1/9
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
what does qualitative analysis involve
purposeful observation of a skill performed live or recorded followed by judgement of quality of movement, allowing for feedback and strategies to improve performance.
non-numerical data collection
primary vs secondary data
primary
info & data collected firsthand by indiv. or group.
student own recording, self-reflection, coach observing
secondary
info & data collected by someone else used to inc. understanding & application of existing knowledge
videos of someone else
qualitative vs quantitative analysis
qualitative
collecting, analysing non-numerical data to understand and imp. movement concepts.
subjective
focuses on quality of movement
used for technique
quantitative
numerical and statistical data. collection, measurement and evaluation of data from movement skills.
objective
eg. heart rates
people who use qualitative movement analysis and why
people
Coaches, Biomechanists, Sports medical staff, Physical therapists, PE teachers
why
Analysing movements & skills, Modifying movement, Error detection & improvement, Talent identification, Player profiling/ranking, Identifying strengths, Injury prevention
1.PREPARATION STAGE
prerequisite knowledge of the skill/movement is researched and consideration is given to how, where and when to conduct the next stage (observation). Analyst plans, research & considers their actions to give performer advice and imp their quality of movement. They need to consider:
features of movement/skill
research on how skill is most effectively performed from biomechanical and physiological perspective. From elite performers using their performance as a template for comparison,
stage of learning & skill level
affects what info is provided - feedback, how skill is practiced. If cog stage - simple info, subroutines, ass-auto → more precise feedback
where skill is performed & viewed
closed env → performer control timing of skill consistently w/o distractions
observation methods
direct observation or digital recording
how info will be considered, evaluated, communicated
how is progress tracked, feedback to performer, use computer software or not, give improvements after viewing or recording or performance,
2.OBSERVATION STAGE + reliability definition
involves either live or recording of subject performing a skill/movement pattern. Implementing observation strats. Need to consider:
direct observation, note-taking. Adv & disadv
coach viewing skill/movement being performed, making reference to a checklist or rubric of how optimal movement is performed by the elite → makes data more objective
adv → immediate actions can be taken
disadv → subjective, cant show players how they performed, limited by memory
digital video recording, adv & disadv
use of devices to record movement
adv → easy access any time, data manipulated by AI
disadv → expensive some, often requires technical expertise to operate & understand data collected
continuous high-speed photography (burst photos)
good to observe actions that occur quickly that could be missed, shows how skill is sequenced and muscle groups
motion capture (mocap)
records body movements & creates 3d model of it → template. Shows skill execution and prevent injury from bad technique.
viewing position
need clear, uninterrupted view of performance
viewing plane
viewing side on, front on, overhead, behind the performer
viewing reliability.
no. times performance viewed in comp is limited by how frequently skill is performed, thus better observe in training (closed env) = more skill observed = reliable results.
reliability = able to be relied on but in this context → how often performance can be replicated consistently. More observations = inc. reliability and representative of how theyre performed on regular basis rather than anomaly one-offs.
3.EVALUATION STAGE + objective vs subjective, quality
involves judgements about the quality of movements. identifying strengths & weaknesses in technique, considering how improvements can be made. similarities & differences between performers movement/skill and that of an elite performer. Can be objective or subjective
objective → using checklists, rating scales, rubrics. Has greater consistency
subjective → opinion/interpretation of whats been observed
quality → extent skills/movements can be performed in a controlled & optimal way, high levels of performance.
checklists → inc. objectivity
need to consider:
strengths & weaknesses of performer
what might be causing problems
how can problems be addressed & improved
which areas need more imp & be prioritised
4.ERROR CORRECTION STAGE + intervention
involves implementing improvement strats to address weaknesses & errors in technique to imp. quality of movement/skills.
suggested mods should be practised:
closed env, distributed practice (esp cog learners), massed practice (ass/auto learner)
coaches can correct errors and imp. movement by:
discussing possible imp. strats w players
break skill into subroutines
demonstrate correct movement application
physically moving player body parts to exp. quality movement esp for cog learner.
intervention → implementing an action/program in an attempt to bring about improvements. consider:
regular feedback after each practice session
some movements are ingrained and hard to modify
POST ERROR CORRECTION/INTERVENTION EVALUATION
intervention evaluation→ Understanding what impact an intervention has had and to what extent improvements have been made relative to goals. primary data be collected again to evaluate the effectiveness of the ‘new’ technique.
collected under same conditions- post intervention
see to what extent intervention has achieved desired outcome and improved quality of movement.
what parts of strat has worked, do they need to be removed, reconsidered?
new set of strat is decided and practiced after before another QMA.
WORKED EXAMPLES - add next time you revisit (look at edrolo)