Exam 2 - Ch 4 Federal & State Courts

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 48

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

49 Terms

1

jurisdiction

legal authority/power of court to hear, pronounce on, + decide a case

New cards
2
  1. personal jurisdiction

authority of court over a person

New cards
3
  1. subject matter jurisdiction

authority conferred on a court to hear a particular type of case

  • ex. traffic court, juvenile court

New cards
4
  1. geographical jurisdiction

authority of courts to hear cases that arise within specific boundaries;

  • city, county, state, country (“venue”)

New cards
5
  1. hierarchal jurisdiction

divison of responsibilites + functions among the various courts

New cards
6

limited jurisdiction

courts that deal w/less serious offenses + civil cases, usually under $1000

  • ex. municipal court

New cards
7

general jurisdiction

court has authority to hear a variety of cases

New cards
8

appellate jurisdiction

authority of a court to review decisions made by lower courts *due process

New cards
9

Article III Courts

est. by Congress pursuant to its authority to create "inferior"/lower courts under Article III of Constitution

  • duties of judicial branch

New cards
10

diversity of citizenship

when opposing parties in a lawsuit are from different states

New cards
11

Federal Court System

3-tiered structure of federal courts; comprising U.S. district courts (94), U.S. courts of appeal (13), and U.S. Supreme Court

New cards
12

How many justices are on the Supreme Court?

9 justices, 1 being the chief

New cards
13

writ or certiorari

orders lower court to send record of a case up to Supreme Court; needs 4/+ votes to be accepted

New cards
14

rule of four

at least 4 justices of the Supreme Court must vote to consider a case before it can be heard

New cards
15

trial de novo

new trial - granted by an appellate court

New cards
16

felony

crime w/imprisonment of at least 1 year

New cards
17

complaint

formal accusation made by officer/citizen of a criminal act

New cards
18

booking

formal process of making a police record of the arrest - name, time of arrest, picture, fingerprints

New cards
19

initial appearance (1st step)

1st court appearance in municipal/justice of peace court

  • informed of rights, nature of charges against them

  • "without unecessary delay

New cards
20

preliminary hearing (2nd step)

initial hearing when judge decides if there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed the crime with which he/she is charged

New cards
21

information

subsitute for indictment, charges are filed directly w/court by prosecutor - bypassing grand jury

New cards
22

indictment

doc formely charging defendent; handed down by grand jury after hearing evidence from prosecutor

New cards
23

arraignment

hearing in which a suspect is charged and pleads guilty or not guilty

New cards
24

plea

defendent's response to the charge against them

New cards
25

standing mute

defendent refuses to plea → court enters plea of not guilty for them

New cards
26

nolo contendere

defendent accepts whatever punishment the court would impose on a guilty def. but refuses to admit liability

New cards
27

Alford plea

defendant claims innocent but pleads guilty for other reasons

New cards
28

challenge for cause

ability to exclude a possible juror if bias or prejudice is indicated

New cards
29

peremptory challenge

removal of a possible juror w/o giving any reason, limited to about 6 or 12, cannot be about race/gender

  • Batson v. Kentucky (1986) - race

  • J.E.B. v. Alabama (1994)- gender

New cards
30

motion

request made to the court

New cards
31

Habeus Corpus

legal protection that prohibits the imprisonment of a person w/o demonstrated cause

  • “you have the body”

New cards
32

3 common judge-selecting methods

  1. appointment

  2. election

  3. merit system (Missouri Plan)

New cards
33

bar associations

groups of lawyers who attempt to regulate the practice of law

New cards
34

bar examination

required test to be eligible to practice law in a state

New cards
35

casebook approach

teaching of law by reading appellate court opinions

New cards
36

Socratic method

Q&A format to force students to use their reason to see things for themselves

New cards
37

venire

term for summoning jurors; "to cause/make come"

New cards
38

voir dire

"to speak the truth"; process of questioning jurors

New cards
39

jury consultants

experts hired by attorneys to help them determine what type of person is more likely to favor their side

New cards
40

mistrial

"hung jury"; trial ended by legal error

New cards
41

federal courts

courts that hear cases dealing w/fed matters; 1

New cards
42

state courts

courts that hear disputes about the laws of one state; 50

New cards
43

state court system

can differ, larger states tend to have more appellate levels

  • ex. NH original jurisdiction courts → NH Supreme Court

New cards
44

court actors

court-triad/courtroom community = judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys

New cards
45

overview of criminal process

crime > enters system > prosecution > adjudication > sentencing > corrections

New cards
46

Buried Bodies Case / "Lake Pleasant Case" (1974)

Robert Garrow kidnappes 3 kids, murders 1 - found guilty

  • represented by Armani & Belge

  • prev record of SA

  • possible 2 other murders

  • Armani & Belge charged but faced no time - quit law

New cards
47

adversarial ethic

calls on criminal defense lawyers to make the best possible case, within the rules, for the client, regardless of how heinous the crime the client may have committed

New cards
48

Gideon v. Washington (1963)

6th Amen requires free legal counsel to those who can't afford (appointment system)

  • Garrows gets Belge

New cards
49

Clark v. Arizona (2006)

insanity rule is substantially open to the state's choice

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 1 person
808 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 16 people
847 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 30 people
704 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 54 people
185 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 181 people
919 days ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 35 people
243 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 3 people
51 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 21 people
612 days ago
5.0(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (59)
studied byStudied by 3 people
147 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (35)
studied byStudied by 10 people
549 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (415)
studied byStudied by 6 people
631 days ago
4.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 5 people
701 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (104)
studied byStudied by 117 people
371 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 29 people
423 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (57)
studied byStudied by 17 people
707 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (40)
studied byStudied by 35 people
33 minutes ago
5.0(1)
robot