1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Who came up with this theory of moral reasoning?
Kohlberg (1970-80)
What is moral reasoning?
our ability to think about what is right and wrong and how to make decisions on how to act
What are the 3 levels?
pre conventional
conventional
post conventional
How does this explanation link to crime?
Kohlberg thought that if someone was stuck at low moral reasoning it leads them to make poor decisions and commit crime
Kohlberg’s research
longitudinal study over 12 years
75 boys between 10 and 16
interviewed them with moral dilemmas
Pre conventional level
egocentric
society’s laws and rules aren’t understood
doesn’t think about impact on others
consists of reward and punishment levels
Punishment level
decisions based on whether or not they are likely to be caught
Rewards level
decisions based on whether the person think rewards outweigh the costs
Conventional and post conventional levels
able to consider impact on others
consider ethical principles
Palmer and Hollin (1998) methods
moral reasoning of 210 female non offenders, 122 male non offenders, 126 make offenders
between 13 and 22 years old
assessed with questionnaire with 11 dilemmas
Palmer and Hollin results
male offenders had significantly lower moral reasoning
Stams et al (2006)
meta analysis of 50 studies
data from 2000 offenders and 2000 non
found offenders operate at lower level
AO3 - androcentric
developed by a man with male samples
may not accurately capture how female offenders make moral decisions
AO3 - ethnocentric
developed by Western researchers
someone may commit bribery because their legal system is corrupt
emic research would be better
AO3 - don’t reason the same in real life as we do in dilemmas
scenarios may be unfamiliar to children, like being married
some criminal behaviour is impulsive and means there is no time to think it through