1/71
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what must be true IF (+)ACh was released through channels in cell membrane
changing DF on ACh by changing ACh concentration gradient should change quantal size (vesicle release)
changing DF on ACh by changing Vm should change quantal release
ACh release should cause a change in membrane current (as crosses the membrane thru channel)
evidence against transmitter release through presynaptic channels
when change in DF on ACh, mEPP amplitude stayed the same. Means no release through channels- and no change in quantal size/vesicle release
no membrane current is recorded
imaging evidence for vesicular release (stimulate presyn neuron, freeze tissue, electron micrograph image)
formation of omega profiles following motor neuron stimulation
no stimulation: normal vesicles
axon stimulation: omega profiles- depicts vesicles fusing with presynaptic membrane
shows NT release is quantal- each vesicle fusing out into cleft
from NMJ active zone shows
proteins embedded in presynaptic membrane- stereotypes through frog NMF active zone
for ex, N-type Ca2+ channels
freeze fracture experiments
imaging evidence for vesicular release- separates the 2 leaflets of lipid bilayer to look inside
process: chunk of synapse embedded in ice block. cut preparation, which will break at a weak spot. inside, bilayer is structurally weak. two leaflets will be split in 2. look inside lipid bilayer membrane
neuron at rest:
dots are the proteins that line the active zone (membrane has been cut)
neuron stimulated:
freeze right after stimulation shows indentation. vesicles in process of fusing with membrane (aka “pits”)
neuron 50ms post-stimulus:
no more pits because vesicles completely fused with membranes. rows of proteins back in order
how charges accumulate on a cell membrane
capacitor: structure that can separate charged particles (holds stores/charge)
capacitance measured in farads
capacitance of cell membrane is directly proportional to surface area of the cell (approx 1 uF/cm2)
larger cell, increased membrane, increased capacitance
capacitance increase with increased surface area
as synaptic vesicle fuses with membrane for release, surface area increases (as vesicle membrane becomes part of cell membrane) and increases capacitance
amperometry
measure of current
comes from release of NT when norepinephrine is released and undergoes a redox reaction
redox rxn produces carbon fiber, which can measure current and capacitance
capacitance as a measure of vesicle fusion
large chromaffin granules- large to increase cell size and increase capacitance for measurement
current is produced upon release of norepinephrine and carbon fiber reads it
between norE releases, capacitance jumps (increases)
release of transmitter causes
increase in capacitance
increase in current
evidence for vesicular release
capacitance as a measure of vesicle fusion
stimulate presynaptic neuron
causes simultaneous inward current of post synaptic neuron
presynaptic neuron increases capacitance (+ surface area) and at same time postsynaptic neuron produces EPSP
(same for mini EPPs- stimulate presynaptic neuron causes excitatory postsynaptic response)
by averaging several events of capacitance changes, a small change can be detected at nerve terminal following nerve stimulation
will find presynaptic stimulus capacitance increases- matches EPSP of mini
shows vesicular release, even for single release (mEPP)
overview process of synaptic vesicle fusion and exocytosis
synaptic vesicles —> docking —> priming —> calcium triggered fusion —> exocytosis
SNARE proteins that form CORE complex
3 SNARE proteins:
syntaxin, SNAP25, synaptobrevin/VAMP
syntaxin and SNAP25: associated with (on) plasma membrane
synaptobrevin/VMAP: vesicle associated (on) membrane protein
