learning and motivation unit three (week 10)
Pintrich: self-regulated learning
self-regulated learning
learners are viewed as active participants in the learning process
learners have the potential for control
individuals can set goals and adapt
students have to be taught to be self-regulated learners
should be part of a broad learning strategy
remind students to change up their learning strategies depending on task type
give feedback on strategies
tell students they’re capable of becoming self-regulated learners
epistemic beliefs: beliefs about knowledge
Zimmerman: self-regulated learning
metacognition: awareness of and knowledge about one’s own thinking
simply asking students to self-record some aspect of their learning often leads to “spontaneous” improvements in functioning (reactivity)
students’ metacognition awareness of particular aspects of their functioning could enhance their self-control
self-regulation: self-generated thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that are oriented to attaining goals
proactive in their efforts to learn because they
are aware of their strengths and limitations
are guided by personally set goals and task-related strategies
monitor their behavior in terms of their goals
self-reflect on their increasing effectiveness
enhances their self-satisfaction and motivation to learn
self-regulated students are more likely to
succeed academically
view their futures optimistically
the ability to self-regulate is a life-long skill
involves the self-motivation, self-awareness, and behavioral skill to implement learned knowledge appropriately
self-regulation involves the selective use of specific processes that must be personally adapted to each learning task
setting proximal goals for oneself
adopting powerful strategies for attaining the goals
monitoring one’s performance for signs of progress
managing time efficiently
self-evaluating one’s method
attributing causation to results
structure of self-regulatory processes
forethought: processes and beliefs that occur before efforts to learn
task analysis: goal setting and strategic planning
self-motivation: students’ beliefs about learning
self-efficacy: having the personal capability to learn
outcome expectations: personal consequences of learning
intrinsic interest: students’ valuing of the task skill for its own means
learning goal orientation: valuing the process of learning for its own merits
performance: processes that occur during behavioral implementation
self-control: deployment of specific methods / strategies that were selected during the forethought phase
ex: imagery, self-instruction, attention focusing, and task strategies
self-observation: self-recording personal events / self-experimentation to find out the course of these events
self-monitoring: covert form of self-experimentation. one’s cognitive tracking of personal functioning.
self-reflection: processes that occur after each learning effort
self-judgment
self-evaluation: comparisons of self-observed performances against some standard
causal attribution: beliefs about the cause of one’s errors / successes
self-reaction
feelings of self-satisfaction and positive affect regarding one’s performance
increases in self-satisfaction enhance motivation
adaptive reactions: adjustments designed to increase the effectiveness of one’s method of learning
defensive reactions: efforts to protect one’s self-image by withdrawing / avoiding opportunities to learn and perform
self-regulatory processes are teachable and can lead to increases in students’ motivation and achievement
few teachers effectively prepare students to do well on their own
Dweck: mindsets
mindset: the view you adopt for yourself
fixed mindset: believing that your qualities are carved in stone
growth mindset: belief that your basic qualities are things you can cultivate through your efforts, your strategies, and help from others
everyone can grow and change
recognize the value of challenging themselves and the importance of effort
with a fixed mindset: individuals fear challenge and devalue effort
Achievement Motivation
motivation explains why people vary in the effort they invest in tasks
we recognize motivation by observing behavior
choice of behavior / direction
eagerness to engage
effort and persistence
quality of cognitive engagement
hypothesis: children praised for intelligence make more ability attributions for failures than children praised for effort
causal attributions: how people explain the causes of their successes and failures
can influence self-efficacy
most common: ability and effort
stable / unstable, controllable / uncontrollable, internal / external
achievement goals: focus on competence
performance-approach goals: demonstrating high competence to others
performance-avoidance goals: avoiding demonstrating low competence to self and others
learning / mastery goals: improving / increasing competence
praise for intelligence led to endorsement of performance goals
attributed low performance to low ability
sought out info about other childrens’ scores
misrepresented their scores
praise for effort led to endorsement of learning goals
attributed low performance to low effort
sought out info about other problems
