1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
descartes dualism
there are two fundamental substances: mind and body, and they have essential properties and modal properties
mind
has the essential property of thought, are thinking things, thought takes on different modes
body
has the essential property of extension or volume, extended things that occupy space
understand, doubt, affirm, deny, will, refuse, imagine, sense
modal properties of mind
size, shape, duration, location
modal properties of body
role of the senses
can deceive us, not completely reliable, provide us with info about the world but do not give us certain knowledge
property dualism
there is only substance with two fundamental properties, physical and mental (consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe)
zombie argument
a physical duplicate of something can have all the same physical properties, but none of the same mental properties - only necessary truths would exist in a duplicate
easy problem (consciousness)
explaining how the brain processes information, generates behavior, and supports functions like memory and decision-making
hard problem (consciousness)
asks why human behaviors are accompanied by subjective experience, consciousness can’t be explained in only physical terms or broken down through reductionism
qualia (phenomenal properties of consciousness)
the subjective aspects of conscious experience, what it feels like to have an experience versus just knowing the physical aspects of it (do not have physical explanations)
panpsychism
consciousness is universal and exists in all things to some degree
stoic pantheism
the universe is made up of a single physical reality that is ordered by the principle of logos
double-aspect theory (spinoza)
reality is made of a single substance that has two attributes, thought and extension
mechanistic view of the universe (and human being)
la mettrie: everything, including humans, is composed of matter and operates according to physical laws (humans are like a machine)
d’holbach: all events, including human actions, are determined by the laws of nature
hedonism (la mettrie, d’holbach)
the idea that pleasure is the ultimate goal of human life
psychological egoism
la mettrie: human behavior is driven by the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain
d’holbach: humans are motivated by self-interest, a fundamental aspect of humans governed by laws of nature
free will (d’holbach’s determinism)
free will is an illusion, human behavior is governed by physical laws and causal relationships
immortality (d’holbach)
life is primarily defined by a sensation, a dead body isn’t affected by sensation or interaction anymore, there is no self that continues in any form
evolutionary theory (darwin)
the idea that species evolve over time through natural selection
geometrical increase
populations increase exponentially over time
variation
individuals within a population have different characteristics
adaptation
individuals with certain characteristics are more likely to survive and reproduce
inheritance
characteristics are passed down through generations
malthusian principle (malthus)
human populations grow exponentially, resources (food) grows arithmetically - pop grows faster than resources, will die out from lack of it
categorical error (substance dualism - ryle)
mistake of treating the mind as separate from the body, like a “ghost in the machine)
dispositions
tendencies to behave in a certain way in specific circumstances
causal role of mental states (functionalism - lewis)
mental states can be identified by their typical causes
the role of behavior (functionalism - lewis)
behavior is an indicator of the presence of certain mental states
mad pain/martian pain
minds are not reduced to physical states nor are they just behaviors, they are functional properties
mind-brain type identity theory
mental states can be reduced to brain states, mental states are identical to brain processes
sensation statements: communicating with mental states (“i feel pain”)
brain process statement: physical processes occurring in the brain (“the brain’s pain processing centers are activated”)
reductionism
minds are just brains, mental processes are just physical processes
the location problems
not all mental states are located somewhere, can correlate to some activity in the brain and are somewhere in the brain but their location is unknown (location belongs to bodies - physical)
eliminative materialism
common-sense psychological concepts (beliefs, desires, emotions) don’t correspond to actual brain processes, do not give any ontological value to minds
folk psychology
the informal beliefs or common-senses understanding of mental states and processes that people use to make sense of behaviors (outdated way of thinking, want a scientific explanation for everything)
churchland on life after death
our mental states depend on our brain’s physical processes, an immaterial soul after death doesn’t exist (everything we experience comes from chemical activity in our brains, neuropharmacology can explain mental processes - substances can replicate mental states)