1/42
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
1st Amendment
“Congress shall make no law” abridging freedom of speech → Absolutism → No rights are absolute
Community vs. individual rights → COVID vaccines
Sedition: speaking ill of the government
Eugene V. Debs
Debs spoke out against the war (He was a socialist)
Was the judge acting on reason or fear when he convicted Debs under the Sedition Act?
Xenophobia
Schenck v. U.S.
Schenck passed out flyers telling people not to register for the draft
United States won - Schenck was convicted of violating the Espionage Act
The Supreme Court held that this established a clear and present danger (like falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater)
Established that the 1st Amendment is limited and does not protect speech that creates a clear and present danger
Abrams v. U.S.
Congress determined that propaganda pamphlets (leaflets that spoke against war material production) posed a clear and present danger to the war effort
Dissenting opinion → Free speech should not be limited because it will prevent the marketplace of ideas (only good ideas will rise to the top and be accepted by society)
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Klansmen wanted to overthrow government and gave orders to kill groups of people (this was protected speech!)
Best thing to do to handle speech is counter it with more speech
Imminent and Likely Lawless Action (replaces clear and present danger test) → makes it difficult to attach speech to actions (expands free
Gerrymandering
Purpose: to create non-competitive elections
Only illegal to gerrymander based on race
Realignment
Group of democrats votes republican (or vice versa) because of a certain candidate
N.Y. Times v. U.S. (Pentagon Papers Case)
During Vietnam War
Pentagon papers were leaked and revealed things that were embarrassing to government that the American people were lied to
Government had been giving people false hope
Ellsburg photocopied every page and gave them to the NY Times to publish
Prior Restraint: Government stopped the rest of the story from being published
Comes with a “heavy presumption against its constitutional validity”, and the government failed to reach this, which is why they couldn’t stop the publication of the Pentagon Papers
NY Times won
Court ruled that the government could not stop the press from publishing unless there’s “direct and immediate harm” to national security
There was no direct and immediate harm because the papers were published years before
The War in Iraq
Fought under false pretenses and misconceptions
President (Bush) → CIA Director (chosen by the President) → Agents who did believe the curveball story/Agents who didn’t believe the curveball story
Beat Reporter was Judith Miller in this case
The story that spoke against the curveball story was on the 6th page of the Washington Post (so no one saw it!!)
Those who did believe the curveball story thought that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction
Which is where the Judith Miller got her sources and published them in the NY Times (which is liberal because of the editorial board → but the front page is always fact)
24 Hour news cycle
Finding stories just to fill the time
Media blends political news and information with entertainment
Narrowcasting
Only publishing certain information to target a certain audience
Ex. FOX narrowcasts to conservatives
Ex. ESPN narrowcasts to sports fans
The Echo Chamber
Confirmation bias
People see media confirming their pre-existing political beliefs
Causes polarization
Slander vs. Libel (both illegal)
Slander → spoken false information that could ruin someone’s reputation
Libel → (think “letters”) written false information that could ruin someone’s reputation
For both, it must be proven that the person who did these did it knowing the information was false
Linkage Institutions
Connect the people to the government
Elections, political parties, interest groups, and the media
Political activists/policy entrepreneurs/whistle blowers try to change policy; they are dependent on the media to get their ideas out
FCC Act of 1934
Established the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to regulate communications by radio, satellite, and cable
FCC Public Interest Clause: Congress stipulates that in order to receive a broadcast license, a station must serve the public interest
Needed because there are a limited number of broadcast slots/stations on radios and TVs
FCC - “decency police”
Public/broadcast media can not use vulgarity or indecency
All expression can be limited by time, place, and manner
1941 Media Ownership Rules
Meant to ensure a “marketplace of ideas” by preventing one media company from owning too many outlets (preventing media monopolies) and creating more competition
1996 Telecommunications Act
Government deregulation of the media industry by removing ownership limits and boundaries
Relaxed the 1941 rules and led to the creation of megamedia
Megamedia
Oligopoly → 5 companies in control
Free Trade
No tariffs on trading
Would create less blue-collar jobs and more white-collar jobs (creative destruction)
Globalization: Free trade around the world
Talking Point
Something a politician says over and over to get people to believe it
Essentially propaganda
Outsourcing
Moving U.S. jobs outside of the U.S. as to not pay the workers as much
N.Y. Times v. Sullivan
For a public official to win a libel suit, they must prove that the statement was made with “actual malice” (if they knew that what they were saying wasn’t true)
Hustler Magazine v. Farwell
The First Amendment protects parody and satirity directed at public figures even if the content is offensive
Shield Laws
Statutes that protect journalists from being legally forced to reveal their confidential sources or unpublished information in court
Comes from Branzburg v. Hayes ruling
Branzburg was a reporter who refused to testify and disclose the identity of confidential resources in a trial involving drug crimesThe Supreme Court (Justice White) ruled that if there exists a “compelling and paramount interest”, the reporter cannot withhold information (a confidential source)
No federal shield laws exist
Provisions vary from state to state, but most states have a shield law
Net Neutrality vs. Net Competition
Net Neutrality: Internet Service Providers (ISPs) must treat all data equally without blocking or prioritizing certain content
No fast and slow lanes (equal access)
Gives the federal government more power
Net Competition: Broader market forces that are argued to prevent ISPs from engaging in anti-competitive practices
Fast and slow lanes create media that people have to pay for to have access to
How the media is now
Prevents marketplace of ideas
Broadcast Media
TV, radio, and other electronics
Print Media
Newspapers, magazines, and journals
Media Event
Staged event for the media to generate public attention
Political theater: the idea that politicians use postering and gestures to project an image and compete for power
Sound Bites
Amount of time per minute given for air time
Shrinks over time
Used by the media to convey political messages
“Talking Heads”
Visual shot of a politician speaking to a camera
Trial Balloon
Tactic used by politicians or government officials to discreetly release information about public policy through the media to test public reaction
“Horse Race” Journalism
Type of election coverage that focuses on which candidate is winning or losing instead of their policies or qualifications
Tracking only the polls
Policy Entrepreneur
Advocates for specific policy change
Gatekeeper role of the media
The media controls which information reaches the public and for how long, so they influence which issues become national political topics
Agenda setting role of the media
The media influences the public’s perception of the importance of issues by choosing which stories to cover
4th Estate
The media acts as another branch of government and a check on the other branches
Watchdog role, investigative journaling, Woodward and Bernstein (exposed Watergate corruption)
2003 FCC Rules on Media Ownership
Michael Powell (approved mergers because internet still had marketplace of ideas) approved rule changes within the FCC that eased restrictions on media ownership
Hard News
Factual reporting of serious events and issues
Beat Reporting
Reporter is assigned to cover a specific topic of issue as to become experts
Fairness Doctrine/Equal Time Rule/Right of Reply Rule
Fairness Doctrine: Old FCC policy (does not still apply today) requiring broadcasters to cover controversial issues fairly
Equal Time Rule: Each political candidate should have equal air time
Right of Reply Rule: Gives individuals the right to respond to attacks made against them on air
1992 Election vs. 2000 Election (regarding the media)
1992 Election: Network news coverage = 8 minutes per night (CBS, NBC, ABC) out of their 22 minute airing from 6:30-7
2000 Election: Network news coverage = 4 minutes per night
Other 4 minutes went to more entertaining subjects rather than illuminating subjects
Clientelism
American government wants American companies to succeed
Ex. FCC lets companies merge because they will profit from it