Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
What is Walker’s reasoning for Proposition 6: Simply putting more cops on the street will not reduce crime?
The theory of deterrence doesn’t work as expected. The Kansas City experiment showed that the belief in police presence deters crime even if police are not present. Offenders don’t see police patrol as a meaningful threat, and many crimes occur indoors, where police can’t suppress them
What is Walker’s reasoning for Proposition 7: Faster response time will not produce more arrests or lower the crime rate?
By the time the police are called, many cases have gone “cold”, or the offender has gotten away.
What is Walker’s reasoning for Proposition 8: Carefully planned and focused problem-oriented policing strategies can be successful in reducing crime and disorder?
The Boston Gun Project and the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence, which included police enforcement, community meetings, led to a significant reduction in gang-member involved homicides.
What is Walker’s reasoning for Proposition 9: More detectives, or other changes in detective work, will not raise clearance rates or lower the crime rate?
It’s not the quantity of detectives that is the issue; it’s the unreliability of scientific crime detection methods. Fingerprints, for example, or often unreliable.
What is Walker’s reasoning for Proposition 10: The Supreme Court Rulings in Mapp and Miranda are not significant barriers to effective crime control by the police?
The Miranda warning is often misunderstood, it only needs to be given before questioning. So, many suspects waive their rights and confess or make incriminating statements.