Interpretation of diagnostic images

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/64

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

65 Terms

1
New cards

What do you need when approaching diagnostic imaging?

Recognition

Report

Analysis

2
New cards

Recognition

Spotting the abnormality

3
New cards

Report

Describing the abnormality

4
New cards

Analysis

Diagnosing the abnormality

5
New cards

What do you need?

Imaging study

An appropriate viewing area

Reference material

Reporting media

6
New cards

What is an adequate viewing area?

Dark room, light box, computer with high-resolution monitor, etc

7
New cards

Reference amterials can include

8
New cards

Reporting media can be

patient record,

9
New cards

If you increase the x rays reaching film then you

increase the film blackening

10
New cards

If your tissue is increasing in radio-opacity, then

increased x ray absorption leading to decreased image blackening/density

11
New cards

Metal and bone appear

white on radiographs

12
New cards

Soft tissue and fluid appear

grey on radiographs

13
New cards

Gas appears

black on radiographs

14
New cards

When should you assess image quality?

Before interpretation

15
New cards

Inadequate image quality can lead to

false positives and false negatives

16
New cards

If a potential diagnostic image is not good enough then you should

REPEAT it!

17
New cards

3 stage approach: Phase 1

Look at everything. Recognize what you can.

18
New cards

3 stage approach: Phase 2

Report, identify, and describe abnormalities

19
New cards

3 stage approach: Phase 3

Interpret/analysis, make a diagnosis, generate a ddx (most likely to least)

Plan further investigation/treatments

20
New cards

Recognition (Stage 1) should include

Systematic search of the ENTIRE image (system by system or area by area)

21
New cards

Key points of recognition:

Do not get distracted by obvious lesions, read the whole image

Remember at least two orthogonal views

22
New cards

Orthogonal views means

views at 90 degree angles from each other

23
New cards

Insert images from lecture

I

24
New cards

nsert images from lecture

25
New cards

How can you report abnormalities in a diagnostic image?

YOU NEED TO KNOW NORMAL

26
New cards

Descriptors to describe changes in diagnostic images (Roentgen Signs)

Size, shape, margin, number, position/location, opacity/echogenicity/signal, internal structure, function (dynamic studies and US)

27
New cards

What can cause increased size on diagnostic images?

Hypertrophy, hyperplasia, inflammation, neoplasia, edema, congestion, torsion, cystic disease

28
New cards

What can cause decreased size on diagnostic images?

Atrophy, hypoplasia, congenital effects

29
New cards

What can cause abnormal shape/margins?

Trauma, hypertrophy, hyperplasia, neoplasia, abscesses, necrosis, ulceration, hematoma

30
New cards

What can cause loss of visibility in diagnostic images?

Surrounding disease (free fluid →altered opacity of nearby organs)

31
New cards

What can cause increased number of normal structures in diagnostic images?

Accessory development centers, congenital abnormality

32
New cards

What can cause decreased number of normal structures in diagnostic images?

Anomaly, extopia, previous surgery

33
New cards

What can cause a small number of lesions in diagnostic images?

Primary disease

34
New cards

What can cause a large number of lesions in diagnostic images?

Malignancy, metastatic

35
New cards

What can cause abnormal position or displacement in diagnostic images?

Adjacent mass or organ/space enlargement, Traction, torsion, hernia/rupture, ectopia

36
New cards

What can cause an increased opacity in radiographic images?

Fluid/soft tissue accumulation, mineralization

37
New cards

What can cause a decreased opacity in radiographic images?

Air accumulation, decreased bone density, fat accumulation

38
New cards

What can cause alteration in US and CT images?

Inflammation, neoplasia, rupture, congenital

39
New cards

During interpretation, generate differentials for

All abnormalities (some may be incidental)

40
New cards

Structured list of differentials should be presented with

most likely first

41
New cards

A differential that explains all changes should be

ranked higher/first

42
New cards

Consider other clinical findings, they may

influence your differential list, some may be insignificant

43
New cards

What does VITAMIN D stand for? V:

Vascular

44
New cards

What does VITAMIN D stand for? I:

Infalmmatory/infectious

45
New cards

What does VITAMIN D stand for? T

Traumatic, toxic

46
New cards

What does VITAMIN D stand for? A

Anomalous (including congenital)

47
New cards

What does VITAMIN D stand for? M

Metabolic

48
New cards

What does VITAMIN D stand for? 2nd I

Iatrogenic, Idiopathic

49
New cards

What does VITAMIN D stand for? N

Neoplastic, Nutritional

50
New cards

What does VITAMIN D stand for? D

Degenerative

51
New cards

Imaging report: Patient and Study details

Patient ID, breed, age, Date of study, iamges obtained (views and modalities)

52
New cards

Imaging report: Image quality

53
New cards

Imaging report: Description

54
New cards

Imaging report: Summarize and differentials

55
New cards

Imaging report: Refine differential list

56
New cards

Imaging report: Plan

57
New cards

Informed interpretation Pros:

Allows you to be aware of history prior to image interpretation

58
New cards

Informed interpretation Cons:

Risk of bias, over reading images (look for disease when no disease is present)

59
New cards

Blind interpretation Pros:

No bias, less likely to terminate examination early

60
New cards

Blind interpretation cons:

Longer and less structured differential list

61
New cards

“Blind Interpretation is most commonly

A second opinion

62
New cards

Search errors:

You missed the lesion (or interpreted it as normal)

You did not look at the entire image

You did not note absence of normal structure

Possibly due to inadequate image quality

Failure to assess complex area (ex skull)

63
New cards

Under-reading errors

Failure to identify lesion

Failure to consider appropriate differentials (avoided with blind film reading)

Failing to reconsider differentials when presented with new evidence

64
New cards

Over-reading errors

Not recognizing breed/species variations

Identifying normal features as pathology

Failure to recognize non-diagnostic images

Mistaking an incidental finding for significant pathology

65
New cards

Analysis errors

Generation of incorrect or incomplete differential list

Inappropriate further investigation recommendations