1/36
Social Psy
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Proximity
physical or functional closeness between people
Role of proximity/propinquity in relationships
The closer people are physically, the more likely they are to interact and form relationships. Due to increased exposures and opportunities to interact.
Propinquity effect
More likely to become friends or partners with those we see often
Mere exposure effect
repeated exposure increases our liking for it. The more we see someone, the more familiar and likable they become (as long as initial reaction wasn’t negative).
What types of similarity predict attraction?
Similarity over complimentary
Opinions
Personalty
Interests
Experience
Appearance
Genetics
Matching hypothesis
People are most likely to form and succeed in relationships with others who are similar in physical attractiveness.
Reciprocal liking
Attracted to people who like us back. Can overcome dissimilarty in attitudes and bias in attractive faces.
Reciprocal liking and relation to attraction
Can overcome dissimilarty in attitudes and bias in attractive faces.
Physical attractiveness on the behavior of others
Attractive people are treated more positively by others.
Halo Effect
A cognitive bias where we assume that someone with one positive trait (like attractiveness) also has other positive traits (like intelligence or kindness).
Characteristics frequently associated with physically attractive people
sociable, friendly, competent, intelligent, successful
Characteristics that are supported by research
Attractive people tend to be more socially skilled and confident, likely due to positive social experiences.
What-is-beautiful must be good
Physical attractiveness equals positive personal qualities
How might the tendency of attractive people to develop better social skills be related to self-fulfilling prophecy?
Because others treat attractive people more positively, they receive more social opportunities and reinforcement. Over time, they develop stronger social skills, which then confirm the initial positive expectations others had — completing a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Composite faces
Created by combining many individual faces. Are rated as more attractive than most individual faces. It is because they are more symmetrical and familiar.
Companionate love
Deep affection, intimacy, and long-term commitment. Found in long-term relationships and friendships.
Passionate love
intense emotional and physical attraction, often early in relationships. Characterized by arousal and longing.
Sternberg’s triangular theory of love
Three components
Intimacy
Passion
Commitment
Intimacy
emotional closeness and connection
Passion
physical attraction and desire
Commitment
decision to maintain the relationship
Secure attachment
comfortable with intimacy and dependence; healthy. stable relationships.
Avoidant attachment
distant, emotionally unavailable; avoids closeness.
Anxious (ambivalent) attachment
fears abandonment, seeks reassurance, may appear clingy.
Reinforcement-affect model
We like people associated with positive emotions or rewarding experiences.
Social exchange theory
What do we get out of the relationship. Seek to maximize benefits and minimize costs.
Investment model (Rusbult)
commitment depends on: satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment
Equity theory
people are happiest in relationships that are fair. When their ratio of inputs (effort, time) to outcomes (love, benefits) is equal to their partners.
Exchange relationships
based on reciprocity and fairness; expect repayment or balance. (New acquaintances)
Communal relationships
focus on responding to the other person’s needs without expecting anything in return. (Long term relationships)
Rewards
Positive, gratifying aspect of relationship
Costs
Negative aspects of relationship
Outcome
Comparison of rewards versus cost.
Comparison level
Expectations
Comparison level for alternatives
Other options
Over benefited
Lots of reward, few costs
Under benefitted
Few rewards and high cost