1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
What was the cold war? key features:
Post WW2- 89/91.
Highly competitive in nature, competing over ideological influence in the word.
Nuclear war tensions/ arms race dynamic.
Technological superiority.
Cold war took place through proxy wars
Decolonisation and local dynamics too -> supporting armed actors to undermine the others influence.
No direct conflict.
Economic dimension: capitalist vs. communist approach.
Intelligence actors as a means to an end or an end in itself?
Economic dominance/ military dominance
Or interest in domination intelligence sector.
Is the Cold War still relevant?
Similarities to modern period -> recognize signs, learn and understand high competition in international politics.
Some argue that CW cannot be generalised as it was so context specific
Others argue can draw upon and learn from it today.
Russians still think it matters -> Peaked politically so want to go back.
Still use methods.
Politically value to them so matters to us.
What is Decolonization in the Cold war context?
Decolonization:
One side would be back by US/USSR-> become part of CW.
Loss of influence and control of territories in the world
Independent governance of states -> competing over alignment of these newly independent states.
Instability of new states.
US prevent new states from becoming communist by intervening.
Reputational dynamic.
Order of economies, market access, political and military dynamics.
Can become threating if align another way - Cuba 62'
What key moment happened in 1949?
First Soviet atomic test → enters the nuclear dimension into the Cold War.
Creation of NATO= counter Eastern european bloc.
Problem of sources?
inherently secret activities: fractured record (classification, destruction, never officially recorded)
Certain sources focused on failure/ controversy?
Defectors, memoirs, whistleblowers.
Certain sources represent an attempt to manage contemporary image?
official histories, authorized memoirs.
Whose voices, perspectives recorded and whose not?
Need to understand what the sources represent (imperfect knowledge)