1/34
Exam 2, Lectures 17 & 18
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Self and Identity Development in Adolescence
Changes in the way we see and feel about ourselves occur throughout the lifespan
Adolescence marks the first restructuring of one’s sense of self at a time when they can appreciate the significance of these changes
During which the individual has enough of other kinds of maturity, especially cognitive maturity, but also peer relationships, that enable one to see it in a different/nuanced/more complex way than is true of earlier in development.
Instigators of Change in Self and Identity
Physical changes of puberty
Appearance
Relationships with others
People begin to react to these changes in physical appearance
Cognitive changes → the ability to do abstract thinking, and thinking about the possibility of selves is a shift in how one sees themselves
Imagine possible selves
Prospective self→ become pretty salient during adolescent transition, and impact on current behavior
Develop a future orientation
Psychosocial changes (all related but not identical)
What are the changes in Self & Identity?
In self-conceptions - how I think of myself
In self-esteem - how I value myself
In sense of identity - identity development in the formal sense
Changes in Self-Conceptions
Self-conception is the way individuals think about and characterize themselves (traits and attributes) → things that are defining for that individual
For children, an undifferentiated list of characteristics is most common, more heavily physical in younger children (I have brown hair, etc.), but gradually including other characteristics later (I have lots of friends, etc.)
During adolescence, more complex, abstract self-conceptions develop
Differentiated self-concept:
Actual self - behavioral, but nuanced characteristic (ex: “I’m generally pretty shy, but when I am with my friends, I’m comfortable and can interact”)
Becomes more complex, characterizing oneself in a more abstract way
Ideal self - liking to see oneself as a particular kind of person, who one aspires to be
Feared self - a sense of self differentiated from what one would ideally like to be, and be seen as, versus what one is worried about actually being seen as
Changes in Self-Esteem
Self-esteem
How an individual feels about him or herself
Baseline self-esteem is fairly stable over time
Baseline self-esteem: The way that adolescents typically feel about themselves overall (e.g., “I am a good person”)
Adolescents’ feelings about themselves fluctuate day by day
Barometric self-esteem: The way that adolescents feel about themselves depending on specific events of that day (e.g., “I feel bad that I was mean to my friend”)
Declines in Self Esteem
Consistently seen in about 20% of middle or junior high school students
Special difficulties with stage/environment fit (Eccles et al.)
Typically at-risk students in a context that has a weak or negative school climate
Similarly at-risk students in positive school climates often show an increase in self-esteem and performance
Similar changes in outcomes found for boys and girls
Dealing with a highly plastic brain, with a lot of neuroplasticity during the adolescent period. By virtue of being so plastic, it is highly sensitive to experience, with impacts across the board.
Particularly important impact on at risk students, whether it’s a positive or negative school environment
Changes in Self-Esteem Through Adolescence
During early adolescence
Increased volatility in barometric self-image
Different trajectories for different adolescents
Young adolescents with the most volatile barometric self- esteem report the highest levels of anxiety, tension, psychosomatic symptoms, and irritability
Volatility in self-esteem is one manifestation of difficulties in self-regulation
Differences in Self-Esteem
Gender differences in self-esteem (boys > girls)
become smaller over course of adolescence
more pronounced among white and Puerto Rican teens
less pronounced among African-American teens
Middle-class > lower SES
have higher self-esteem than their less-affluent peers
SES discrepancy grows larger over the course of adolescence
Shift from structural and systemic patterns of SES, transferring over to the person/individual level, with an ideology that these are all merit based differences, is that process of cooling out
African-American girls > white/Hispanic girls
Do not feel as negative about appearance
Have higher overall self-esteem
Show less of a decline in self-esteem over adolescence
Antecedents and Consequences of High Self-Esteem
Across all socio-demographic groups, self-esteem is related to:
Parental approval
Peer support
Success in school
Teens who derive self-esteem mainly from peers, rather than teachers or parents, show more behavioral problems and poorer school achievement
The Adolescent Identity Crisis
Erikson’s Theoretical Framework
The establishment of a coherent sense of identity is the chief psychosocial crisis of adolescence