they dock the vesicle on the intracellular surface of the plasma membrane by connecting the alpha helices coils of each into a coiled core complex
vesicle docking- Munc-18 and SynPrInt site
several chaperone proteins bring synaptic vesicles to active zone
Munc-18 keeps syntaxin in folded configuration until vesicle ready to dock
SynPrInt site on Ca2+ channel binds to folded syntaxin and other CORE proteins, which allows Ca2+ channels to be closely associated with docked vesicles
normal synprint binding vs synprint peptides binding
normal: synprint site of voltage gated calcium channel binds folded syntaxin
synthesized SynPrInt peptide: matches the part of syntaxin that binds to calcium channel, so binds there and prevents syntaxin from binding
reduces release and abolishes synchronous release
vesicle priming
step in between vesicle docking and vesicles being ready for release
synaptic vesicle is docked to membrane and synaptotagmin (calcium sensor binding domain on vesicle- where calcium binds to vesicle) C2A and C2B bind to CORE complex (coiled core complex alpha helices)
complexin also binds at this step (forms complex between synaptotagmin and coiled complex)
calcium entry and vesicle fusion
calcium enters the cell and ions bind to synaptotagmin (C2A and C2B sites)
triggers vesicle fusion and release of transmitter into synapse
synaptotagmin, syntaxin, SNAP25, VAMP purpose
bring vesicle down to fuse with presynaptic membrane
synaptotagmin as calcium sensor for vesicle release
wild type synaptotagmin:
downwards peak = fast synchronous transmitter release (current very smooth and transmitter release at same time)
smaller peaks = asynchronous transmitter release
synaptotagmin-1 knockout
results in ONLY asynchronous release- tells us synaptotagmin-1 is necessary for synchronous vesicle release
C2B for vesicle release
wild type C2B
slope of 3.5 between number vesicles released and calcium concentration (about 4th order)
C2B mutation (decrease affinity to Ca2+)
still binds calcium but at decreased affinity- takes more calcium to cause same amount of vesicle release (slope 3.6)
C2B removal
calcium binding domain removed entirely, slope 1.6 means C2B crucial for 4th order relationship.
endocytosis and why
process of membrane being brought back into the nerve terminal
to regulate the increase in surface area during exocytosis
protein interactions for reverse of vesicle release
alphaSNAP: form around CORE complex
coats coiled complex and identifies bonds to be broken
NSF: ATPase untangles CORE proteins
ATPase hydrolyzes ATP for energy to undo coiled core complex
evidence that endocytosis and exocytosis occurs at same time
stimulate for 10Hz for 1 min
moderate level stimulation, lots of vesicle release, extent of active zone expanded, presence of endosomes (large vesicle of retrieved membrane) tells us endocytosis occured
stimulate for 10Hz for 15 min
almost out of vesicles, extant of active zone inc, takes on funky shape because cant retrieve membrane that quick, many more endosomes in terminal (proves endo and exo at same time)
which part of membrane needs to be retrieved
doesnt matter as long as you maintain size and shape
pH effect to check endocytosois
synaptopHluorin fluoresces as pH increases (less acidic)
it fluoresces at 7.2 (outside cell) but not at 5.5 (inside cell), so when in extracellular fluid, it fluuresces.
when it comes back into the cell (cell acidifies) so stops fluorescing
spH in mouse NMJ
few seconds after stimulation (15-30) bright fluorescence around axon terminals bc vesicle fusion
starts to fade at 60-75 seconds, bc the membrane that fused has now endcytosed and re-acidified, so fluoresncence goes away.
membrane being retreieved is SAME vesicle that was released
freeze fracture image significance and what it shows
coated pits- membrane in the process of being endocytosed.
coated in protein, to say that is the membrane that needs to be retrieved.
