happiness and the human dilemma
- happiness: implies an active or passive feeling of what one considers good
- Happiness (with a capital H): ultimate, complete, and total fulfillment
the human dilemma—consists of an assumption and two premises
- assumption: everyone desires happiness.
- Happiness must be attainable
- Happiness is seemingly impossible to find
- the way we respond to this moral dilemma reveals one’s moral vision
moral visions’ response to the human dilemma
- utilitarianism: affirming first premise and saying that people not acting like a utilitarian causes unhappiness
- natural law: both premises of the dilemma are correct to a degree.
- one can be reasonably happy in this life by choosing higher goods, but fuller happiness is attained later with supreme good
- absurdism/nihilism: denies part 1 of the dilemma (happiness is not attainable)
- epicureanism: deny part 2 of the dilemma, and hold that happiness is possible to find
- hedonism: deny part 1 of the dilemma
- escapism: rejects premise 2, to a degree
- mortal relativism: one can affirm or deny either one of the dilemma premises, it’s up to the individual
catholic moral thought
“God, infinitely perfect and blessed in himself, in a plan of sheer goodness freely created man to make him share in his own blessed life.”
- happiness is the natural end (purpose) of the human life (possession of the Good)
- that’s why we all seek it; we were made for it!
- Happiness is the final cause of all humans
argument from desire (C.S. Lewis)
- all human desires have something to satisfy them (food = hunger)
- humans have a desire for infinite happiness
choosing higher goods over lesser goods
- creation is fundamentally good
- evil comes from us rejecting higher goods for lesser ones
- unhappiness is the natural result of this (not being in possession of the highest Good)
- cut off from source of life = death
- thankfully, this supreme good is not something impersonal or unknowable, but has a name and a face - Jesus Christ who reveals the Father’s love to us!