1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
who were the psychologists?
Thibaut and Kelley
whats the main idea?
it is an economic theory of relationship
we maximise rewards and minimise the costs in a relationship
what are the 4 main concepts of this theory?
costs
reward
comparison levels
comparison level alternatives
rewards of a relationship
security
love
emotional support
trust
family
shared interests and hobbies
costs of a relationship
time consuming - less time with yourself
could end up badly - risk
could be a waste of time
could be a waste of money
conflict
opportunities lost
comparison level
the satisfaction level depends on previous experiences of relationships
if the current relationship is better than the past one, we are motivated to stay and vice versa
comparison level alternative
if the costs of the current relationship outweigh the rewards, then alternatives become more attractive
strengths - research support
Lawrence Kurdek
asked couples to complete questionnaires
measured relationship commitment and SET variables
found that partners who were most committed perceived the most rewards and fewer costs and viewed alternatives as relatively unattractive
therefore = as these findings match predictions from SET, strongly confirming the validity of the theory in both heterosexual and homosexual couples
limitations - claims that dissatisfaction only arises after a relationship stops being “profitable”
according to SET, thinking about costs in a relationship causes us to become dissatisfied
but Michael Argyle argues that we don’t monitor costs and rewards or consider alternatives when we are in a happy relationships
he states that dissatisfaction causes people to think about costs
therefore = this suggests that considering costs/alternatives is caused by dissatisfaction rather than the reverse
SET = thinking about costs — dissatisfaction
Michael Argyle = dissatisfaction — thinking about costs
limitation = vague concepts
rewards and costs are subjective
e.g. most people would consider “loyalty” to be a reward however some may consider it as a “cost” e.g. being in an abusive/obsessive relationship
it is also unclear what the values of Cl and ClAlt must be before dissatisfaction threatens a relationship
therefore = this means the theory is difficult to test in a valid and reliable way