coated pits are NOT in the active zone- endocytosis occurs away from active zone where exocytosis occurs (cant do at same place)
3 methods for recycling vesicle membranes
kiss-and-run (at synapses that arent very active)
clathrin-mediated (most common
these 2 wont occur at same synapse
bulk (occurs, but not clear physiologically)
clathrin-mediated endocytoses
AP2 (adapter protein 2) interacts with Ca2+ bound synaptotagmin
perfect marker for what type of membrane to bring back (bc that vesicle was j fused out)
clathrin binds to AP2 to endocytose membrane
PIP2: essential for clathrin to work properly (exact mech unclear)
clathrin molecules join together into triskelion complex and form spherical complex
pulls part of membrane to bring back into the cell
clathrin mediated endocytoses coating of pits
AP2 binds to synaptotagmin and tugs on membrane
clathrin binds to AP2 and tugs in membrane to bring it in
dynamin pinches end of membrane to form a vesicle —> coated vesicle
uncoating as ca2+ undbinds to synatoptagmin and dissociates
vesicle pinching by dynamin
dynamin molecules form cluster where pinching off will occur: 2 paths
GTP hydrolysis: allows separation to actually happen
GTP-gammaS: allows GTP to do its activity, but prevents hydrolysis so separation never occurs and dynmin accumulates into “tower”
bulk endocytosis transmitter release
can occur if massive amounts of vesicle release
syndapin proteins bind to membrane and pull in a big piece of membrane —> forms endosome
endosome breaks off into pieces forming synaptic vesicles (in active zone)
kiss-and-run transmitter release hypothesis
occurs at less active synapses
docking complexes are holding vesicle to membane, the vesicle starts to fuse “kisses” the membrane, releases some NT, then goes back into terminal
doesnt release all its NTs
3 parts of vesicle pools
ready pool
docked vesicles with coiled core complex holding it to membrane. ready for release (after priming and Ca2+)
recycling pool
vesicles that have been endocytosed and are empty. need to be filled with NT, have no CORE proteins, but once added can be part of ready pool
no synapsin, so not tethered to cytoskeleton
reserve pool
vesicles in reserve (backuops) that aren’t ready to be release but also weren’t just recycled
are tethered to cytoskeleton bc synapsin
synapsin phosphorylation
synapsin dephosoprylation
caused by decreased calcium, increases tethering, more vesicles in reserve pool than recycle
synapsin phosphorylation
caused by increased calcium, decreases tethering, more vesicles in recycle pool than reserve
botulinum and tetanus toxin targets
cleaves proteins of core coiled complex (synaptobrevin/vamp), prevents complex from forming, prevents docking and transmitter release
selective entry of botulinum toxins into nerve terminal
during endocytosis, there are both heavy and light chains
heavy chain internalizes into the cell'
light chain gets into cytoplasm and cleaves SNARE proteins
paralyzes, so no more release of NT/movement
ionotropic channel
ligand-gated channel
ionotropic channel characteristics
rapid onset of effects (channel opening is fast reception)
rapid termination of effects
1:1 relationship between action and response (1 binding : 1 action)
effects limited by type of ion channel (only cl- ions pass through cl- channel)
binds larger (uM) concentration bc located near site of NT release (in active zone)
—> lower affinity
metabotropic
g-protein-coupled receptor
not an ion channel
metabotropic receptors
slow onset of effects (bc series of processes)
slow termination (all processes need to inactivate)
greater than 1:1 response
multiple diverse effects from single NT due to multitude of second messenger signaling pathways
usually bind NT in nM range (smaller concentration) bc located far from site of NT release
higher affinity
families of ionotropic receptors has to do with
structure
families:
pentameric (cys-loop) receptor
glutamate receptor
trimeric receptor
TRP receptor
pentameric (cys-loop) receptor
pentamer, 5 subunits, 4 transmem segments
nAChRs, seratonin, GABAa, glycine, ZAC
glutamate receptor
tetramer, 4 subunits, 4 (including one small) transmembrane seg
NMDA, AMPA, kainate
trimeric receptor
trimer, 3 subunits, 2 transmem seg
ATP, ASIC
TRP receptor
tetramer (but diff fam from glutamate), 4 subunits, 6 transmem, 1 p-loop
TRP receptors
ACh receptor basics
binds ACh extracellularly, stingrays are good source of ACh
nAChR subunits
gray circile subunit (5), with 4 transmembrane seg, M1-4 segments
M4 segment closest to core and pore lining so determines ion selectivity
pentameric family (AChR)
ACh binds to alpha subunits + receptor needs 2 ACh to bind, so each ACh receptor has at least 2 alpha subunits
combinations of neuronal nAChR subunits
homomeric
