1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
social and political philosophy
deals with the role of the individual and government in society
what should the rights of the individual be?
how should governments function?
what is the best way for a society to function?
justice
the state, condition, or quality of being fair or free from bias / injustice
political philosophers are interested in:
the “ideal” society and what that looks like
social philosophers are interested in:
how the way a government and society is organized impacts the people within society
Martin Luther King jr
moral obligation to disobey unjust laws
believed non-violent protests were an effective way to bring about social change
letter from birmingham jail
“I have a dream”
fought against segregation
Kongfuzi (Confucius)
key points
the analects
the tao
virtue = the goal of human existence
generosity (ren), respect for tradition (li), right of conduct (yi)
propriety + good manners
more
leaders should study the classics + history
taught a curriculum full of music, history, literature, politics, and government to a generation of Chinese leaders
the state is responsible for the well-being of people
Plato
key
philosopher kings
person in power must have great skill and wisdom
3 roles: workers, soldiers, guardians
city-state is run by a group of wise, incorruptible governors
more
didn’t want family to exist as an institution - ppl should be raised based on intelligence and character instead
women should have the same rights as men
Aristotle
key
founder of political science
“man is a political animal” - best chance for happiness + security lies in a wise, just, organized political state
3 groups: monarchies, aristocracies, democracies
the rule of law = the foundation of political order
stressed the need for moderation and stability
more
rights of individual > power of a ruler
everything in nature moves towards a predetermined goal
humans can achieve a superior level of civilization if they live in a well-governed city-state
Thomas Aquinas
key
natural law
earthly laws should reflect the divine ideal of justice
obey god rather than men
if earthly laws violate natural law + are unjust, there is no need to obey them
more
human law should do more than reflect the whims and desires of those in power
Gandhi
key
convinced that the best way to achieve change is through non-violence
satyagraha = non-violent civil disobedience
liberation
the Dalai Lama
non-violence (stemming from Buddhism)
establishing peaceful relations > uprisings against occupying forces
Thomas Hobbes
key
leviathan
nothing justified rebellion against the state
unjust rule is better than the chaos that occurs when a central authority breaks down
power of the state must be absolute in order for peace, order, and stability
more
social contract: ppl surrendered natural rights in return for protection
in exchange for complete obedience, rulers guaranteed security, law, and order
John Locke
key
two treatises of government
duty of civil society is to enhance and protect natural rights
the will of the people (is where political power originated)
more
opposed absolute power in leaders
supported natural law
supported religious freedom, a propertied middle class, constitutional gov, and limitations on a monarch’s power
Edmund Burke
key
democracy leads to tyranny
traditional institutions (monarchy, aristocracy, established religion) are great
rights of community > individual
society is built on traditions handed down by previous gens
founder of modern conservatism
more
Reflections
very critical of radical change
change should happen slowly
Thomas Paine
key
the rights of man
monarchy, religion, and aristocracy hold back society + prevent progress
humans can change society for the better and start a more human, rational form of government once tradition and ignorance are swept away
the first champion of radical liberal democracy
more
liberal
social / political positions based on heredity are stupid
legal equality, universal public education, right to vote
inspired Canada
Mary Wollstonecraft
a vindication of the rights of women
attacked attitudes that encouraged women to be docile + only focus on looks
marriage = legalized prostitution
equal rights for women
education = key to social and political equality for women
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
the general will
radical new form of gov based on the will of all instead of the rich and powerful few
first philosopher of modern democracy
rulers should have society’s best interests at heart
paved the way for contemporary totalitarian govs and dictatorships
John Rawls
central arguments
citizens should enjoy as much freedom as possible in society as long as it does not infringe on the freedoms of others
economic inequality in soc should only occur if it raises the living standard of the poorest to a level greater than they would have through equal distribution
left wing
the veil of ignorance
by John Rawls
proposes that when u try to think of the most ideal, fair, and just society, you must also imagine being placed into that society without having any choice in your gender, ethnicity, genetics, physical and mental capabilities, and other factors
the more comfortable you feel entering a society as a “randomized” person, the more ideal that society is
argues that the world is full of natural inequalities
you could be anyone by no credit or fault of your own - the veil of ignorance puts this into perspective and encourages the nead to build greater equality
Robert Nozick
differed greatly from John Rawls
believed in less government control regarding economic and wealth distribution
a laissez-faire economic system (free market) is fair
right wing
Distributive justice
by Robert Nozick
a principle of justice in acquisition
if you are given smth, make smth, work to earn it, or come across smth that no one owns, you can own it jsutly
a principle of justice in transfer
if you make an exchange or transfer of jsutly acquired things with someone, that exchange or transfer is fair and just
a principle of rectification for injustice
instances where holdings are unfairly or unjustly taken need special considerations
e.g. taylor swift and lebron generate many sales at high prices from millions of customers - ppl willingly pay money - everyone is getting what they want
political libertarianism
a just society will allow its citizens to be maximally free
need-based justice
we have different needs so we get different things based on our needs
merit-based justice
justice = giving unequally based on what each person deserves
you get things based on what you do or contribute
people who do negative things face consequences and get less
negative right
the right not to be stopped or interfered from pursuing the things you need
can’t prevent someone from fulfilling their needs, but not obligated to help them fulfill them either
positive right
you’re entitled to get help fulfilling your needs if you can’t do it yourself
implies obligation
classical liberalism
Locke
Advocates freedom from excessive government interference
The function of the state is to protect the rights and liberties of individual people (which stem from natural law and God)
The individual takes precedence over the state
positive law
Created by humans
Written rules that are enforced by the courts of the land
Judges render verdicts and give reasons for their decisions
natural law
Unwritten law
Compels people to seek a higher, objective standard that can be used to judge positive laws
Supported by naturalists
Natural law = the law in its ideal form and the conscience of a state’s legal system
legal positivism
Legal positivists oppose natural law theory and reject the idea that there is a relationship between the law and moral right and wrong
Claim that moral truth cannot be known
Rules that have been enacted by governments or courts are the only sources of law
Any law passed by a legitimate authority must be obeyed by everyone, even those who consider the law morally wrong or unjust
legal naturalism
Hugo Grotius
People can arrive at just laws by using their ability to reason
Natural law can be inferred from human nature
Locke said natural law justifies people’s obedience to rulers in return for guarantees that their rights will be protected
Extreme: rules that conflict with natural law cannot be positive laws
Is valuable in that is provides a moral guide
Rules that diminish a person’s sense of dignity and equality violate natural law
retributive justice
ppl ought to get what they deserve
punishment should match the crime
e.g. if you kill someone you should die
distributive justice
ppl ought to share equally in the distribution of a society’s resources
merit as justice
Theory by Plato
People are naturally unequal and are better suited to some jobs than others, so human beings should behave and be treated according to their abilities, training, and knowledge
Everyone should do the kind of work that they are suited for, meaning that the state’s leaders, having acquired true knowledge of justice, would naturally rule the state justly
utility as justice
Hobbes, Locke, Bentham
Based on utilitarianism
Whatever advances the greatest number of people or whatever is socially useful is just
Individuals would find justice only in the context of the common good
fairness as justice
John Rawls
Justice based on fairness = a combo of principles of personal liberty and social equality
Justice is based on equality of both means and needs
A liberal society can retain its commitment to individualism while helping the disadvantaged gain more equitable access to the state’s resources
Each person is to have an equal right to the basic liberty similar to the liberty of others
Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage and attached to positions and offices open to all
entitlement as justice
Robert Nozick
Individual people are entitled to retain the fruits of their labor without government interference
All people should have the liberty to dispose of their possessions as they wish