1/21
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Practical application (SD and flooding)
Phobia Explanation (positive)
No cause (Davey 1922)
Phobia Explanation (negative)
Ethical issues
Phobia Explanation (negative)
No ethical issues
Systematic Desensitisation (positive)
In vivo is better (McGrath)
Systematic Desensitisation (positive)
Expensive
Systematic Desensitisation (negative)
Cost effective
Flooding (positive)
Ethical issues/traumatic
Flooding (negative)
Ineffective for some phobias
Flooding (negative)
Practical Application (March 2007)
Beck and Ellis’ Explanation of Depression (positive)
Doesn’t explain all aspects
Beck’s Explanation of Depression (negative)
Cognitive primacy
Beck and Ellis’ Explanation of Depression (negative)
Partial explanation
Ellis’ Explanation of Depression (negative)
CBT effectiveness (March 2007)
Treatment of Depression (positive)
Doesn’t treat serve cases
Treatment of Depression (negative)
Therapist-patient relationship (Rozenwig 1936)
Treatment of Depression (negative)
Research Support (Nestdat 2010)
Genetic Explanation of OCD (positive)
Environmental Evidence (Cromer 2007)
Genetic and Neural Explanation of OCD (negative)
Causality
Neural Explanation of OCD (negative)
Side effects
OCD Treatments (negative)
Cheap and non-disruptive
OCD Treatments (positive)
No biological cause so ineffective (Cromer 2007)
OCD Treatments (negative)