Modern in the sense that there is a level of mobility that exists, and identity aspirations are achievable as a result → Has grown into a choice question
The fifth of eight “crises” across the lifespan - Choice point in adolescence is the identity
Exploration → if there is a choice, it is only really a choice if you have the ability to explore different identities
Commitment → relatively stable over time, a stable enough to guide a sense of how you interact with the world
Identity achievement
Psychologically desirable destination; you have gone through a process of exploration and after some period of time, level of experience, and level of maturity, it settles into a sense of an identity achieved
Moratorium
Most characteristic of the adolescent transitional point, exploration is ongoing, but it hasn’t arrived at an endpoint, and is making progress towards identity achievement
Identity foreclosure
Commitment to an identity, but in the absence of any real exploration (accepted identity, or maybe a passed down identity)
Identity diffusion
Associated with the least desirable outcomes; not exploring possibilities and not making any commitment with any identities; almost always has a substantially problematic developmental history (chaotic attachment, dysfunctional families, and developmental psychopathology)
The Adolescent Identity Crisis: Identity versus Identity Diffusion
The adolescent’s identity results from a mutual recognition between the young person and society
“Psychosocial”stages - internal sense of self and society’s response to me
The adolescent forges an identity, but at the same time society identifies the adolescent
Key to resolution lies in social interactions (according to Erikson)
Both have to be operative - mutual recognition between the individual and society
In the case of adolescents → peers
Problems in Identity Development: Identity diffusion
Identity diffusion → associated with the most problematic outcomes
incoherent, disjointed, incomplete sense of self
Without resolution, it is associated with a variety of particular psychological problems, and problems navigating the world as well
Tends to have a developmental history along the lines of dysfunctional family histories, problems with attachment, etc.
Problems in Identity Development: Identity Foreclosure
Identity Foreclosure → no moratorium that has led to it, it's just there, or has always been presumed to be there. Becomes problematic for individuals, may be successful but not because they arrived at their own commitments. The main risk comes later on, when all of a sudden the person realizes they aren’t happy doing what they are doing. Less life fluidity by this point.
bypassing the period of exploration and experimentation
Collective identity: adopting a full set of identifiers as one’s own (“tribal”?)
Adopted an identity of a collective
Problems in Identity Development: Negative Identity
Negative Identity
identities that are undesirable to parents or the community
Accepting an identity that’s undesirable to parents or to the larger community having been presented with messaged that you are an undesirable
More likely to adopt anti-social behavior/identity
Mutual rejection between individual and society
The Social Context of Identity Development: Secular (History)
Course of identity development varies by culture and historical era
“Identity” is a relatively new feature of “modernity” – not until some level of choice is possible (e.g., not feudal)
Many more career options for women than in the past means more complicated choices to make
Increased time demands for “preparation”
The more alternatives that are available, the more difficult it may be to narrow down and establish a sense of identity
Because of these complications, adolescents may benefit from a “time out” to figure out identity before entering adult roles
The Social Context of Identity Development: Psychosocial Moratorium
“Time out” from excessive responsibilities and obligations
Experiment with different roles
Luxury of the affluent if introspection interferes with survival
A moratorium is a healthy transition in adolescence, but not everybody has that available to them
Research on Identity Development
Identity generally not established before age 18, and currently, often later (emerging adulthood; developmental maturity of the brain)
During college, vocational plans solidify
but not religious and political beliefs
College may prolong psychosocial moratorium
especially for political and religious beliefs
Individuals may move from one identity status to another, particularly during adolescent and young adult years
Gender-Role Development
Gender Intensification Hypothesis:
Sex differences result from societal pressure to act in stereotypically masculine/feminine ways
Androgyny is being both masculine and feminine
Androgynous females and masculine males report higher self-esteem than do their peers
Autonomy
Independence
An individual’s capacity to behave on his or her own
Autonomy
Emotional components (feeling separate from parents)