didn’t distort performances
Pintrich: self-regulated learning
self-regulated learning
learners are viewed as active participants in the learning process
learners have the potential for control
individuals can set goals and adapt
students have to be taught to be self-regulated learners
should be part of a broad learning strategy
remind students to change up their learning strategies depending on task type
give feedback on strategies
tell students they’re capable of becoming self-regulated learners
epistemic beliefs: beliefs about knowledge
Zimmerman: self-regulated learning
metacognition: awareness of and knowledge about one’s own thinking
simply asking students to self-record some aspect of their learning often leads to “spontaneous” improvements in functioning (reactivity)
students’ metacognition awareness of particular aspects of their functioning could enhance their self-control
self-regulation: self-generated thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that are oriented to attaining goals
proactive in their efforts to learn because they
are aware of their strengths and limitations
are guided by personally set goals and task-related strategies
monitor their behavior in terms of their goals
self-reflect on their increasing effectiveness
enhances their self-satisfaction and motivation to learn
self-regulated students are more likely to
succeed academically
view their futures optimistically
the ability to self-regulate is a life-long skill
involves the self-motivation, self-awareness, and behavioral skill to implement learned knowledge appropriately
self-regulation involves the selective use of specific processes that must be personally adapted to each learning task
setting proximal goals for oneself
adopting powerful strategies for attaining the goals
monitoring one’s performance for signs of progress
managing time efficiently
self-evaluating one’s method
attributing causation to results
structure of self-regulatory processes
forethought: processes and beliefs that occur before efforts to learn
task analysis: goal setting and strategic planning
self-motivation: students’ beliefs about learning
self-efficacy: having the personal capability to learn
outcome expectations: personal consequences of learning
intrinsic interest: students’ valuing of the task skill for its own means
learning goal orientation: valuing the process of learning for its own merits
performance: processes that occur during behavioral implementation
self-control: deployment of specific methods / strategies that were selected during the forethought phase
ex: imagery, self-instruction, attention focusing, and task strategies
self-observation: self-recording personal events / self-experimentation to find out the course of these events
self-monitoring: covert form of self-experimentation. one’s cognitive tracking of personal functioning.
self-reflection: processes that occur after each learning effort
self-judgment
self-evaluation: comparisons of self-observed performances against some standard
causal attribution: beliefs about the cause of one’s errors / successes
self-reaction
feelings of self-satisfaction and positive affect regarding one’s performance
increases in self-satisfaction enhance motivation
adaptive reactions: adjustments designed to increase the effectiveness of one’s method of learning
defensive reactions: efforts to protect one’s self-image by withdrawing / avoiding opportunities to learn and perform
self-regulatory processes are teachable and can lead to increases in students’ motivation and achievement
few teachers effectively prepare students to do well on their own
Dweck: mindsets
mindset: the view you adopt for yourself
fixed mindset: believing that your qualities are carved in stone
growth mindset: belief that your basic qualities are things you can cultivate through your efforts, your strategies, and help from others
everyone can grow and change
recognize the value of challenging themselves and the importance of effort
with a fixed mindset: individuals fear challenge and devalue effort
Achievement Motivation
motivation explains why people vary in the effort they invest in tasks
we recognize motivation by observing behavior
choice of behavior / direction
eagerness to engage
effort and persistence
quality of cognitive engagement
hypothesis: children praised for intelligence make more ability attributions for failures than children praised for effort
causal attributions: how people explain the causes of their successes and failures
can influence self-efficacy
most common: ability and effort
stable / unstable, controllable / uncontrollable, internal / external
achievement goals: focus on competence
performance-approach goals: demonstrating high competence to others
performance-avoidance goals: avoiding demonstrating low competence to self and others
learning / mastery goals: improving / increasing competence
praise for intelligence led to endorsement of performance goals
attributed low performance to low ability
sought out info about other childrens’ scores
misrepresented their scores
praise for effort led to endorsement of learning goals
attributed low performance to low effort
sought out info about other problems
didn’t distort performances