5 identical subunits (alpha 7 or alpha 9)
heteromeric
the 5 subunits may be diff, as long as each has 2 alpha subunits
ligand binding
probabilistic, so binding frequency increases with concentration of ligand
amount of time ligand spends bound to receptor varies by ligand (KD)
what binds to ACh receptors
ACh binds all ACh receptors
nicotine binds only ionotropic ACh receptors aka nAChR
dissociation constant KD
strength of binding affinity
Koff / Kon
concentration at which 50% binding sites are occupied
higher KD means lower affinity
using graph to find KD and affinity
find affinity for nAChRs in neurons vs muscle
look at 50% receptors occupied on y-axis
KD for nAChRs in neurons req lower concentration ACh —> higher affinity
KD for nAChRs in muscle req higher concentratuon ACh —> lower affinity
ligand agonists
compound that elicits same biological effects as the endogenous (naturally occuring) ligand when it binds to receptor
nicotine or ACh: Vm will be same when agonist nictone is used bc has same effect as when ACh used
ligand antagonists
compound that reduces or eliminates effect of an agonist when bound to receptor
tubocurarine or alpha bungarotoxin
reduces of abolishes Vm response
competitive antagonist
binds to same site as agonist (orthosteric binding) but does not activate the receptor
reduces or prevents activation of receptor by an agonist
non-competitive antagonist
binds to the receptor at a different site from an agonist (allosteric) but prevents or reduces activation of the receptor
NAM: negative allosteric modulatpr
reversible antagonist
binds non-covalently to the receptor, so can come off by “washing off”
tubocurarine
irreversible antagonist
binds covalently to the receptor, so cannot be displayed by either competing ligands of “washing off”
alpha bungarotoxin
GABA receptors
inhibitory but still in pentameric family
GABA B: metabotropic
GABA A: ionotropic and pentameric family
are ligand gated chloride channels
equilibrium potential of GABA receptor is same as that of chloride
effects of GABA A receptors: hyperpolarizing inhibition
DF on GABA receptors determined by ECl
DF gaba = Vm = Ecl
chloride current (~ -70mV) will always move membrane potential towards its equiibrium
VM -40 to -50 is hyperpolarizing (bc cl- coming into the cell)
VM -80 is depolarizing, but is still inhibitory because can only depolarize to at most -70, which is hyperpolarized compared to AP threshold
effects of GABA A receptors: shunting inhibition
gaba receptors not activated:
normal AChR release (excitatory, depolarizing)
gaba receptors activated:
AChR will cause decreased excitatory response because of decreased membrane resistance/ increased conductance which reduces voltage (V=IR)
gaba receptor effect when Vm = Ecl
inhibitory, even when no net current
inhibition with ion channels
IPSPs generation when ion channels are opened causing hyperpolarization of membrane ??
open gaba receptors reduces excitatory effects —> inhibitory effect
ACh released at distal dendrite
EPSP, decays with distance towards soma, depolarizes cell more tha Ecl, so Cl enters the cell to bring back to -70
glutamate also tries to depolarize, but has less of an effect with GABA receptor being open
ACh released close to soma
inhibitory synapse closer to soma, so inwards movement will decrease response by more?
glycine receptors (GlyRs)
inhibitory ionotropic receptor in pentameric family
glycine vs GABA current
glycine is faster to activate and desensitize?
ionotropic glutamate receptor structure
tetramers- 4 subunits, has large extracellular regions
includes NMDA and AMPA
2 extracellular domains
first: ligand binding domain where cofactors bind
farthest: amino terminal domain- site of modulation for glutamate receptors’ functioning
NMDA vs Non NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptors
Non-NMDA (AMPA and kainate)
low conductance, fast gating and densitization, permeable to Na+/Ka+ and sometimes Ca2+, not subject to Mg block
faster neurotransmission due to AMPA receptors
NMDA
high conductance, slow gating speed and desensitization, permeable to Na+/K+/Ca2+, subject to Mg block
requires both glycine (plentiful) and glutamate to bind to activate
excitatory post synaptic response inwards current due to Ca2+ influx
Mg2+ block of NMDA glutamate receptors
at resting potential, NMDA receptors are blocked by Mg2+
Mg2+ gets pushed out when cell gets depolarized (excitatory input)
second glutamate binds to NMDA receptor which opens channel and passes current
NMDA receptors essential for
Ca2+ influx
NMDA receptor only passes current when
presynaptically: glutamate release
postsynaptically: depolarization
IV plot for NMDA receptor
linear without Mg (similar to AChR iv plot)
with Mg: little to no current until enough depolarization to remove Mg block