Occupiers' Liability Act 1984

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/10

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

11 Terms

1
New cards

Trespasser

s1(3) - ‘duty owed to another (not being his visitor)’

A trespasser is someone who has no permission to be on the premises or a lawful visitor who went beyond permission

2
New cards

Duty owed to trespasser

s1(1)(a) duty owed for ‘injury on the premises by reason of any danger due to the state of the premises or things done or omitted to be done to them.

s1(8) no duty for damaged property

3
New cards

Circumstances where duty is owed

s1(3) - owes a duty ifL they are aware of the danger or have reasonable grounds to assume it exists, they know or have reasonable grounds to believe that the other person is in the vicinity of the danger or might come into the vicinity (Swain v Natui Ram Pun), and they may be expected to protect the other person against it(Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council)

s1(4) take such care as is reasonable in the circumstances to see that he is not injured by reason of the danger’

4
New cards

Does not have to warn of obvious dangers

Ratcliff v McConnell

5
New cards

Time of day and year can be relevant

Donoghue v Folkestone Properties

6
New cards

O does not have to spend lots of money

Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council

7
New cards

Not liable if O has no reason to suspect trespasser

Higgs v Foster

8
New cards

Not liable if unaware of danger

Rhind v Astbury Waterpark

9
New cards

Warnings

s1(5) O can fully discharge duty to trespasser with a clear warning, shown in Westwood v The Post Office

10
New cards

Child Trespassers

Same rules apply as to adults (Keown v Coventry NHS Trust, Baldaccino v West Wittering)

11
New cards

Defences

s1(6) - if trespasser appreciates nature and degree of the risk, could argue consent