Behavioral components (the growth of independent decision making)
Cognitive components (developing personal beliefs and values)
Contrasting Contemporary Trends
Today’s teens spend much more time away from the direct supervision of adults than prior generations
But today’s teens also have become more economically reliant on their families than prior generations
Types of Autonomy
Emotional Autonomy
Gaining emotional independence in relationships with others, especially parents
Behavioral Autonomy
Making independent decisions and following through on them
Value Autonomy
Developing an independent set of beliefs and principles, resisting peer and parental pressures
Development of Emotional Autonomy
Measuring emotional autonomy by examining:
Extent to which teens de idealize parents
Extent to which teens see parents as people
Non-dependency (the extent to which adolescents depend principally on themselves, rather than on parents)
External → internal self-regulation in the emotional domain; co-regulation still exists
Taking ownership of one’s own emotions is a huge component of emotional development/autonomy
Extent to which the adolescent feels individuated within the relationship with his/her parents → emotionally connected to them but not reliant or dependent on them for the stability and progress of their emotional life; important to have emotional support as well
Development of Emotional Autonomy: Individuation Triggers
Changes in a teen's appearance provoke changes in how teens view themselves and how parents view teens. This alters parent-adolescent interactions
Healthy individuation is fostered by close rather than distance family relationships → emotionally close, but not determinitive
Social-cognitive development stimulates movement toward individuation
Special, ideal state of emotional autonomy that has healthy relationships and supportive functional attachment relationships
Development of Emotional Autonomy: Emotional Autonomy and Parenting Practices
Healthy individuation and positive mental health are fostered by close, not distant, family relationships
Conditions that encourage both individuation and emotional closeness facilitate autonomy
Development of Behavioral Autonomy
Changes in susceptibility to influence
Conformity to peers is higher during early and middle adolescence
Parents are more influential regarding long-term issues, basic values
Peers’ opinions are more influential for day-to-day matters (music tastes or clothing style)
Development of Behavioral Autonomy: Parenting Styles
Adolescents whose parents are authoritarian or permissive are most easily influenced by peers, especially in antisocial situations
Adolescents from authoritative homes are less susceptible to antisocial peer pressure but more so to positive peers
The Development of Value Autonomy
Moral Reasoning Development
How individuals think about moral dilemmas and make moral judgments
Lawrence Kohlberg’s Theory
Used morally challenging stories (Heinz)
More interested in the reasoning behind people’s explanations than whether the answer was right or wrong
The Development of Value Autonomy: Kohlberg’s Three Stages Of Moral Reasoning
Preconventional Moral Reasoning (worrying about punishment/reward)
Egocentric reasoning
Conventional Moral Reasoning (following societal rules and norms)
Pressure to follow rules/norms
Postconventional Moral Reasoning (most abstract and advanced)
Deep discussions about the obligations under social contracts and how social contracts are constructed at that point
The Development of Value Autonomy: Moral Development during Adolescence
Moral Development during Adolescence
Research has shown that moral behavior does not always match moral reasoning
Often make the choice first, and use moral reasoning after to justify it
It's not how you get to the decision that drives the decision, it’s how do you reconcile the decision after you’ve already made it on other grounds
Contextual factors influence how a person acts when facing moral dilemmas in the real world
Carol Gilligan
Argues against Kohlberg, says his theory is gender-biased
Women may use a care orientation to moral dilemmas
Men may use a justice orientation
Research has not supported Gilligan’s argument about a different form of moral reasoning, but does suggest a gender difference in the focus of moral reasoning.
The Development of Value Autonomy: Political Thinking
Becomes more abstract
Becomes less authoritarian and less rigid
Becomes more principled (an increase in a consistent set of attitudes; an ideology)
May be context specific – ideology in authoritarian societies
The Development of Value Autonomy: Religious Beliefs
Become more abstract, more principled, and more independent during the adolescent years
The stated importance of religion—and participation in an organized religion—declines somewhat during the adolescent years
Distinction: spirituality, religiosity
Belonging to a congregation buffers some adversity, but source is unclear (purpose, value system, community support, other)