1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
ceteris paribus
all other things remaining equal
positive statement
statement that is objective and can be tested
normative statement
based on opinion can’t be proven
problem of scarcity
people have finite needs but infinite wants, relative concept as scarce due to demands
renewable resource
of economic value that can be replenished on a level to consumption
non renewable resource
of economic value that can’t be readily replaced
opportunity cost
cost of one thing in terms of next best alternative that has been given up
choices best for
consumers
producers
gov
income/ satisfaction
resources/profit
tax.revenue/social welfare
factors of production
land-raw materials, land and produce of sea
labour
capital-man made resources to produce goods
entrepreneurship-willingness and ability to take risks
PPF
maximum possible combinations of capital and consumer goods that the economy can produce with its current resources and technology
specialisation
process of focusing on specific task/product/area to increase efficiency and productivity
division of labour
labour is broken down and specialises in particular part of production process
pros of specialisation/division of labour
labour productivity increases
quality increases as more skilled
more cost effective to develop specialist tools
no time waste
trained to do one task, saves time and money
comparative advantage in trade
cons of specialisation/division of labour
tedious, repetitive so poor quality of work
craftsmanship decreases as more standardised product
not wide training so structural unemployment
overdependent on one export in trade
could run out
high interdependence
free market economy
pros
cons
decisions made by private individuals and firms
pros
efficiency-competition incentivises firms to produce well and innovate
consumer choice- wide range
economic growth-rapid and higher living standards
cons
inequality-income and wealth disparity
lack of public good-essential services under provided without gov.intervention
booms/busts
command economy
pros
cons
made by gov/central authority
pros
equality-reduce income inequality through central planning
stability-central control provides during crisis
prioritizing social goals-resources goes towards public services and social welfare
cons
lack of incentives-central planning discourages innovation
resource misallocation-inefficient leads to shortages
bureaucracy complex
roles of state in mixed economy
regulation-consumer protection, environmental standards=prevent abuse of monopolies
public goods-provides things not adequately supplied by private sector, infrastructure,education,healthcare
welfare and redistribution-gov implements safety nets and income redistribution policies to address poverty and inequality, welfare programs, progressive taxation
stabilisation and economic planning-gov uses fiscal and monetary policies to manage economic cycles, central banks adjust interest rates to control inflation
three way of rational decision making
consumers aim to maximise utility- satisfaction
firms aim to maximise profit
gov aim to maximise social welfare-satisfaction
demand
willingness and ability to buy a good at a given price at a given time
factors that cause shift in demand curve
population- people increase more demand
income- income increase less demand
related goods, complements- price decrease demand increases, substitutes- price increase demand increases
advertising- firm successful demand increases, competitor successful demand decreases
taste- more fashionable more demand
expectations in future- if price increases more demand
seasons- dependent on weather
diminishing marginal utility
demand curve slopes downwards
inverse relationship between price and quantity
we assume people behave rationally and it gives them greatest level of satisfaction
if prices increase, marginal utility per penny for income decrease
total utility
satisfaction gained as result of overall consumption
marginal utility
change in satisfaction by the consumption of the next unit of a good
law of diminishing marginal utility
satisfaction derived from consumption of additional unit of good will decrease as consumption of good increases
price elasticity demand
responsiveness of demand to a change in price of good
factors that affect ped
substitutes- more substitutes more elastic
time- longer time easier for alternation more elastic
necessity- inelastic because even if price increases still need to buy
% of expenditure- if small, increase in price has small impact so inelastic
addicitve- inelastic because even if price increase people will still buy to fulfil addiction
tax elasticity
ineffective at reducing output but higher tax revenue for gov
inelastic consumer burden high but unresponsive to change in price so quantity will not fall
subsidy elasticity
ineffective at increasing output but cheaper for gov to impose
elastic as small change in price and producer revenue high
income elasticity of demand and effect
responsiveness of demand to change in income
impact on type of good firm produces
cross elasticity of demand and effect
responsiveness of demand for one product to the change in price of another product
beware of competition
supply
willingness and ability to provide a good at a price in a given amount of time
factors that affect supply
cost of production- if high but same selling price, loss, less supply shift to left
price of other goods- joint supply production of one good causes extra production of another supply increase, competitive supply production of one good prevents supply of another
weather- particular agricultural goods if good more supply
technology- production falls as more productive efficiency so low price
goals of supplier- wants to help society increase supply but no profit
gov legislation- if rules made supply increase but high levels of regulation means cost increases and supply decreases
tax and subsidies- tax means supply decrease subsidy means supply increase
producer cartels- firms come together so supply decrease so price and profit increase
if supply curve upward sloping
if price increases production increases to take advantage of high profit
if low firms will cut back on unprofitable production so low supply
price elasticity of supply
responsiveness of supply to a change in price of good
factors affecting pes
time- short term so factor of production fixed so inelastic long term factors of production variable can increase production so elastic
stocks- stockpile of goods when price increases so elastic
working below full capacity- if working below when price increases can respond quickly so elastic
availability of factors of production- labour needs skill and training so inelastic
ease of entry into market- expensive startup equipment so supply decrease so inelastic
availability of substitutes- elastic so can alter pattern of production