risorgiento
italian nationalist movement led by Camilo di Cavoir
camilo di cavoir
PM of Piedmont-Sardinia
wanted initially to unite N. and Cen. Italy
modernized P-S
forms secret alliance w/farnce and Nap. III
Zolferine
created econ. profits and unity
poverty and unemp. = DOWN
cities and factories = UP
Prussian interest in unification
Prussia is interested in unification b/c their influence is down
Reichstag making it diff to do anything
bismarck
begins as prussian nationalist and suspicious of modern ideas
flexible opportunist (real politik)
GOALS: build up prussia’s strength and influence in Europe
Bismarck’s plan to unite austira
use german nationalism to remove austria from German affairs and take the lead in unification under prussia
The Constitutional Struggle
Bismarck knew the army needed to be beefed up
liberals protest, but bismarck says its necessary
Prussia VS Denmark (1/3)
stirs up german nationalism and boosts prussian morale
Bismarck gets the austrians to get w/Prussia in joint administration (building tensions)
Austria VS Prussia (2/3)
Bismarck wants a quick, localized defeat
Prussia wins shortly
RESULT: all german states NORTH of Mayan River = consolidated in the Northern German Confederation under wilhelm I as pres.
allow UNIV MALE SUFFRAGE
Franco-Prussian War
Bismarck realizes he needs to beat france to get S. Ger. states
prussians crush france w/fairly short war
Treaty of Frankfurt
southern german states agreed to join the new German empire
2 distinct approaches to Russia in late 19th/early 20th cen
Westernizers - want russia to adopt Western ways
slaviphiles - russia has its own special desitny as the leading Slavic power
RESULT OF 2 Conflicts = tension within the russian govt
Czar Alexander II
liberalish fan of reform to a DEGREE
knows serfdom must go and that russia is poor and needs industrializing
intelligencia
educated indiv. w/ideas that criticized the gov’t and debated in russia
over-exaggerated sense of self
believed intellectuals should have a large role in soxiety and exag. the impact groups like them had
The Crimean War
Alexander II comes to power during this war
huge wake up call for the gov’t and military
suffered huge defeats
russia gov’t sees the need to westernize for the sake of military power
Serfdom under Alexander II
wanted to abolish serfdom w/o creating a class of landless peasants
result: est. a plan w/the Boyars (1/2 land on estates = purchased by newly freed serfs)
peasants can’t afford
way of life for peasants doesn’t change that much but serfdom is gone
local gov’t reforms under Alexander II
alexander est. local gov’t units w/diff districts being overseen by councils (Zemstvos)
elected by townspeopel and dealt w/local issues
legal reforms under alexander II
independent judicial system and created official set of courts; est. due process provisions but intelligencia = unsatisfied
Where do marxist theories not apply?
russia b/c it is not industrialized
peasant socialism
derivation of socialism
alexander Herzen - leading proponent that believed revolution would come from Rus. Peasantry
Reactionary crackdown following Alexander II assassination
brutal repression of all reformers/liberals in russia, but existing reforms are maintained
russification
the forcible assimilation of non-russians
spearheaded by the church
1890 industrialization in Russia
Ct. Sergei Witte (knew russia needed to modernize)
gov’t built large amt of railroads
protective tariffs and put russia on gold standard
western investment
working class conditions = atrocious
Russia VS Japan in late 19th/early 20th cen
japan = on the rise as a power in East asia that was westernizing
japanese destroy the russians
The Revolution of 1905 (russia)
b/c of industrialization/modernization in Russia, intelligencia wanted a say (a constitutional monarchy)
workers (societs) - want workers councils; marxist; organized illegally
army is fighting the Japanese, so there’s no battle initially until Bloody Sunday
bloody sunday
workers march to Czar’s winter palace and are killed by troops
result: Czar grants October Manifest
what did every nation operate under in late 19th/early 20th century?
