Behavioral FINA Short Answer + Computations

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/17

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

18 Terms

1
New cards

Q1. What is the difference between a good company and a good stock?

A good company is one with strong fundamentals (e.g., quality management, growth, innovation), but it may be overpriced. A good stock is one that's undervalued relative to its fundamentals — its price is low compared to its intrinsic value. Key idea: Price ≠ Value. Example: Tesla may be a good company, but if overpriced, it may be a bad stock. Mnemonic: V ≠ P Rule (Value is not always Price).

2
New cards

Q2. Compare Representativeness and Anchoring. How do they bias decisions?

Representativeness: Judging based on similarity to a stereotype (e.g., assuming a startup will succeed because it resembles Apple). Anchoring: Over-relying on an initial value (e.g., stock purchase price). Mnemonic: SAB = Stereotype vs. Anchor Bias. Rep = pattern matching, base-rate neglect. Anchor = sticky thinking, insufficient updating.

3
New cards

Q3. Emotion-Based vs. Rational Decision-Making — Are they incompatible?

Rational decisions rely on logic and optimization (e.g., EUT). Emotion-based ones are intuitive, influenced by feelings (e.g., fear, regret). Emotions may impair or enhance decisions. They're not always incompatible. Skilled traders often balance both. Mnemonic: FEAR = Feelings Erode Analytical Rationality — but not always destructively.

4
New cards

Q4. What is the intuition behind the regression: LTIV = f(Size, B/M, MQ)?

The regression shows that investors associate high long-term investment value with large firms, low B/M (growth stocks), and strong management. But this contradicts empirical data (which shows small value firms outperform). Biases: Representativeness (big = good) and anchoring on firm image. Mnemonic: BIG-MIS = Big firms and MQ are Misleading Indicators of Success.

5
New cards

Q5. Why do people assign different weights to winner vs. loser stocks in retirement accounts?

Due to Disposition Effect (selling winners, holding losers), Self-Attribution (crediting success to skill), and House Money Effect (riskier with gains). Investors treat gains/losses differently, leading to biased weighting. Mnemonic: DISH = Disposition, Internal credit (self-attribution), and House money.

6
New cards

Q6. Are stock market forecasters overconfident? Do they learn from mistakes?

Yes — they display overconfidence, particularly miscalibration. They give narrow confidence intervals. Some learning occurs, but it's slow and biased due to self-attribution bias. Also, success reinforces confidence (even if due to luck). Mnemonic: CLOSE = Confidence, Learning is slow, Overtrading, Self-attribution, Experience backfires.

7
New cards

Q7A. Define and distinguish Momentum and Reversal.

Momentum: Short-term persistence in returns. Investors buy recent winners (0-6 months). Reversal: Long-term mean-reversion — losers outperform, winners underperform (3-5 years). Mnemonic: MR = Momentum-Reversal: Momentum = Ride the wave; Reversal = What goes up, must come down.

8
New cards

Q7B. Explain Mean-Reversion vs. Continuation in the BSV Model (optional).

BSV Model explains both momentum and reversal using representativeness and conservatism. Continuation arises when investors underreact short-term (conservatism). Reversal arises when overreaction (representativeness) sets in. Mnemonic: BSV = Behavioral Switching View.

9
New cards

Q7C. Define Size Factor and Book-to-Market Factor.

Size Factor: Small-cap stocks tend to outperform large caps. Book-to-Market (Value) Factor: High B/M (value) stocks outperform low B/M (growth). These are part of Fama-French 3-Factor Model. Mnemonic: SF/BMF = Size Factor / Book-Market Factor: Size = small wins; B/M = cheap wins.

10
New cards

Q7D. Compare Risk-Based vs. Behavioral Explanations for anomalies.

Risk-Based: Anomalies reflect unmeasured risk (e.g., small firms are riskier). Behavioral: Mispricing due to biases (e.g., overconfidence, anchoring). Arbitrage is limited, so biases persist. Mnemonic: RA vs. BA = Rational Adjustments vs. Behavioral Anomalies.

11
New cards
How do you calculate Expected Utility?
Use: E[U] = p1 × U(w1) + p2 × U(w2). Example: 50% chance of £22K or £18K, U(w) = ln(w). → E[U] ≈ 0.5ln(22000) + 0.5ln(18000) = ~9.895.
12
New cards
How do you calculate Certainty Equivalent (CE)?
U(CE) = E[U]. Invert the utility function. Example: ln(CE) = 9.895 ⇒ CE = e^9.895 ≈ £19,847.
13
New cards
How do you calculate Risk Premium (RP)?
RP = E(W) – CE. Example: Expected Wealth = £20,000, CE = £19,847 ⇒ RP = £153.
14
New cards
What is the Mean-Variance Utility formula?
U = E(r) – 0.05Aσ² (A = risk aversion coefficient). Higher A → lower utility for high variance. Choose asset with highest U.
15
New cards
How do you find Max Willingness to Pay (e.g., for insurance)?
Set E[U(No Insurance)] = E[U(With Insurance)]. Solve for the premium I. U(£100 – I) = E[U]. Example: I = £19 when E[U] = 9 ⇒ √(100 – I) = 9.
16
New cards
How do you calculate Value under Prospect Theory?
Use: V = π(p) × v(x). E.g., π(0.001) = 0.011, v(£5000) = 5000^0.8 ≈ 1799 ⇒ V = 0.011 * 1799 ≈ 19.79.
17
New cards
What is the formula for Absolute Risk Aversion (ARA)?
ARA = –U″(x)/U′(x). Measures aversion to small, local risks. Decreasing ARA → more willing to take risk as wealth increases.
18
New cards
What is the formula for Relative Risk Aversion (RRA)?
RRA = –x × U″(x)/U′(x). Adjusts for wealth. Constant RRA implies investor’s relative aversion doesn’t change with wealth.