1/25
JESUS IS GOOD.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Democracy
a political regime associated with 'rule of the people' through elections and civil/political rights
Substantive definition of democracy
Include wide participation, fair representation, tolerance, engagement, etc.
Procedural definition of democracy
In a minimalist definition, is easy to measure, to capture. It is essentially what holds the elections and have civil political rights
A history of democracy
'Democratic' practices can be found in many societies throughout history and the world
I.e., Indigenous norms of deliberation and consensus-seeking
Liberal democracy's origins are in ancient Greece and Rome;
13th century England (Magna Carta)
Later-18th century American and French Revolutions
Samuel Huntington's (1991) three 'waves' of democratization
Democracy was expected to develop the world at this point
Does Democracy Matter?
Meta-analysis of over 600 academics journal articles; over 1,100 case studies
Asks if democracy matters beyond political freedom and participation
Positive effects finding of does democracy matter
For human rights, transparency, public health, human development, quality of government, int'l trade
weak/null effects findings
for inequality, public spending, inflation, social transfer programs
overall findings for does democracy matter
democracy's impact on governance is slightly positive. Democracies appear to be better governed overall
Democracy and Economic Growth
The relationship has long been debated
Some argue there is a positive (but weak) relationship
Some argue there is an inverse relationship
Some argue there is an negative relationship
Some argue the relevance of intersecting factors
I.e., Human capital, state capacity
Democracy has not been shown to be either a necessary or sufficient condition for economic growth
Modernization theory is conducive to democratization
Freedom in the World
2024 saw the 19th consecutive year of global freedom score decline
Over 40% of countries holding elections faced violence, suppression
Europe is the world's freest region
While 9 countries saw improvements, 7 countries experienced declines
Facing issues related to migration crackdowns and political violence
Global concerns include armed conflict, state repression, persecution of the media, organized crime and elected leaders undermining democratic practices
Three ways to measure democracy
1) freedom house’s global freedom score
2) Varieties of Democracy (V-DEM)
3) The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index
freedom house’s global freedom score
40 indicators for political rights, 60 for civil rights
Varieties of Democracy (V-DEM)
Measures of electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative, and egalitarian forms of democracy
The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index
60 indicators measuring pluralism, civil rights, government functioning, political participation and political culture
Democracy-related sociolegal issues in liberal socieites
Access to justice
Anti-liberal sentiments
Political polarization and extremism
Political polarization feedback loop
Echo chamber
Identity politics
Immigration and nationalism
Economic inequality
Liberal state response to democratic decline
while some leaders have played a role in driving democratic backsliding (i.e., Hungary), others have taken actions to counter threats to democracy (i.e., Germany)
The liberal state are multi-faced when it comes to liberal decline
Ex. Freedom of speech
Governments in liberal societies have been the source of democratic backsliding
At the same time some governments have been the source in fighting democratic backsliding
Ex. Germany made things about nazi illegal, regulating against fascism, against violent anti-liberal ideas
Democratic backsliding is when we see indicators of democracy falling
The state is not inherently democratic
Democratic backsliding is when
we see indicators of democracy falling
Civil society response to democratic decline
is itself a necessary pillar of democracy (advocacy, monitoring, publicizing)
Also includes anti-democratic forces (i.e., actors, ideologies, mis/disinformation, violent political discourse, etc.)
Includes pro-democracy forces (i.e., independent media, NGOs)
Civil societies are not pro-democratic either
Ex. NGOs, independent media
Independent is not state-funded nor corporate funded
Ex. Of independent is Democracy Now
Civil societies are necessary, but sufficient condition for democracy
Civil societies are not inherently democratic, it is necessary for democracy, but is not inherently democracy
Think of it like an oxymoron
Ex. Populist groups are anti-democratic, but they are civil societies, they are movements
Misinformation and disinformation coming from civil societies
You cannot have a liberal society without civil societies
Markets/business response to democratic decline
are often neutral to democratic backsliding
Applied the logic of the market, if it works them then they benefit from it
They have adapted to it, supported it, benefitted from it or avoided democratic backsliding
CSR does not operate against their profit-based interest
Social venture capitalism is investment on market processes, businesses process, or stocks that have to do with social progress and with goods
They find a market logic that aligns with them
Ex. TOMS shoes started off with every shoe they sell, they will give one for free around the world
TOMS started off as a social enterprise, profit driven, but also social driven
They are making a business case for the social activity, applying market logic to deal with social activity
Ex. Bill and Melinda's foundation has market principles for climate change
It is an enterprise, so if it is not economically viable, they will throw it out
So, it is about how to make profit on it
Social venture capitalism in markets/business response
Is investment on markets process, business process, or stocks that have to do with social progress, with goods
Theories of democracy
Elite theory of democracy, pluralist theory of democracy, discourse theory of democracy, and democratic peace theory
Elite theory of democracy
I.e., Robert Michel's iron law of oligarchy
Elite interest to distract us from what the people are looking at
Ex. No one in the country of the US, rioting for Venezuela's president, Banduro to get arrested, only the elites wanted it
Our democracy is a guarantee of elite theory
Pluralist theory of democracy
I.e., Robert Dahl's notion of polyarchy
Og liberal idea of democracy
We are not one single group that dominates the political interest, the oligarchy is the small amount of interest
Polyarchy, is we can have equally interest that coexist together
Discourse theory of democracy
I.e., Jurgen Habermas' idea of communicative power
Frankfurt school of critical theory
Jurgen Habermas came up with the idea that democracy is not on elite power, instead he takes democracy as an discourse, an ongoing way of talking and understanding something
Communicative power is convincing that you way is better, the power to make other people frame the way they think
People with communicative power will dominate
Democratic peace theory
I.e., Immanuel Kant's Perpetual Peace
It stood true for some time, like democracy don't fight each other
Two liberals democracies don't fight each other, because Russia is a democracy, but has fought other democracies, so it has to be liberal
So, if it was liberal theories then this theory will still hold/stand true
Case study: the united states of america
The Declaration of Independence (1776) is central to modern democracy's emergence
US played a central role in the development of the post-WWII liberal international order
3 broad concerns
Rising inequality
Cultural change (individualism replacing civic-ness)
Political polarization
Gini coefficient
South Africa has the highest Gini coefficient
Differentiation between black and white community from the apartheid