1/308
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
science is both a ________ and _________
body of knowledge and the process for building that knowledge
the process of science relies on the ___________
testing of ideas with evidence gathered from the natural world
what does it mean to think scientifically?
1) questioning and problem solving
2) learn through experimentation
3) subject your ideas and beliefs to testing
4) consider alternate explanations
5) be open to the idea that you are wrong
what does it mean to behave scientifically?
1) pay attention to what other people have already done
2) expose your ideas to testing
3) assimilate the evidence
4) openly communicate ideas and tests to others
5) play fair: act with scientific integrity
what is pseudoscience?
science not based on data or evidence
what are examples of pseudoscience?
phrenology, blood letting, subluxation, astrology, homeopathy
scientific method
1) Observations
2) Lead to Questions
3) Questions form Hypotheses
4) Hypotheses must be tested through experimentation
5) Analyze Data
6) Draw Conclusions
7) Share Results
the real process of science is ______, ________, and _____________
complex, iterative, and can take many different paths
hypothesis
a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence, a starting point for further investigation
a well-formed hypothesis is...
1) reasoned and informed
2) able to explain relationship between variables
3) directional
4) testable
a well-formed hypothesis is not...
1) a question, goal, or purpose
2) always supported by your data/findings
dependent variable
depends on IV, measured variable, output
independent variable
manipulated, has an effect on DV, input, can have levels
Identify the IV and DV:
- blood cholesterol level
- saturated fatty acid intake
- DV
- IV
Identify the IV and DV:
- body temperature
- regional vascular blood flow
- IV
- DV
Identify the IV and DV:
- body temperature
- environmental temperature
- DV
- IV
Hypothesis: deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves cortical function
The DV is:
cortical function
Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that genetic deletion of Robo4 protects against endothelial dysfunction associated with high fat diet.
a) endothelial dysfunction is IV, genetic deletion of Robo4 is DV
b) endothelial dysfunction is DV, genetic deletion of Robo4 is IV
c) both are IVs
d) both are DVs
b) endothelial dysfunction is DV, genetic deletion of Robo4 is IV
Hypothesis: maternal high fat diet creates fetal hypoxemia and increases utilization of amino acids for energy production and early activation of gluconeogenic pathways in the fetal liver.
the IV is:
a) maternal high fat diet
b) fetal hypoxemia
c) amino acids
d) gluconeogenic pathways
a) maternal high fat diet
Hypothesis: Interleukin-1 receptor activation after systemic inflammation undermines phrenic long-term facilitation, a model of respiratory motor plasticity.
The DV is:
a) interleukin-1 receptor activation
b) systemic inflammation
c) phrenic long-term facilitation
d) respiratory motor plasticity
c) phrenic long-term facilitation
writing a hypothesis:
1) relates your independent and dependent variables
2) is a prediction
3) should not include justification (in observation)
scientific theory
a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation
hypothesis vs theory
- hypothesis deal with narrow set of phenomena
- theory applies to a wide range of phenomena
control groups
provide a baseline for comparison in a treatment intervention
controlled variables rule out ______ _______
alternate factors
historically, _______ were the decision makers
editors
the peer review process
1) author submits paper to journal editor
2) paper is sent to 3-5 experts in the field
3) they either accept, revise, or reject and send back
what's the point of peer review?
-new scientific knowledge is vetted by experts in a relevant field
-trusted form of scientific communication
what are advantages of peer review?
- international standardized process
- save time reviewing submissions
- vetted by experts
- level of quality and trust
what are disadvantages of peer review?
- no quantitative indicators of quality
- biases against findings/researchers
- different standards
- time
- reviewers are human
- reviewers are not blind to author
- doesn't mean science is correct
open access benefits
- more available
- public access research they fund
- access for smaller libraries and low-income economies
- makes use of modern technology
what is a retraction?
removal of a published article from a journal
what might lead to a retraction?
- errors in data analysis/methodology
- scientific misconduct: fraud of data, plagiarism, duplicate publishing
how do authors decide where to publish?
-research topic, field, discipline
-notoriety and prestige of journal
-novelty or quality of findings
-cost
-impact factor
-accessibility
what are pre-prints?
full draft version of a research manuscript shared in an open-access repository prior to the peer-review process
what are advantages of pre-prints?
- share research quickly
- open access
- early feedback
- visibility of research
- allows revisions
what are disadvantages of pre-prints?
- not peer-reviewed (credibility concerns and limited accountability)
- publication bias
- misinterpretation of pre-print vs peer-reviewed articles
should you cite a pre-print?
maybe, some journals say yes but some say no
can you cite a pre-print in a manuscript that will be submitted for peer review?
yes
will pre-prints appear in PubMed?
yes
what is Web of Science made of?
top science journals
what is PubMed made of?
core medical journals
what is google scholar made of?
Master's theses, Ph.D. dissertations, books, medical journals from other countries, other journals
MeSH
- a predefined set of terms to connect you to the information you need
- revised annually to reflect changes in the literature and research
what does MeSH do?
organizes articles by assigning specific words to describe content
what are the 3 major guiding principles of the Belmont report?
1) respect for persons
2) beneficence
3) justice
respect for persons
protecting the autonomy of people
autonomy
a person's ability to act on their own values and interests
beneficence
do no harm
justice
fair distribution of cost and benefit
what are the roles of the Institutional Review Board (IRB)?
- meet and review all research proposals
- make decisions regarding study
- follow up on studies
- implement policies, procedures and documentation for review and follow up
who sits on an IRB?
a) faculty
b) clinicians
c) community members
d) all of the above
d) faculty, clinicians, and community members
what are factors to consider of the IRB?
