studies showing it increases anxiety.
Invalid deduction
All animals are warm-blooded. This animal is warm-blooded, so it must be a mammal.
Strawman
So you think we should have fewer homework assignments? I guess you just want students to learn nothing
Slippery Slope
If we allow cell phones in class, soon kids will stop paying attention altogether and schools will collapse.
Conflation
Justice and revenge are the same thing—they both involve getting what’s deserved
Casual flaw
I failed my test because my pencil broke
Post hoc
The rooster crowed before sunrise, so the rooster caused the sun to rise
Circular argument
The Earth must be round because people all over the world believe it
Red herring
We shouldn’t worry about poverty until we fix the national debt
False dichotomy
You either support this policy, or you hate your country
Bandwagon
Everyone’s buying this brand of sneakers, so it must be the best
Confusion of necessary and sufficient conditions
Getting an A on this test means I'm guaranteed to graduate
Non sequitur
My dog barks at strangers, so he must be a good judge of character
Rash generalization
My two friends from that town are rude, so everyone from there must be rude