nation state
2 themes of euro nations in late 19th/early 20th cen
mass politics (getting more ppl. involved; univ male suffrage; women want vote)
growing mass loyalty to the nation (pol. parties compete for the votes of ordinary ppl)
gov’ts seem more worthy of respect, but politicians can now utilize this to distract from domestic problems
Cultural Struggle (germany)
bismarck going after the Catholic Church b/c they made concerning declarations against him
largely a failure → 1878 bismarck gives up
Result: bismarck + church work together and enact high tariffs
Bismarck’s social reforms
1st comprehensive social welfare program
1st social security laws
nat’l sickness and accident insurance laws
system of retirement benefits
ENACTED TO STEAL SOCIALISTS’ THUNDER
Dropping of the Pilot
William II becomes Kaiser and fires Bismarck
Result: Bismarck’s complex BOP system falls apart
paris commune
working classes in Paris want to rule Paris w/o the rule of the Third Rep after the Franco-Prussian War
nat’l assembly + prussia help to crush the Paris Commune
Result: national unity = UP
what political system does france adopt post franco-prussian war? (in third rep)
multiparty system
no one party can win
Result: must form coalitions btwn parties
crises faced by the third republic
boulangere crisis (boulangere tries to stage a coup)
panama sandal (corruption and bribery at the canal construction attempt in panama)
DREYFUS AFFAIR (first jewish man appointed to aid French Gen Staff
convicted of treason and monarchists, church, and anti-semetics use against france
Reform bill of 1867
re-appointment and broadening of suffrage (all mid. class + the upper working class)
great britain
Reform bill of 1884
univ adult male suffrage in GB
gladstone’s liberal reforms as lib. party leader in GB
The Ballot Act of 1872 (secret ballot)
The Civil Services Reform Act (competitive exams for gov’t jobs)
The Education Act (public schools)
The Land Act (tried to help ireland but failed)
The University Act (no more religious tests for education)
the parliament act of 1911
strips house of lords of their power in GB b/c they tried to reassert themselves and block reforms
The People’s Budget
David Lloyd George’s proposal for lots of social welfare laws
raised taxes on the rich to pay
makes a deal w/Irish nationalists in the House of Commons if they support the ppl’s budge
the dual monarchy
term for the new Austria-Hungary after Prussia defeats austria in war and Hungarians rise up
Hungary gets indep. (virtually) and the Magyars can deal w/other ethnic groups
the language ordinances
est. legal equality btwn german language and local languages
Result: ethnic germans backlash + anti-semitism
the 2nd internationale
loose association of socialist parties
psychologically unifying
met every 3 yrs to discuss Marx’s doctrine
gradualism
what more parties in euro were shifting towards
combine militant rhetoric w/moderate action
b/c of growth of unions and revisionist marxism
why was there a decline of radical socialism?
workers were less inclined to follow radical programs
wanted tangible benefits
there was not a united pol./soc. group
living conditions had improved
purchasing power was UP
growth of labor unions
new model unions
avoided radicalism and strikes
only involved skilled workers
focused on increasing wages, decreasing hours, and increasing working conditions
more practical approach
revisionist marxism
response to the moderate-trend
socialists adopted tactics and combined w/other groups to make gradual evolutionary gains through legislation and collective bargaining
new imperialism
change in the imperialistic behavior in euro. countries from 1880-1914
characterized by the founding of vast political empires and est. colonies
colonies = new emphasis
causes of new imperialism
economic
need new markets and raw materials
needed place to invest
short run: colones = NOT profitable
political/diplomatic
strategic points
nationalism - colonies = essential to great nations
social darwinism - racist competitions
social tensions/conflicts in Euro
conservative powers say colonial issues = divert attention from dom. issues
the white man’s burden
coined by Kipling
it is the white man’s duty to save the non-white ppl of the world and civilize them
consequences of new imperialism
increased tensions btwn european states
wars w/non-europeans (esp. in africa and asia)
boer wars
GB conquered dutch settlers in south africa
the berlin conference
est. that euro. claims in africa had to rest on effective occupation
made belgium ruler of neutral congo free-state
agreed to end slavery
coincides w/germany’s emergence as an imperial power
result: german imperial holdings are scattered
J. A. Hobbson
says imperialism = a result of unregulated capitalism and thus only paid off for by specific groups and not the euro. country as a whole
said it took attention away from domestic needs
Joseph Conrad and “Heart of Darkness”
portrayed the selfishness and hypocracy of Euro enslaving and conquering other/african ppls
the eastern question
“what will happen to the eastern region as the ottoman empire falls?”
russia and aus-hun want most
could lead to conflict
Result: series of balkan crises (starting 1870s)
panslavism
russia = the protector of all slavic ppls
the treaty of san-stefano
russia forces ottoman empire to agree and if implemented, the russians would = dom. power in the balkans
bismarck intervenes w/congress of berlin
Treaty of Berlin
stops the san-stefano treaty
romania, montenego, serbia = independent
bulgaria → autonomy wihtin Ott. empire
Aus-hun acquires bosnia herzegovina
russia = greatest loser and blames bismarck
causes of ww1: 2 hostile alliance blocks
GB, france, russia VS germany, aus hun, and italy
b/c of the dropping of the pilot and the disrupted BOP
causes of ww1: militarism
euro. powers see force as a desirable method of problem solving
arms race w/navies btwn GB and Germany
causes of ww1: imperialism
conflict over colonies in asia and africa
moroccan crisis - William II of germany says he will back moroccan independence even though tech. mor. = part of ottoman empire w/french sphere of influence
agadir crisis - series of outbreaks in morocco that lead france to send troops
causes of ww1: nationalism
especially in the balkans
bosnia herz. has a large serbian population that want to join serbia and leave aus-hun
serbian terrorist groups causing ww1
bosnian serbs that wanted to join serbia engage in terror campaign against aus hun in bosnia
franz ferdinand is killed by terrorist group w/connections to serbian gov’t
aus-hun gives serbia ultimatum
aus hun declares war on serbia
schlieffen plan
germany’s plan for a 2-front war
with war on east starting, germany goes and attacks neutral belgium
allied powers
russia, france, gb
central powers
aus-hun, germany, and ottoman empire (initially)
1st battle of the Marne
the french fight back against the germans and war on the western front bogs down in to trench warfare and stalemate
how did the eastern front differ from the western front in ww1?