- scientific merit
- perceived competence of investigators
- who are the participants? are they vulnerable?
- risk: benefit
- how are subjects being informed?
elements of consent
- voluntarily given
- withdrawn any time
What is assent?
can be given by minors who are old enough to make decisions
animal ethics
describes human-animal relationships and how animals ought to be managed and treated
why do we use animals in research?
1) to advance scientific understanding
2) to develop solutions to medical problems
3) to protect the safety of people, animals, and the environment
what are the benefits to using animals?
most human diseases exist in at least one other species
why are there no unnecessary animal experiments?
- strict control over animal use
- expensive
- biomedical funds are limited
- irrelevant or repetitive work is not funded or permitted
3 Rs in animal research
Replace - replace animal studies with other methods
Reduce - as many trials as required, as few as possible
Refine - minimize stress of study animals
Causes of animal deaths
900 million killed for food, 100 million killed by pet cats, 3.87 million used in research
what types of animals are used in research?
95% mice/rats, 4% fruit flies/zebrafish, 1% dogs/cats
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
- review and approve/reject all proposals involving animals
- inspect every 6 months
- monitor and investigate
what do the levels of evidence do?
- provide guidelines when searching for information
- assigned to studies based on quality of design, validity, applicability to patient care
what are the 3 types of reviews?
meta-analysis, systematic review, review
what are the 3 types of scientific studies?
randomized control trial, cohort, case-control
meta-analysis
- uses scientific studies that meet criteria to conduct new statistical analysis
- a type of systematic review
systematic reviews
- summarize scientific studies that meet criteria
- integrates findings from many published studies
- reduces bias over traditional literature reviews
review
- summarizes scientific studies (no criteria)
- not systematic, chosen articles can have selection bias
What type of review is this?
Some studies found that there was a significant association
between asthma and the risk of lung cancer. However, the
results are inconclusive. We searched the electronic
databases for all relevant articles. Odds ratio (OR) with 95%
confidence interval (CI) were used to calculate the strength of
the association between asthma and lung cancer risk. In the
stratified analysis by asthma definition, significant
associations were found between asthma and lung cancer in
self-reported subgroup, questionnaire subgroup, and register
databases subgroup. However, no significant association was
observed in physician-diagnosed asthma subgroup. In
conclusion, this suggests that asthma might be significantly
associated with lung cancer risk.
Meta-analysis
randomized controlled trial (RCT)
- experimental, randomly assigned to treatment or control
- "gold standard" for reliable evidence testing
cohort study
- observational, cohort has shared characteristic
- divided into subsets for comparison
- can be prospective or retrospective
case-control study
- observational, compares affected group to control group
- usually retrospective (outcome already known)
case report (case study)
- observational, novel/unique characteristic
- very few participants
- no control
expert opinion study
one expert's opinion based on their knowledge
Hierarchy of Evidence
1) Meta-Analysis
2) Systematic Review
3) Review
4) Randomized control trial
5) Cohort study
6) Case-control study
7) Case report
8) Expert's opinion
What kind of study is the Wakefield et. al study?
- 12 children
- mean age 6 years, range 3-10 yrs
- 11 boys
- children referred to a pediatric gastroenterology unit with history of normal development followed by loss of acquired skills, including language, together with diarrhea and abdominal pain
a) randomly controlled trial
b) cohort
c) case-control
d) case-study
d) case-study
You read an article published in The Washington Post on autism. This article is written by someone with a PhD and refers to studies conducted at Harvard University and the CDC. This is an example of:
a) a scholarly article
b) a popular article
c) both scholarly and popular
d) depends on whether the author was paid to write the article
b) a popular article
Which of the following is considered to be the highest level of scientific evidence?
a. randomized control trial
b. literature review
c. systematic review
d. meta-analysis
d. meta-analysis
Which section of a scientific article contains a summary of the article?
a. methods
b. abstract
c. discussion
d. introduction
b. abstract
Abstract
Aspirin is one of the most commonly used medications. We report a patient who presented with severe weakness, altered mental status and complete heart block requiring temporary pacing. Despite the patient's family denying that the patient used aspirin, an arterial blood gas that revealed a respiratory alkalosis and metabolic acidosis suggested the diagnosis of salicylate toxicity. The salicylate level was extremely elevated and the patient was successfully treated with haemodialysis. Our case illustrates that salicylate toxicity should be considered in a patient with a combined metabolic acidosis and respiratory alkalosis. This is-also the first case of salicylate toxicity causing complete heart block in an adult The heart block resolved with treatment of the salicylate toxicity.
a. meta-analysis
b. randomized controlled trial
c. cohort study
d. case-control study
e. case report
e. case report
what are tables used for?
to present many numeric values
where does the caption for a table go?
above the table
what is a table legend?
further info below table
what are figures used for?
to show patterns, trends, and relationships
where does the caption for a figure go?
below the figure
a good figure legend includes:
1. title
2. materials and methods
3. results
4. definitions
statistics help us:
1. reduce and describe data
2. quantify relationships
3. determine if data sets are similar/different
3 objectives of data analysis
1. data reduction
2. establish relationships
3. inference
data reduction objective
- reduce measures to make more meaningful
-averages, stdev, figures
establish relationships objective
- describe relationships between two observations
- causal - did something cause the other
inference objective
infer outcome from sample to population
why use samples when doing research?
too expensive to sample everyone (random selection)
what are the measures of central tendency?
mean, median, mode
Mean
arithmetic average of all values
Median
middle value in distribution
Mode
most frequently occuring value
What are the measures of variability?
standard deviation, range, confidence interval
Standard Deviation
variation that exists around the sample mean
Range
difference between high and low values of dataset