happiness and the human dilemma
happiness: implies an active or passive feeling of what one considers good
Happiness (with a capital H): ultimate, complete, and total fulfillment
the human dilemma—consists of an assumption and two premises
Happiness must be attainable
Happiness is seemingly impossible to find
moral visions’ response to the human dilemma
utilitarianism: affirming first premise and saying that people not acting like a utilitarian causes unhappiness
natural law: both premises of the dilemma are correct to a degree.
absurdism/nihilism: denies part 1 of the dilemma (happiness is not attainable)
epicureanism: deny part 2 of the dilemma, and hold that happiness is possible to find
hedonism: deny part 1 of the dilemma
escapism: rejects premise 2, to a degree
mortal relativism: one can affirm or deny either one of the dilemma premises, it’s up to the individual
catholic moral thought
“God, infinitely perfect and blessed in himself, in a plan of sheer goodness freely created man to make him share in his own blessed life.”
argument from desire (C.S. Lewis)
all human desires have something to satisfy them (food = hunger)
humans have a desire for infinite happiness
choosing higher goods over lesser goods