while western front = stalemate, the eastern front never bogs down and has many new entries
planned economies
economy in shambles b/c of war
countries adopt total war policy (have to enter emergency economic mode)
skilled workers are exempt from the draft
unions get increased prestige and co-op with the gov’t for both sides
unemployment goes down and wages go up
women during ww1
women entered the workforce or shifted to war related jobs
changed perspectives on women’s capabilities
women get equal pay DURING THE WAR
the march revolution
violent street demonstrations broke out in Petrograd
Czar is down w/army, but army turns to the ppl
duma returns to declare a provisional gov’t
why did the duma fail to get a hold of russia following czarist failures?
critical mistake: failed to take russia out of the war
petrigrad soviet
council of workers and soldiers’ deputies modeled on the societ councils from 1905
made up of workers, educated, socialists, and soldiers
saw itself as a product of revolutionary democracy
Army Order #1
petrigrad soviet stripped officers of their authority in the army and placed power in the hands of elected committees of ordinary soldiers
result: complete collapse of dsicipline in the army
marxist ideology on the rise in Russia (late 19th cen)
1890s - marxism becomes relevant in russia
younger revolutionaries begin to shift to marxism (such as lenin, trotsky, and stalin)
form the social democrats group
believe that revolution will be international in origin and begin in Western Eur. b/c the russians must fully adopt capitalism first
bolsheviks
dominated by lenin
strong authority at the top with sole authority
any co-operation w/other liberal/radical groups is only temporary
revolution will not start as an uprising of the MASSES, but will instead be brought on by a small group of PROFESSIONAL revolutionaries
mensheviks
dominated by spontaneous mass uprising of the workers
lenin’s three central concepts
only a violent revolution will overthrow capitalism
a communist revolution was possible in highly agricultural countries
possibility of a revolution determined by human leadership
called for a highly disciplined workers’ party controlled by a small elite group of intellectuals
bolshevik seizure of power
initiated by lenin’s right hand man → trotsky
propogandized and said there were counter-rev. plots so the petregard soviet insititute him as the leader of a special military rev. committee
result: soviet military power = in bolshevik’s hands
3 reasons the bolsheviks were able to come to power
democracy had dissolved into anarchy by 1917
lenin and trotsky = completely ruthless; determined; effective leadership
bolshevik policies appeal to regular russians (peace, land, and bread)
treaty of brestlituvsk (?? spelling)
russia gives up 1/3 of population to germany by losing ukraine, latvia, lithuania, estonia, E. poland, and finland
result: russia = out of war and Lenin can pursue absolute bolshevik power
russian civil war
two sides = the whites (non bolsheviks) and the reds (bolsheviks)
the whites’ problem: no unity b/c the whites = united by hatred for the reds and nothing else
comes to end in early 1920s - 1-party dictatorship being established
lenin’s war communism
bolshevik control of the economy to mobilize the econ. for civil war
red terror
lenin est. a secret police organization to execute anyone not in support of the bolsheviks
weimer republic
moderate socialists in the German parliament declare a republic after the Kaiser abdicated in 1918
how did the reasons for fighting ww1 shift throughout the war?
initially a war abt national interests, but had shifted to be abt idealistic principles
wilson’s peace aims at versailles
tried to shift discussion of war aims to the higher level w/wilson’s 14 points
believed his deals justified the war
proposals = open diplomacy, arms reduction, and the self determination of people
general association of nations that would guarantee pol. indep. to all states (The league of nations)
david lloyd george’s aims at versailles
had promised GB that he would get back at germany if he won but wasn’t passionate about it
wants germany to pay, but not nearly as much as france
wants a moderate peace and to avoid another war
british PUBLIC want a harsh peace
Clemenceau’s aims at versailles
wants security for france against germany
wants a rhineland buffer state
wants reparations from germany
HUGE requests in reparations
the treaty of versailles
NOTE: Not a negotiated treaty w/germany; imposed onto them
main provisions of the treaty
germany’s military is reduced
germany is blamed for the war w/ the War Guilt Clause
reparations set at $33 bill. USD
rhineland is demilitarized but stays ger. territory
aus-hun dismantled
new nations are created (eastern)
leadue of nations’ mandates established
2 major issues w/peace settlement after ww1
weimar republic doesn’t have the widespread support of the german public
USA - senate doesn’t approve of wilson’s compromises
Wilson emphasizes the league of nations but doesn’t join b/c senate doesn’t approve