happiness
happiness: implies an active or passive feeling of what one considers good
“dictionary definition”
Happiness (with a capital H): ultimate, complete, and total fulfillment
the human dilemma—consists of an assumption and two premises
assumption: everyone desires happiness.
Happiness must be attainable
Happiness is seemingly impossible to find
the way we respond to this moral dilemma reveals one’s moral vision
utilitarianism: affirming first premise and saying that people not acting like a utilitarian causes unhappiness
natural law: both premises of the dilemma are correct to a degree.
one can be reasonably happy in this life by choosing higher goods, but fuller happiness is attained later with supreme good
absurdism/nihilism: denies part 1 of the dilemma (happiness is not attainable)
epicureanism: deny part 2 of the dilemma, and hold that happiness is possible to find
hedonism: deny part 1 of the dilemma
escapism: rejects premise 2, to a degree
mortal relativism: one can affirm or deny either one of the dilemma premises, it’s up to the individual
“God, infinitely perfect and blessed in himself, in a plan of sheer goodness freely created man to make him share in his own blessed life.”
happiness is the natural end (purpose) of the human life (possession of the Good)
that’s why we all seek it; we were made for it!
Happiness is the final cause of all humans
argument from desire (C.S. Lewis)
all human desires have something to satisfy them (food = hunger)
humans have a desire for infinite happiness
choosing higher goods over lesser goods
creation is fundamentally good
evil comes from us rejecting higher goods for lesser ones
unhappiness is the natural result of this (not being in possession of the highest Good)
cut off from source of life = death
thankfully, this supreme good is not something impersonal or unknowable, but has a name and a face - Jesus Christ who reveals the Father’s love to us!
happiness: implies an active or passive feeling of what one considers good
“dictionary definition”
Happiness (with a capital H): ultimate, complete, and total fulfillment
the human dilemma—consists of an assumption and two premises
assumption: everyone desires happiness.
Happiness must be attainable
Happiness is seemingly impossible to find
the way we respond to this moral dilemma reveals one’s moral vision
utilitarianism: affirming first premise and saying that people not acting like a utilitarian causes unhappiness
natural law: both premises of the dilemma are correct to a degree.
one can be reasonably happy in this life by choosing higher goods, but fuller happiness is attained later with supreme good
absurdism/nihilism: denies part 1 of the dilemma (happiness is not attainable)
epicureanism: deny part 2 of the dilemma, and hold that happiness is possible to find
hedonism: deny part 1 of the dilemma
escapism: rejects premise 2, to a degree
mortal relativism: one can affirm or deny either one of the dilemma premises, it’s up to the individual
“God, infinitely perfect and blessed in himself, in a plan of sheer goodness freely created man to make him share in his own blessed life.”
happiness is the natural end (purpose) of the human life (possession of the Good)
that’s why we all seek it; we were made for it!
Happiness is the final cause of all humans
argument from desire (C.S. Lewis)
all human desires have something to satisfy them (food = hunger)
humans have a desire for infinite happiness
choosing higher goods over lesser goods
creation is fundamentally good
evil comes from us rejecting higher goods for lesser ones
unhappiness is the natural result of this (not being in possession of the highest Good)
cut off from source of life = death
thankfully, this supreme good is not something impersonal or unknowable, but has a name and a face - Jesus Christ who reveals the Father’s love to us!