1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Trespasser
s1(3) - ‘duty owed to another (not being his visitor)’
A trespasser is someone who has no permission to be on the premises or a lawful visitor who went beyond permission
Duty owed to trespasser
s1(1)(a) duty owed for ‘injury on the premises by reason of any danger due to the state of the premises or things done or omitted to be done to them.
s1(8) no duty for damaged property
Circumstances where duty is owed
s1(3) - owes a duty ifL they are aware of the danger or have reasonable grounds to assume it exists, they know or have reasonable grounds to believe that the other person is in the vicinity of the danger or might come into the vicinity (Swain v Natui Ram Pun), and they may be expected to protect the other person against it(Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council)
s1(4) take such care as is reasonable in the circumstances to see that he is not injured by reason of the danger’
Does not have to warn of obvious dangers
Ratcliff v McConnell
Time of day and year can be relevant
Donoghue v Folkestone Properties
O does not have to spend lots of money
Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council
Not liable if O has no reason to suspect trespasser
Higgs v Foster
Not liable if unaware of danger
Rhind v Astbury Waterpark
Warnings
s1(5) O can fully discharge duty to trespasser with a clear warning, shown in Westwood v The Post Office
Child Trespassers
Same rules apply as to adults (Keown v Coventry NHS Trust, Baldaccino v West Wittering)
Defences
s1(6) - if trespasser appreciates nature and degree of the risk, could argue consent