Citizenship, Immigration & Voting Rights

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
call with kaiCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/18

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 6:56 PM on 12/10/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

19 Terms

1
New cards

What was Frederick Douglass's "Composite Nation" speech about?

1869 speech advocating for Chinese immigration and multiracial American identity. Douglass argued America's strength comes from diversity

2
New cards

When and why did Douglass give the "Composite Nation" speech?

Between 1869-1875, during Reconstruction era after Civil War. Primary purpose: oppose anti-Chinese nativism (Chinese Exclusion Act later passed 1882). Delivered when Black Americans were gaining citizenship (14th Amendment 1868) and voting rights. Douglass extended equality argument beyond Black-white issues to include all races and immigrants.

3
New cards

What is the SAVE Act and when was it passed?

Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act - passed House April 10, 2025 (220-208, with 4 Democrats joining Republicans). Requires documentary proof of citizenship (passport, birth certificate, naturalization papers) presented IN PERSON to register to vote.

4
New cards

What are the key statistics about the SAVE Act's impact?

21.3 million voting-age citizens (9%) lack easy access to required documents. 69 million American women's names don't match birth certificates (marriage). 140 million Americans lack passports. Only 43% have passports. Only 5 states (MI, MN, NY, VT, WA) have IDs showing citizenship.

5
New cards

Who does the SAVE Act disproportionately affect?

Women (name changes from marriage), young voters, voters of color, rural voters (60M+ in rural areas), low-income voters (can't afford documents), transgender people (name/gender changes), people experiencing homelessness. Married women are especially affected - 69 million lack paperwork matching current names.

6
New cards

What is the current voter registration system that SAVE Act would change?

ational Voter Registration Act (NVRA, 1993) requires voters to attest citizenship under penalty of perjury and provide SSN or driver's license number.

7
New cards

What was Trump's birthright citizenship executive order?

Signed January 20, 2025 (first day of second term). Starting 30 days later, babies born in U.S. would NOT automatically get citizenship if parents are: (1) in U.S. illegally, OR (2) on temporary visas.

8
New cards

What is the 14th Amendment and why does it matter for birthright citizenship?

Ratified 1868 after Civil War to overturn Dred Scott (1857), which said Black people weren't citizens. States: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens."

9
New cards

What did the three district courts rule about Trump's birthright order?

All three judges blocked it as unconstitutional: Judge Coughenour (WA, Reagan appointee) called it "blatantly unconstitutional."

10
New cards

What did the Supreme Court rule in the birthright citizenship case (June 2025)?

6-3 ruling that partially paused nationwide injunctions, but DID NOT rule on whether order is constitutional.

11
New cards

What are "nationwide" or "universal" injunctions?

Court orders that block government from enforcing a law/policy ANYWHERE in the country, not just for parties in the lawsuit.

12
New cards

What did Justice Barrett's majority opinion say about nationwide injunctions?

No historical basis in early English or U.S. law.

13
New cards

What did the dissents argue in the birthright citizenship case?

Sotomayor (read from bench): Every court found order "patently unconstitutional." Majority "kneecaps" judiciary's power to stop Executive. Rights "meaningful in name only" for non-parties. Jackson: "Existential threat to the rule of law." Allows Executive to "violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued." Barrett's sharp response: Jackson "embracing an imperial Judiciary."

14
New cards

What is the connection between Douglass's speech and the 2025 documents?

Douglass (1869): Inclusive vision - all races can become Americans, migration is right, "composite nation" is strength. 2025 (SAVE Act & Birthright): Restrictive vision - make voting harder, limit birthright citizenship, fear of "anchor babies" and noncitizen voters. Shows America retreating from Reconstruction ideals of expansive citizenship.

15
New cards

How do all three documents relate to the 14th Amendment?

Douglass (1869): Celebrates 14th Amendment (ratified 1868), extends equality beyond Black-white to all races. SAVE Act (2025): Complicates 14th Amendment by making citizenship harder to prove for voting. Birthright Case (2025): Attempts to narrow 14th Amendment by ending birthright citizenship for some born in U.S.

16
New cards

What is "Wong Kim Ark" and why does it matter?

United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898): Supreme Court ruled 6-2 that person born in California to Chinese immigrant parents was U.S. citizen under 14th Amendment.

17
New cards

What was Dred Scott and how does it relate to these documents?

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): Notorious 7-2 Supreme Court decision ruling Black people whose ancestors were enslaved were not U.S. citizens and had no federal court protection. 14th Amendment (1868) specifically ratified to overturn this.

18
New cards

What are the three questions about belonging raised by these documents?

(1) Douglass asks: Who can BECOME American? (Everyone who wants to!), (2) SAVE Act asks: Who can PROVE they're American? (Only those with right documents), (3) Birthright case asks: Who IS American at birth? (Not decided yet, but order says "not everyone born here")

19
New cards

What did Douglass mean by "composite nationality"?

Vision of multiracial, multireligious nation where immigrants from all over world become Americans together.